Eric wrote:
> Hi Phillip, > > You ran Andy Clarke's site through the validator instead of trying to > understand how the REM unit (the thread's topic) is used in > CSS?! All I can say is that that's just a bit sad. Instead of trying to learn > something your first action is to try to discredit the > example I posted?! No, Erric. I ran Andy Clarke's site through the validator because David Laakso (a man who usually knows what he is about) reported that it rendered strangely in his browser. Whenever a site behaves badly, the first thing to check is its validity : until that has been established beyond reasonable doubt, there is little or no point in looking under the bonnet for more arcane causes. > Well, I'll keep posting information to help folks learn and understand CSS. > Feel free to run that info through the validator and a > spell-checker if you want. The only thing that matters about such information is whether it is accurate, and as far as I know, that is not something that can yet be determined programmatically. Philip Taylor ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
