On Apr 7, 2014, at 3:28 PM, Felix Miata <mrma...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I suggest to start thinking like a puter instead of a human. By that I mean 
> the decimal system is fine for common measurements by ordinary humans. But, 
> puters use binary, and its octal and hexidecimal extensions, which suggests 
> humans working extensively with puters are better off adapting, using 
> computer math instead of the decimal system for sizing.
> 
> Computer fonts are happiest using harmonics of the 8 bit byte, which is why 
> 96 DPI and 1/4 multiples of it (120, 144, 168, 192, etc.) work well, all 
> being evenly divisible by 8. This harmonizes nicely with the most commonly 
> shipped 16px browser default text size. Embracing this fortune instead of 
> applying the convoluted X.625X1.6 methodology should pay off exponentially.


Felix:

I applaud your efforts to educate.

>From my perspective, Mobile devices bring their own mix of DPI resolutions and 
>"pixel' definitions which only compounds the problem for me. However, my 
>understanding may be fuzzy in that regard. So of this I don't understand yet.

As such, I would like to hear your thoughts/recommendations on Mobile devices 
for clarification and advice?

Cheers,

tedd

_______________
tedd sperling
t...@sperling.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to