On Sep 18, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't heard any arguments about not using rem for anything but > font-size until this thread. I've only heard that it's no different > than using em, except for the lack of the compounding issue associated > with em. And that's a really good thing. Such as that problem I had yesterday, where em values seemed to double in the spot where I had an h2 enclosed by my h1? John ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
