On Saturday, May 9, 2015, Al Sparber <aspar...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> On 5/9/2015 4:37 PM, Erik Visser wrote: > >> Al Sparber schreef op 09-05-15 om 18:30: >> >>> On 5/9/2015 7:25 AM, Erik Visser wrote: >>> >>>> Bootstrap (getbootstrap.com) was brought to my attention. >>>> >>>> Is this a good bas/general approach? >>>> What are your thoughts on and experiences with bootstrap. >>>> >>>> Or is there another / better / simpeler / leaner / cleaner approach ? >>>> >>> >>> In my opinion--yes. CSS is very logical and easy to learn. Learn CSS >>> and your site(s) will be far more efficient, and future-proof. >>> >>> Hi Al, >> >> Thanks for your thoughts. Can you explain what are the specific cons of >> using bootstrap? >> > > It's good for folks who do not understand CSS to the point of being able > to create media queries. For anyone else, it is overkill (in my opinion). > > It has been a while since i was working on a regular basis on websites. >> But I'am quite familiar with css and html/php/and more. >> > > If you understand CSS, then all you need to create a responsive site is > understand media queries. It is a series of actions/counteractions, at one > or more breakpoints. > > I agree with Al on this. If you know enough css, you can make a more efficient and lighter weight site. I've always found things like Bootstrap to be "too much". -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
