Am 06.09.2012 10:38, schrieb Lars Ellenberg:
> I'm not sure what and when, exactly, is matched against the nossl
> patterns. But the config statement is "nossl from-pattern to-pattern",
> and "from" is probably always the node name, not the outgoing IP used.
> So maybe an (additional?) nossl leihnix* 172.31*; does that?
I tried it, the nossl works, however I get a "permission denied" message.
> Any experience on how to make it work via IP or interface name?
> If not, Lars' workaround isn't too bad :)
> That is not a workaround at all.
> It is the intended usage.
I'm gonna stick to that. It works nicely. Thanks!
> Though I admit it may be unclear from the wording in the paper
> ("interfacename").
> If you read the full paper, you'll see it talks about "interface DNS
> name", which is meant to say the *resolvable* name you give the IP on
> that interface.
>
> Patches to improve the wording in the paper gladly accepted ;-)
How about:
-In this cases the syntax host-name@interfacename has to be used for the
host
records
+In these cases the syntax host-name@hosts_entry has to be used for the host
records. hosts_entry has to be a valid ip entry in the /etc/hosts file.
and in the example:
-host host4@host4-eth2
+host host4@host4_crossover
Regards
Nils
_______________________________________________
Csync2 mailing list
Csync2@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
