Hi Pei, On Aug 23, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> Ditto +1 on separate jars, > But, I actually don't think there is any contention here. I believe this was > an old SF ticket that was left behind. > Since, icTAKES.tar.gz doesn't exist anymore, I think this Jira is a moot > point in my point of view so hence it was closed. > > Since we moved to Apache, I would strongly advise us to allow the person who > will be actually doing the work (to use Maven or not, etc.) the freedom to > make this decision. +1 to this. Cheers, Chris > > --Pei > > -----Original Message----- > From: Coarr, Matt [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: cTAKES 2.6 - packaging of deliverable - was RE: [jira] [Closed] > (CTAKES-34) icTAKES.jar is missing from the .gz distributions > > My vote is to continue in the direction of the previous vote -- one jar file > produced for each module. This will align the development (svn > trunk) work using either eclipse or the command line more closely with the > execution of the binary release (jar only) environment. > > This will also set us up for a smooth migration to maven. > > My $0.02, > Matt > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
