Awesome! Thanks for confirming Chris. On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:35 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Pei, > > Your proposal below is a fine first step in the Incubator and I think we can > target > namespace moving to o.a.ctakes post release on the next one. > > +1 from me to move forward on that. On the other hand if there is > interest/time > to port the namespaces, that always helps for folks on the IPMC who don't > follow this list and who may raise an issue about the package namespaces. > In that case, you can refer them to this conversation and prior conversation > on it stating the plan. > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Chen, Pei wrote: > >> Hi Chris/Jorn, >> I had a brief look at: >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> I believe our original plan was to release 2.6-incubating as-is (preserving >> all of the old namespaces, libs, resources) but just from Apache instead of >> SourceForge. Are there any gotchas that we should look out for? [James- I >> presume you're building the release from one of the branches....] >> >> Obviously, any future releases after 2.6 will have the proper >> org.apache.ctakes namespace as this is already being worked on in trunk. >> >> Thanks, >> Pei > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >
