Hi Chris,
Thanks for confirming.  The Apache release audit tool (RAT) has been added in 
now with 0 unapproved licenses.
However, I had to add the below excludes in order for it to pass cleanly.  
Please let us know if you have any concerns/issues.
I think we can enable apache-rat:check in the Jenkins build after this release 
so it'll be caught and alert those who may have forgotten to include the 
headers.

<excludes>
<!-- File generated by maven-release-plugin -->
<exclude>release.properties</exclude>
<!-- Eclipse launch files -->
<exclude>**/*.launch</exclude>
<!-- Exclude target and eclipse files
The default RAT ignoreEclipse doesn't work
if there is a submodule that is commented out
So excluding it explictly here -->
<exclude>**/.classpath</exclude>
<exclude>**/.project</exclude>
<exclude>**/.settings/**</exclude>                                              
                                                                                
                                                        
<exclude>**/target/**</exclude>
<exclude>**/MANIFEST.MF</exclude>
<!-- Exclude bin/model resources -->
<exclude>**/resources/models/**</exclude>                                       
                        
<exclude>**/src/main/resources/**</exclude>
<exclude>**/src/test/resources/**</exclude>
<exclude>**/META-INF/org.uimafit/types.txt</exclude>                            
                                
<!-- Exclude test data files -->
<exclude>**/data/test/**</exclude>
<exclude>**/data/**</exclude>
<exclude>**/output/**</exclude> 
<exclude>**/sample_note.txt</exclude>                                           
                                                                                
        
</excludes>
<numUnapprovedLicenses>0</numUnapprovedLicenses>

Thanks,
Pei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 8:15 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Apache RAT plugin
> 
> Hi Pei,
> 
> Nope no formal place so feel free to simply state that 'it has passed RAT
> checks'
> and then rely on the mentors to verify this -- should they decide to build it.
> Otherwise, the standard place in the target folder is fine by me.
> 
> Cheers,
> Chris
> 
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mentors,
> > Is there a preferred format or place for the rat reports before voting?
> > By default, mvn apache-rat:check just places the rat.txt in the target 
> > folder.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pei

Reply via email to