Not
that crazy actually. The difference between normal coding and professional
is usually 4x, documented in Mythical Man Month. But that means you should
not spend all your time coding, but also do JavaDocs, unit tests, refactoring,
throwing out dead code, enforcing encapsulation, etc.
Kind regards from
Heinz
--
Dr. Heinz M. Kabutz (Maximum
Solutions)
Sun Java Champion
Author of "The Java(tm) Specialists'
Newsletter"
<http://www.javaspecialists.co.za/>
Tel: +27 (83) 340-5633
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Carl Olivier
Sent: 17 February 2006 13:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CTJUG Forum] Re: EstimatesHeh.The cry of coders down the ages.Estimate to yourself (say 16 hours) - then double it (thus 32 hours) then double it again (64 hours) and quote that. Haha - seems ott I know - but with scope changes, bad specs, etc - you will find it usually goes there anyways...And if not - you look good! Although if you always come in at half the estimate time this will also suck. :)Don't use that all the time - but have in teh past -specifically for difficult clients ;)
Rgds,Carl
Project managers will always ask for estimates on the time a developer thinks he/she is gonna spend coding something.I know experience plays a major role in this , but generally speaking ,what techniques do you guys use?Any rules of thumb?Lies ,etc :) ?
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Mutonho
Sent: 17 February 2006 10:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CTJUG Forum] Estimates
--
Jeff Mutonho
Java/J2EE Developer
ph : + 27 21 408 6230
mob : + 27 82 907 6420
GoogleTalk : ejbengine
Skype : ejbengine
Registered Linux user number 366042
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
