[CTJUG Forum] Re: ActiveMQ

[Ben van der Merwe]

Hi Jeff, I've used and evaluated a large number of JMS implementations over the last couple of years. Here's my fast-and-superficial run-down: OpenJMS:   Stable. Easy to use. Definitely not the best performing (not NIO-based which is essential for high performance) ActiveMQ:   Receiving most of the development action and attention. High performance, but its development is so rapid that I won't regard any given release as stable. Part of Geronimo and lots of eyeballs. More difficult to configure because of myriad configuration and hosting options. Joram:           Good performance. Very stable (4.3.14). What we are using and what I would recommend. These are the three big FLOSS players, with the exception of the JBoss implementation, which I know little of. Also note that the Sun Java System Message Queue Platform Edition (http://www.sun.com/software/products/message_queue_pe/index.xml) is free for commercial use. The Enterprise Edition is pay-ware. Of course, FioranoMQ is what you really want, if you can afford it. Regards, Ben Jeff Mutonho wrote: Anyone using ActiveMQ?How stable is it? -- Jeff GoogleTalk : ejbengine Skype : ejbengine Registered Linux user number 366042 -- Ben van der Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to CTJUG-Forum@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---