On 5/8/06, Ben van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > I've used and evaluated a large number of JMS implementations over the last > couple of years. Here's my fast-and-superficial run-down: > > OpenJMS: Stable. Easy to use. Definitely not the best performing (not > NIO-based which is essential for high performance) > ActiveMQ: Receiving most of the development action and attention. High > performance, but its development is so rapid that I won't regard any given > release as stable. Part of Geronimo and lots of eyeballs. More difficult to > configure because of myriad configuration and hosting options. > Joram: Good performance. Very stable (4.3.14). What we are using > and what I would recommend. > > These are the three big FLOSS players, with the exception of the JBoss > implementation, which I know little of. > > Also note that the Sun Java System Message Queue Platform Edition > (http://www.sun.com/software/products/message_queue_pe/index.xml) > is free for commercial use. The Enterprise Edition is pay-ware. > > Of course, FioranoMQ is what you really want, if you can afford it. > > Regards, > Ben > > > Thanx
Jeff GoogleTalk : ejbengine Skype : ejbengine Registered Linux user number 366042 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
