Kim,

This question has been coming up a lot lately!

I've been working with the University of North Texas a lot on the Texas Digital 
Newspaper Program (http://tdnp.unt.edu), which is a spin-off from the NEH and 
Library of Congress National Digital Newspaper Program and meets all of their 
standards. So far, the cheapest way to scan newspapers has been to work from 
the microfilm (specifically, first generation negative copies from the master). 
If the newspaper has not been microfilmed, the Texas State Library can do it 
for a very low cost, and you get a preservation copy of the microfilm as a 
bonus.

The costs for the UNT newspaper project are higher than some other vendors, 
partly because the quality of the result is much higher. Heritage Microfilm 
will digitize newspapers (including both images and full-text OCR, hosted at 
newspaperarchive.com) for essentially the cost of the microfilm, and a number 
of libraries are working with them. There are a number of other vendors doing 
the same thing.

The difficulty with scanning newspapers is typically their size. Some 
communities have smaller-format papers, 11x17 or so, that would fit in a 
flatbed scanner. The Epson 10000XL is a good choice, for around $3,000, and is 
also a very good scanner for photos and other materials. If your paper is 
larger than that, you need a high-resolution camera in what's called a 
"planetary scanner." The film camera version of this is what is used to produce 
the microfilm. A digital camera with enough resolution to capture the newspaper 
will cost upwards of $15,000, plus the cost of the stand. The software to do 
OCR for full-text searching ranges from a few thousand to several thousand 
dollars, depending on how industrial-strength your needs are.

A number of folks recently have also asked about funding for newspaper 
digitization. The NEH/LC project has funding, but the papers must meet certain 
criteria established annually by LC. An advisory board, of which I have been a 
member, reviews titles nominated by the UT Center for American History for 
suitability. 

The Tocker Foundation is helping smaller communities to join the Texas Digital 
Newspaper Project; they funded the digitization of the Tulia newspaper this 
year, and I hope that they will be able to work with more communities in the 
future.

Several libraries have applied for grants from the state library; UNT and the 
Center for American History were awarded a TexTreasures grant to digitize some 
of the state's oldest papers, and there is a possible cooperation grant pending 
to digitize another paper, which the state library Commission is reviewing. The 
next opening for applications for grants from the state library will be in the 
spring. Loan Star money can also be used, and some systems are taking an 
interest in newspaper digitization.

There is little other national money for newspaper digitization, but there are 
many state and local foundations who will consider awards for this purpose. 
Other states have been successful in encouraging communities to take ownership 
of their newspapers through digitization; newspaper digitization seems to be a 
project that businesses and community groups are willing to support financially.

A last word: there are copyright issues for papers more recent than 1923. Many 
publishers in small communities have been willing to give permission to the 
library to digitize more recent material. If you want to go this route, I'd be 
happy to help you get the paperwork to make sure that there won't be any issues 
later on.

Hope this helps!

-- 
Danielle Cunniff Plumer, Coordinator
Texas Heritage Digitization Initiative
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
512.463.5852 (phone) / 512.936.2306 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kim Kroll
Sent: Fri 9/5/2008 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ctls-l] Newspaper Scanners
 
Does anyone have a scanner for newspapers? If yes, what kind?

 

Kim Adele Kroll
Director
Lena Armstrong Public Library
P.O. Box 120
Belton, Texas 76513

 





Reply via email to