-Caveat Lector-
Edward Britton wrote:
> Howard:
>
> Yes, I believe, based on what I have read and have heard from Libertarian
> pundits, that Libertarians subscribe to the same basic philosophies as
> Republicans with respect to government.
You need to go back to the books, my ill-read friend.
> The only possible exception, again, according to my experience and research, is
> that Libertarians are more closely aligned with anarchy than fascism.
You're closer to the truth in this statement.
> Yes, I have labored through Mein Kamph, and I also realize that there is only an
> ideological difference at best between Hitler's "form of government" and that
> proposed, in-practice, by Republicans and Libertarians. This is especially true
> in regard to the need for political scapegoats (e.g., the homeless or welfare
> recipients) and scapegoating (e.g., stereotyping).
Hardly... Libertarians have no need for scapegoats... It just isn't our
responsibility that some people don't have homes and jobs. And apparently it
isn't yours, either... Since your form of compassion is to fund your feelings
toward "the poor" with someone else's money.
> As for threats, I openly invite you to cite just one example of a case where I
> directly threatened anybody.
I don't think you have the cajunas to directly threaten anyone...not that I advise
it.
> Were anybody to be guilty of any type of implied threat, it would be exemplified
> by Hawk's invitation for me, personally, to engage him in a battle over the
> protection of his almighty "stuff."
Not so, fella... I didn't invite anyone to engage me in battle over my stuff... My
preference is for you to leave my stuff alone.. and me too. I do mention again,
that individuals trying to take my "stuff" will have a lot poorer chance of
success without the govm't backing them up. There is not threat to you from me,
as long as you don't initiate any violence toward me. Keep your greedy paws off
my "stuff" and you don't worry about me threatening you.
> A quick review of the facts and threads in this regard would be advisable before
> you accuse anyone of inciting terrorism!
Kinda back-peddling there ain't you? You have made several "veiled threats" about
what "the poor" are going to do to us when they "come for our stuff."
> Nonetheless, I am aware of the logical and historically supported result of
> life in a society where there is such callous disregard for those of either
> end of an economic continuum. The result has heretofore been--and will be
> again--revolution. This is not a threat, sir, it is a fact.
And my opinion of that is, Sir, "Let the games begin!"
Hawk
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
