-Caveat Lector-
Hello,
I will certainly put feelers out to see if there is any validity to this
little goodie. I think most conspircy investigators have known about the
possible use of such measures, but I thought it would take a civil revolt
to cause it. Perhaps this report is just the experimental stages of what is
to come very soon. It may even tie in with what the 1-12-99 drudge report
may offer.
The following may give some guidelines as to what the peaceful and loving
U.N. has to offer the world......
The following -- which recently appeared in the Colorado Christian News --
may
be lengthy but is certainly worth the time it takes to read it
Trading U.S. Rights for UN Rules
A report on Executive Order 13107
"The Implementation of Human Rights Treaties",
signed by President Clinton, December 10, 1998
By Berit Kjos
------------------------------------------------------------------------
While Americans focused on more scintillating news, President Clinton
quietly
signed a new executive order titled "The Implementation of Human Rights
Treaties." The media ignored it and our leaders didn't tell us. Yet we will
pay the cost � in freedom as well as dollars � for the creation of a
massive
government bureaucracy to promote, monitor, and enforce compliance with
human
rights regulations mandated by the United Nations. Remember, this governing
body shows only contempt for biblical values, American sovereignty, and the
U.S. Constitution.
Clinton's timing was perfect. An attack on Iraq had been planned. And after
December's impeachment proceedings, Congress would adjourn for the
holidays.
Without its objection, the executive order would take effect within 30 days
(not a hard and fast rule 1), and become a federal law. Once implemented,
no
one would be free to do or say anything contrary to the new global
ideology.
Hard to believe? Before studying the executive order itself, take a look at
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It illustrates the deceptive
meanings behind the noble words used to persuade the American people to
accept
unthinkable regulations. Even so, on December 10, 1998, President Clinton
used
its 50th anniversary to celebrate its ideals, to honor its late sponsor
Eleanor Roosevelt, to announce his Human Rights Initiatives, and to sign
this
executive order.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
At the first glance, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights sounds good,
as
do all the intrusive UN human rights treaties. Article 18 upholds "the
right
to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..." Article 19 affirms "the
right to freedom of opinion and expression... and to seek, receive and
impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."
But Article 29 states that "these rights and freedoms may in no case be
exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
In
other words, these "rights" or "freedoms" don't apply to those who would
criticize the UN or its policies. Your rights would be conditioned on your
compliance. Only if your message supports official ideology are you free to
speak it. As Andrei Vishinsky wrote in The Law of the Soviet State, "There
can
be no place for freedom of speech, press, and so on for the foes of
socialism.
2"
The Convention on the Rights of the Child has not been ratified by the
Senate.
Yet, it would be included among "other relevant treaties" in this executive
order which begins with these words:
"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and bearing
in
mind the obligations of the United States pursuant to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other relevant treaties
concerned
with the protection and promotion of human rights to which the United
States
is now or may become a party in the future, it is hereby ordered."
Like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention on the
Rights
of the Child uses manipulative and misleading language. According to
Article
13, "The child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right
shall
include freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas of all
kinds, regardless of frontiers..." In other words, parents have no
authority
to keep a child from reading a sexually explicit magazine or visiting pagan
chat rooms on Internet.
While parents lose their right to set safe boundaries for their children,
the
State assumes full power to "protect" the child and define the rules. Thus
Article 13 concludes with: "This right may be subject to certain
restrictions,
but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary for
respect of the rights or reputations of others; or for protection of
national
security or public order."
Likewise, if parents restrict their child's "right to freedom of
association"
or their child's ambiguous rights to "privacy" or "conscience and religion"
(Articles 14 -16), they would break this law and face the potential loss of
their child to the state's "protection" services.
In the context of UN ideology, "national security or public order" refers
to
the concept of solidarity, a utopian community oneness based on shared
values
defined by globalist leaders. In their minds, anything less than social
solidarity in every community could stir conflict or incite violence. In
this
context, dissenters become foes; facts or beliefs that clash with its
vision
of unity become threats; and the uncompromising truths of biblical
Christianity become intolerable, even dangerous to public safety.
These "human rights" restrictions are already filtering into American
culture.
For example, any Christian website that promotes biblical standards for
right
and wrong could be targeted for censorship by Cyber Patrol, the world's
most
powerful Internet thought police. Owned by The Learning Company, America's
"premier developer of educational software," it has formed some powerful
"partners" around the world. These include AOL, AT&T, Bell Atlantic,
CompuServe, IBM, Microsoft, Netscape, Scholastic Network, and others. Its
website3 shows the categories in its CyberNOT Block List, a list of
offenses
that determines which websites should be screened to protect schools and
families that buy their service. These dangers include Violence/Profanity,
Nudity, Sexual Acts, Intolerance, Satanic/Cult, Drugs, and
Militant/Extremist.
Notice "Intolerance" amidst the more obvious threats. CyberPatrol warns us
that "any picture or text that elevates one group over another" would be
considered intolerant. Their filters now "protect" children and schools
across
the country from visiting American Family Association and other Christian
websites simply because they present God-given warnings and view Christian
truth and lifestyles as superior to pagan alternatives.
An international "Declaration on Tolerance," prepared by UNESCO and signed
by
its member nations, defines the new global standard for right and wrong.
All
nations would be responsible for fulfilling this international contract by
teaching the "right" kind of tolerance and training their people to
"respect"
every kind of ritual and lifestyle � no matter how contrary to God's Word.
Though the U.S. didn't sign this anti-Christian Declaration 4, our leaders
are
fueling the transformation. Consider how its decrees would undermine our
Bill
of Rights:
�"Tolerance is respect, acceptance and appreciation of the rich diversity
of
our world's cultures It is not only a moral duty, it is also a political
and
legal requirement." �"Tolerance involves the rejection of dogmatism and
absolutism." [Biblical truth?] �"Tolerance... means that one's views are
not
to be imposed on others." [Would this end freedom to share the gospel with
others? Could the UN still share its views?] �"Intolerance... is a global
threat." �"Scientific studies and networking should be undertaken to
coordinate the international community's response to this global challenge,
including analysis of root causes and effective countermeasures, as well as
research and monitoring... " �"Tolerance promotion and the shaping of
attitudes of openness, mutual listening and solidarity should take place in
schools and universities, and through non-formal education... at home and
in
the workplace." �"Promote rational tolerance teaching methods that will
address the cultural, social, economic, political and religious sources of
intolerance-- major roots of violence and exclusion. 5"
As you read on, you will see how the suggestions in the last three points
are
worked into President Clinton's Initiatives and Executive Order. But don't
forget, the first four points provide the rationale for the last three
points.
Clinton's Human Rights Initiatives
A White House Press Release, posted with the executive order at the White
House website, explained that "on the historic anniversary of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, President Clinton announced several policy
initiatives to advance human rights at home and abroad." These initiatives
include the following:
1. "Signing of a Human Rights Executive Order, that strengthens our efforts
to
implement human rights treaties, and creates an Administration working
group
to coordinate these efforts." Its main points are listed below.
2. "Establishment of a Genocide Early Warning Center, jointly run by the
State
Department and the Central Intelligence Agency, to train intelligence
resources on situations that could potentially lead to genocide."
The response of the liberal media and politicians to the bombing of the
Oklahoma Federal Building gives us a clue to the rising hostility toward
those
who refuse to embrace the new global visions. Remember how Christian and
conservative radio hosts were accused of "creating a climate of hate" that
could incite violence. In this cultural atmosphere, such an Early Warning
Center, using intrusive CIA surveillance technology to monitor those who
dissent, could well lead to repression of contrary opinions.
In fact, that might be its main purpose. Remember UNESCO's Declaration on
Tolerance which equates intolerance with biblical absolutes. Since
"intolerance is a global threat," today's crisis calls for analysis "of
root
causes effective countermeasures" and "monitoring..."
When the US delegation signed the Action Plan prepared at the 1995 UN
Conference for Women in Beijing, we agreed to "develop gender-sensitive
databases, information and monitoring systems." These information systems
would monitor every school, workplace, and home for compliance with
"women's
rights" to cast aside traditional gender roles in the home and assume 50-50
representation in business, entertainment, and political leadership. This
massive global information management system would be controlled by the UN
Social and Economic Council 6.
The technology needed for worldwide surveillance has been created. Existing
databases are being linked and the information management systems completed
7.
The planned "unique personal identifier" is becoming reality, and the
process
of intrusive surveillance is under way. We are ready for the next step:
3. "Enhancing our response to human rights emergencies. The U.S. Agency for
International Development will provide up to $8 million over the next five
years to non-governmental organizations to enhance their rapid response
capacities. Organizations can use these funds for a variety of purposes,
including the creation of assessment teams, monitoring units or other means
of
addressing situations where human rights may be imminently threatened."
Whenever you see the open-ended word "other", beware. It could be
interpreted
to mean anything the authors might later include 8.
4. "Preventing youth hate crime through publication in January of a guide
for
schools entitled 'Protecting Students from Harassment and Hate Crimes,'
developed jointly by the Department of Education and the National
Association
of Attorneys General. The guide provides suggestions to school systems for
addressing the issue of school violence."
Remember, words such as violence and hate have been redefined to reflect a
global perspective. They now include various forms of conflict, biblical
"intolerance", and failure to comply with the new global standards for
mental
health, i.e. the attitudes, values, beliefs, behavior, and collective
mindset
required for community solidarity. (See "Zero Tolerance for Non-Compliance"
and "Clinton's War on Hate Bans Christian values" at our website
<http://www.crossroad.to>)
6. "encourage greater reporting to and cooperation with U.S. authorities in
targeting abusers of human rights."
Assessing, monitoring, re-educating, and tracking every person around the
world is key to the UN vision of global governance 9. And, as President
Clinton stressed at his 1997 White House Conference on Hate Crimes,
"reporting" intolerant words and attitudes is the duty of every person in
the
community. The following executive order adds legal authority to this
unconstitutional plan.
The Executive Order
The President summarized the scope of the executive order in its opening
paragraph:
"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the
laws
of the United States of America, and bearing in mind the obligations of the
United States pursuant to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR), the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), the Convention on the Elimination
of
All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), and other relevant treaties
concerned with the protection and promotion of human rights to which the
United States is now or may become a party in the future, it is hereby
ordered."
Notice that it includes "other relevant treaties concerned with the
protection
and promotion of human rights..." In other words, it would apparently
include
such unratified treaties as The Convention on the Rights of the Child and
other treaties "to which" we may "become party in the future." As you read
its
precepts below, consider whether this executive order protects human
"rights"
or oppressive "responsibilities."
Section 1(a) commits the U.S. "fully to respect and implement its
obligations
under the international human rights treaties to which it is a party,
including the ICCPR, the CAT, and the CERD."
Don't assume that this EO only applies to ratified treaties. This section
doesn't rule out all the other present and future unratified treaties
included
in the opening paragraph and in Sec. 4(vi).
While the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against
Women has not been ratified, its values has been established as a cultural
norm through the liberal media, education, and a variety of laws, rules and
regulations. To speed the process, President Clinton established an agency
to
manage and oversee the implementation of the Beijing Plan for Action signed
after the 1995 UN Conference for Women. It includes all the key provisions
of
the above Convention, such as 50-50 representation in influential
positions.
"(b) It shall also be the policy and practice of the Government of the
United
States to promote respect for international human rights, both in our
relationships with all other countries and by working with and
strengthening
the various international mechanisms for the promotion of human rights,
including, inter alia, those of the United Nations, the International Labor
Organization, and the Organization of American States."
Don't forget that ILO, the International Labor Organization, shows little
concern for the rights of those who oppose its liberal, political, and
global
agenda.
Sec. 2 titled, "Responsibility of Executive Departments and Agencies"
brings
all these agencies together in a coordinated effort to follow UN guidelines
for human rights and global solidarity.
Sec. 4 establishes "an Interagency Working Group on Human Rights Treaties
for
the purpose of providing guidance, oversight, and coordination with respect
to
questions concerning the adherence to and implementation of human rights
obligations and related matters." It would be chaired by the "designee of
the
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs."
The functions of this Interagency Working Group would include:
"(i) coordinating the interagency review of any significant issues
concerning
the implementation of this order..."
"(iii) coordinating the responses of the United States Government to
complaints against it concerning alleged human rights violations submitted
to
the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and other
international organizations;"
"(iv) developing effective mechanisms to ensure that legislation proposed
by
the Administration is reviewed for conformity with international human
rights
obligations and that these obligations are taken into account in reviewing
legislation under consideration by the Congress as well;"
Apparently, the United Nations and its Human Rights treaties would replace
the
U.S. Constitution as our main standard and filter for legal action.
"(v) developing recommended proposals and mechanisms for improving the
monitoring of the actions by the various States, Commonwealths, and
territories of the United States... for their conformity with relevant
treaties, the provision of relevant information for reports and other
monitoring purposes, and the promotion of effective remedial mechanisms;"
Remember UNESCO's Declaration on Tolerance. It, too, called for "analysis
of
root causes [of intolerance] and effective countermeasures, as well as
research and monitoring...."
Just as the provisions of the unratified Biodiversity treaty are being
implemented through the EPA regulations, executive orders, and
environmental
guidelines so unratified human rights agreements are being implemented
through
executive orders, reinterpretation of old laws, and a variety of local,
state
and national regulations that bypass Congress. However, the heart of the
transformation is UNESCO's plan for Lifelong Learning, a psycho-social
process
of re-learning: replacing traditional beliefs, values, attitudes, and
individual thinking with the new global ideology and collective thinking.
This program demands everyone's participation in the Hegelian dialectic (or
consensus) process. Everyone must be willing to compromise in order to find
"common ground". People from every cultural background must agree to
dialogue
to consensus over divisive social issues under the leadership of a
facilitator
trained in psycho-social manipulation.
"(vi) developing plans for public outreach and education concerning the
provisions of the ICCPR, CAT, CERD, and other relevant treaties and human
rights-related provisions of domestic law;"
The last sentence would include Clinton's hate-crimes initiatives and
legislation as well as other prohibitions against any information that
would
be offensive to our politically correct thought police. That Christian
websites are being tagged by the Cyber Patrol because they violate its
guidelines on "tolerance" shows how "private" organizations, in partnership
with our government, are implementing the international political agenda.
Remember the last two points in UNESCO's Declaration on Tolerance. They
call
for "rational tolerance teaching methods that will address the cultural,
social, economic, political and religious sources of intolerance-major
roots
of violence and exclusion." No person would be free from the duty to
conform
to UN standards through its manipulative program for "shaping... attitudes
of
openness, mutual listening and solidarityin schools and universities, and
through non-formal education... at home and in the workplace."
These two points summarize the UNESCO plan for re-learning" or
"remediation"
for adults as well as children. Tied to the national-international plan for
School-to-Work signed into law by Clinton in 1998, this section probably
means
that no one would receive a work certificate without conforming to the new
ideology and group thinking 10.
"(vii) coordinating and directing an annual review of United States
reservations, declarations, and understandings to human rights treaties,
and
matters as to which there have been non-trivial complaints or allegations
of
inconsistency with or breach of international human rights obligations..."
A typical inconsistency would be churches that refuse to hire pagans or
homosexuals. Such "separatism" could be challenged both on the bases of
discrimination and refusal to enter into dialogue and seek "common ground."
The UN vision of solidarity rules out such "separatism." Al Gore summarized
this sentiment well at a 1991 Communitarian conference in Washington:
"Seeing
ourselves as separate is the central problem in our political thinking."
Clinton's Hate-Crimes Conference called for "some sort of club or
organization
at the school -- because if you think about it, your parents are still
pretty
well separated.... Most houses of worship are still fairly segregated. We
have
to find a disciplined, organized way out of this so that we reach every
child
in an affirmative way before something bad happens..."
But that isn't enough. Every person-young and old � must be held
responsible
for reporting violations. As in Nazi Germany, children would have to report
on
parents, neighbors on neighbors, etc. Our president outlined the plan at
his
1997 Hate-Crimes Conference,
"The Justice Department will make its own hate crimes training curriculum
available. A lot of hate crimes still go unreported�. If a crime is
unreported, that gives people an excuse to ignore it."
"the real answer to our success in this endeavor is obviously that we all
have
to work together. And all of you can strike new energy into this entire
endeavor around the country."
At the same conference, Attorney General Janet Reno added:
" ...the first line of defense is to prevent it. But then it is very
important
when you see hate to speak out against it immediately and strike it down.
How
can we in the federal government improve our coordination with local law
enforcement, with the state authorities, and with groups such as the
churches
or other advocacy groups in the community, one, to get it reported, and
two,
to work with you so that the investigations and the prosecutions
aredesigned
with one objective in mind to eliminate hate..."
This executive order links Clinton's goals to the UN vision of controlled
solidarity. For the Interagency Working Group would coordinate its efforts
with "international human rights institutions, including the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights and the Special Rapporteurs and complaints
procedures established by the United Nations Human Rights Commission."
Sec. 6, "Judicial Review, Scope, and Administration" gives an example of
Clinton's ambiguous and misleading legal language: "(c) The term 'treaty
obligations' shall mean treaty obligations as approved by the Senate
pursuant
to Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the United States Constitution."
This statement appears to be little more than a smoke screen, for the
actual
executive order extends far beyond ratified treaties or, rather, "our
treaty
obligations" (remember the first paragraph and Sec. 4 vi). Our president
intends to create the American part of the United Nations' massive
management
system and monitoring process. He is betraying our nation into the hands of
a
global government with a newly established International Criminal Court
with
authority to prosecute its opposition. And he is ready to provide the
technology the UN needs in order to track every person and community in the
world. Once this monstrous system is in place, it may not matter whether
human
rights treaties are ratified or not. We will have yielded control of our
lives
and thoughts to an anti-Christian world government. Let's hope Congress
will
awaken to this threat, blocks this executive order, and refuse to fund any
of
its seditious programs.
Meanwhile, the deception grows. In his speech commemorating the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, our president gave a glimpse of the changing
meaning of "rights" and "freedom":
"In the future days, which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a
world
founded four essential human freedoms.
1. "The first is freedom of speech and expression -- everywhere in the
world.
2. "The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way --
everywhere in the world.
3. "The third is freedom from want . . . .
4. "The fourth is freedom from fear . . . anywhere in the world . . . . The
world order which we seek is the cooperation of free countries, working
together in a friendly, civilized society."
The last two "freedoms", which apparently are now considered human rights,
would require a totalitarian world government. The third "freedom" would
require a global welfare system, and the fourth would require absolute
control
of human behavior � no guns, no free speech, etc., except in the hands of
elitist rulers.
Our Response
We shouldn't be surprised. The Bible tells us to prepare for a world
government that would persecute all who refuse to conform to its ideology
and
group thinking 11. Since Biblical Christianity is incompatible with the
UN's
global spirituality, Christians had better prepare to face persecution even
in
America.
Long ago, God showed us what to expect in this post-Christian era: "But
know
this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be
lovers
of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient
to
parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without
self-
control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers
of
pleasure rather than lovers of God. From such people turn away!"
Remember, separatism is intolerable to the UN. To "turn away" would violate
its vision of social solidarity. So it's not surprising that the passage
continues with this warning:
"...all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.
But
evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being
deceived. But you must continue in the things which you have learned..." (2
Timothy 3:1-5,12-14)
It won't be easy to continue to stand firm in God's uncompromising Word
when
the world demands consensus. But there is no other safe position in this
fast-
changing world. Only our King can provide all the strength, wisdom, peace,
and
love we need for the battle 12. When we choose to follow Him, He strength
becomes ours! His life in us will bring encouragement and hope to all
around
us. Remember, we are on the winning side. "Blessed is the people whose God
is
the Lord!"
The LORD is my light and my salvation;
Whom shall I fear?
The LORD is the strength of my life;
Of whom shall I be afraid?"
Psalm 27:1
To understand the nature of the global education system, read Brave New
Schools (Harvest House Publishers). For practical information about
feminist
spirituality and the power of the global "sisterhood" of feminist leaders,
read A Twist of Faith. Available through Christian bookstores, our website
<http://www.crossroad.to>, or by calling 800-829-5646.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENDNOTES
1. Apparently, some executive orders take effect immediately. Others
provide
more time for Congressional action. There seems to be a lack of agreement
among Congressional aides on a clear standard or procedure.
2. Encyclopaedia Britannica (1968), Volume V, page 164.
3. http://www.cyberpatrol.com/at_cp.htm
4. Deuteronomy 18:9-13, Romans 1:18-32 and I Corinthians 10:11
5. The Declaration of Principles on Tolerance, adopted and signed by the
Member States of the UNESCO on 16 November, 1995.
6. The Beijing Platform for Action, #258, #314. See also "A National
Information System: Executive Order #13011, at our website:
http://www.crossroad.to
7. See "No Place to Hide" at our website.
8. In this case, "or other means of addressing." may refer to the UN plan
outlined in a 1995 report titled Towards a Rapid Reaction Capability for
the
United Nations. Published by the Canadian government and written with the
aid
of an International Consultative Group, it calls for a "highly trained" UN
Volunteer Force armed with America's latest surveillance and reconnaissance
technology ready to carry out the "riskier operations" which national
governments might forbid. Ponder some of its suggestions:
"This study's central objective is to recommend changes at all levels of
the
UN system which would give the UN an enhanced capability to respond rapidly
to
crisis situations...(p. iv)
"...the UN would need to create a database which could capture information
provided by national authorities." (page 53)
"To enhance rapid reaction, the UN and Member States need to address... the
management systems which should be put into place to ensure that national
training programs are responsive to the UN's requirements." (page 54)
"The fact that the theoretically best solution is not at present
politically
feasible does not mean that the system must simply muddle on indefinitely
in
its present condition. A great deal can be achieved without constitutional
change, by changes in such salient features as geography, legal mandates
and
behavior." Sir Brian Urquhart and Esrskine Childers (page 55)
"...surveillance technologies and information management systems could be
integrated into an organization-wide system to enhance contingency
planning."
(57)
"Governments are sometimes reluctant to release their forces for duty...
Even
when Governments are disposed to concur the process of seeking
authorization
is often slow." (600
"As professional volunteers develop into a cohesive UN force, they can
assume
responsibility for some of the riskier operations mandated by the Council
but
for which troop contributors have been hesitant to contribute... Without
the
need to consult national authorities, the UN could cut response time
significantly... As the 1995 Commission on Global Governance noted, "The
very
existence of an immediately available and effective UN Volunteer Force
could
be a deterrent."(62)
9. See "No Place to Hide" at our website: http://www.crossroad.to
10. See "Worforce Development Means life-long Indoctrination."
11. Revelation 13
12. Philippians 4:19
----------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [CTRL] Mysterious Aerial Spraying ?
> Date: Sunday, January 10, 1999 12:22 PM
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> from alt.conspiracy
> -----
> As always, Caveat Lector.
> Om
> K
> -----
> <A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.conspiracy:476996">Mysterious Aerial Spraying
?
> </A>
> -----
> Subject: Mysterious Aerial Spraying ?
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Goddard)
> Date: Sat, Jan 9, 1999 6:57 PM
> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> The Environmental News Service reports that in remote
> regions of the U.S., fleets of jets are creating massive
> grid-work contrail patterns across the sky and apparently
> are also spraying some kind of substance out of their
> wing tips that seems to be making people deathly ill.
>
> The fleets of jets lay a grid-work pattern of contrails
> that expand and turn a once clear sky into an overcast,
> and then according to witnesses a "cobweb" like material
> falls from the sky, which seems to make people very ill.
>
> One witness to these events goes so far as to suggest that
> with the secrecy said to surround these aerial activities
> and the illness they seem to induce in those on the ground,
> there is secret plan in the works for a mass culling of the
> human race (which United Nations population reports suggest
> is too large, and the U.N.'s Universal Declaration of Human
> Rights does stipulate that your right to life can be revoked
> if it's deemed to be "contrary to the purposes of the U.N.")
>
> Full story: http://ens.lycos.com/ens/jan99/1999L-01-08-05.html
>
> Anybody know of an innocuous explanation for such spraying?
> Could this be some kind of cloud-formation experimentation?
> Is such formation-flying consistent with commercial-pilot
> practice (which airport officials claim to be the case)?
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> I just discovered this shocking fact the other day:
>
> The United Nations Universal Declairation of Human Rights
> defines the right to revoke all human rights if and when
> they are determined to be contrary to the purposes of
> the U.N. as stipulated in Article 29, which states:
>
> "These rights and freedoms may in no case
> be exercised contrary to the purposes and
> principles of the United Nations."
>
> http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_udhr.htm
>
> So if my right to life is deemed to be contrary
> to the central purpose, I may not exercise it! :(
> This is a great contract! Where do I sign? Oh ya,
> our government already signed us up, how sweet.
>
>
> ************************************************************
> Visit Ian Williams Goddard ------> http://Ian.Goddard.net
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> (+) Something can come from nothing, if, and only if, (-)
> (-) that something is equal to nothing ((-)+(+) = 0). (+)
> ____________________________________________________________
> "[I]n any closed universe the negative gravitational energy
> cancels the energy of matter exactly. The total energy, or
> equivalently the total mass, is precisely equal to zero."
>
> - + - + Dr. Alan Guth (The Inflationary Universe) + - + -
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Aloha, He'Ping,
> Om, Shalom, Salaam.
> Em Hotep, Peace Be,
> Omnia Bona Bonis,
> All My Relations.
> Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
> Amen.
> Roads End
> Kris
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid
matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
