-Caveat Lector- Under the editorial direction of George Lundberg, JAMA produced three issues in 1992-1993 attempting to re-establish the lone-nut theory about the JFK assassination through interviews with the autopsy doctors. The articles were as filled with holes as the theory, moreso now in light of the last revelations of the Assassination Materials Review Board about the two separate JFK brain exams. Lundberg was on a debate panel in '93 at the Midwest Symposium on the Assassination in Chicago that was thoroughly routed by the researchers on the other side, including Gary Aquilar and David Lifton. kt >>This just in-- >> >>Unclear on exact details, but this is rich: The Editor of the JAMA >>(Journal of the American Medical Institution) has just been fired by the >>President of JAMA [or Editor fired a subordinate?] for publishing a sex >>study that states that most college students would not *say* they had >>"had sex" with regard to having had "oral sex". >> >>In other words, in their original Affidavits, both Bill Clinton and >>Monica stated they had not "had sex". On her illegally and >>surrepticiously being taped by Linda Tripp (who "led" Monica and cajoled >>on this and other key points), Monica insisted repeatedly that she and >>Clinton "never had sex", although they "fooled around" a little. >>Everyone was happy with these definitions until Monica's handpicked >>atty. (who could make no satisfactory proffer to placate Sex Police >>Commandant, Herr Starr and Monica insisted she stood by her sworn >>Affidavit) was replaced by a team of attys. who used to work in >>high-profile cases for Republican insiders (I sensed a conflict of >>interest at the time and worried for both Monica and Bill). SUDDENLY: >>Monica was browbeaten in changing her story about "sex" (probably >>threatened and convinced she'd be in leg-irons for the next X-number of >>years, ala Susan McDougal) unless she went along with Starr's version of >>"the trusth". >> >>BUT NOW: To fire a person for publishing a scientific study that shows >>that most people apparently go along with the *dictionary* definition, >>as well as what Bill and Monica has been using as a definition all >>along, is grounds for dismissal, since its publication occured during >>the Impeachment trial of Clinton on that very key issue. (!!!!!) Stay >>tuned! --gv DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
