Subject: Response to Robin Ramsey From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Constantine) Date: 1/21/1999 3:43 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Note: The Steamshovel Web site recently featured an article on mind control written by Robin Ramsey, in which I am taken to task for finding the CIA complicit in ritual abuse (perhaps he has never heard tell of The Finders, the most widely-publicized instance of RA committed by CIA mind control operatives?) and "alien" abduction (he missed The Controllers?). The following is my response to Ramsey's nonsensical remarks. � Alex Constantine > Editor: > > Does Robin Ramsay honestly believe that I implicate the CIA in ritual abuse and "alien" abduction by "ignoring the evidence?" Curious statement. Virtual Government, published by Feral House in 1997, offers over 300 pages of documented evidence that the CIA is deeply involved in illicit human experimentation and the trauma-based programming of children. Most reviewers have commented on the wealth of evidence I provide; some have found it "difficult to refute." Steamshovel editor Kenn Thomas found the book informative and engaging. How is it that Ramsay comes to make such an obvious error? > Curious, also, that Ramsay's post to the Steamshovel site does not associate the mind control devices described therein with any particular federal agency. Who, exactly, makes use of mind control implants? The Office of Management and Budget? Ramsay has already ruled out the CIA in the first paragraph, so he daren't go there... > In his pretence of knowing something about mind control, he makes much of the implants. Ramsey provides us with impressive technical and patent information (dowloaded from the newsgroups, where it is available to all?), oblivious to the fact that, these days, implants are being supplanted by frequency allocation registration. As I wrote in Psychic Dictatorship (1995), "the current state of the art in Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (RHIC) depends upon 'Personal Radio and Electromagnetic Allocation,' or PREMA." Once the subject's frequency registration is determined, "the brain becomes a link in a cybernetic system, and the subject (or group) can be surveilled, guided, manipulated, harassed or controlled from afar" (p. 44). In other words, implants are not necessary. > Mr. Ramsay takes a swipe at me with a demonstrable lie, then promotes Kathy Kasten � a mole, as a number of victims who have had the misfortune to deal with her will attest. She has claimed that "aliens" stole her child. Kathy, there are no "aliens." She is prone to raging, four-letter hysterics. Having been the target of her irrational fits of bile, I know this first-hand.. Kasten often accuses legitimate victims of harboring intelligence connections, casting suspicion on them unjustly with a McCarthyite flourish. I have seen her turn Internet MC victim subscription lists upside down with her antics. I can tell you stories ... For instance: When the CIA's Ed Dames first stepped from the black ops closet, he found an avid supporter in UCLA's Ms. Kasten. In fact, Kasten � who, like Dames, also claims to have been trained in "remote viewing" by the CIA � was so enamored with the spook that she sent a letter of support to every mind control victim on her mailing list. She praised him mightily, and implored all victims to give Dames $4,000 for lessons in "remote viewing." Horrified that she would exploit victims this way, I circulated a bio of Ed Dames to her mailing list. Kasten exploded in an e-mail to her list, claiming "Alex Constantine abuses women and hates victims." Excuse me? I do neither. What was the reason for this defamatory rant? What was my offense? I had circulated facts concerning the dark side of her friend Ed Dames. I happened to mention that he is an active mind control operative. I have since received verification from associates of Dames that he is, indeed, a CIA mind control operative. And his actions, particularly his promotion of the "alien" cover story, speak volumes. Ramsey and Kasten may believe that Dames can "remote-view Satan," but I call this grist for the brainwashed minions of Art Bell. > Ramsey's support of Kasten largely depended upon a reference from Robert Sterling, editor of The Konformist newsletter. In a January 20, 1999 telephone conversation with Sterling, he informed me that he had "lied" to Ramsey about Kasten, that he, in fact, has no confidence in her credibility, and that she was quite probably planted among the victims of mind control experimentation to provoke conflicts. Sterling had "lied," he explained, because he did not want his valid criticisms of her to haunt him in the future. That is, he fears a backlash from Ms. Kasten and so failed to speak his mind. Ramsey himself, as editor of Lobster, rejected an article submitted by Kathey Kasten because he found it "too weird." > BTW, since when is Mr. Ramsay an authority on mind control? A Northern Light search produced no listing by Ramsay on the subject. He has written no books on mind control. No articles. Yet he attempts to pass himself off as an authority. If he was, I suppose he'd already know that ritual abuse and "alien" abductions are indeed covert operations, and, yes, the CIA is in this particular business. His denial of the reams of evidence I've gathered is irrelevant and, to anyone who knows the ropes, signally careless. > >� Alex Constantine
