-Caveat Lector-

" Compassionate" West Coast Statists offer free
death to Oregon citizens.
Death...the ultimate compassionate social agenda.
flw

Free Ticket to Eternity
By Nat Hentoff

Saturday, February 6, 1999; Page A21

Having become, in 1997, the first state to
legalize physician-assisted suicide, Oregon, out
of further compassion, has decided to provide this
service to 270,000 low-income residents without
charge. Death does not discriminate -- why should
Oregon?
As of Dec. 1, the Oregon health plan provides
state funds for diagnostic and counseling sessions
to verify the desire for suicide. And, of course,
the lethal drugs to fulfill that desire will be
free.

State funds for this act of extreme compassion
will be segregated from federal Medicaid money
because Congress has not yet permitted death to be
subsidized under Medicaid.

As Richard Doerflinger reported in "Life At Risk"
(a newsletter published by the National Conference
of Catholic Bishops), there were angry dissenting
voices at a November hearing on this dividend for
the economically challenged.
Ric Burger -- a diabetic, a wheelchair user and a
spokesman for disabled citizens in the state --
noted: "The fact that the state of Oregon will not
properly fund our personal attendant services, yet
will pay for us to die, amounts to nothing less
than cultural genocide."

Another group, Physicians for Compassionate Care,
charged that "bureaucratic barriers have already
been placed in the way of providing state funding
for state-of-the-art antidepressant medication and
even pain medicines, while full funding of
assisted suicide for this same vulnerable
population is being promoted."

Last year, the Economist praised Oregon's
Democratic Gov. John Kitzhaber for rationing
health care in the face of limited resources and
observed that Oregon no longer pays for such
treatments as "efforts to fight the final stages
of AIDS." But now, AIDS patients can be lawfully
assisted to kill themselves -- thereby saving the
state even more money.

Despite the recent defeat in Michigan of an
assisted-suicide proposal, other states are likely
eventually to allow doctors to provide patients
the means to dispose of themselves.

Polls indicate much popular support for
state-aided "death with dignity." Many doctors
agree. Some are neutral, like the Oregon Medical
Association.

Yet in 1994 the New York State Task Force on Life
and Law issued a report -- "When Death is Sought:
Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in the Medical
Context" -- that warned doctors and patients of
the dangers in the state's hastening of death.

This group, created by then-Gov. Mario Cuomo,
consists of lawyers, physicians and an ecumenical
roster of religious leaders. The task force
pointed out that "in light of the pervasive
failure of our health care system to treat pain
and diagnose and treat depression, legalizing
assisted suicide and euthanasia would be
profoundly dangerous for many individuals who are
ill and vulnerable. The risks would be most severe
for those who are elderly, poor, socially
disadvantaged, or without access to good medical
care."

The task force also noted that "racism, ageism,
bigotry against disabled people, and issues of
class and economic status would materially affect
killing decisions."

The Supreme Court refused on June 6, 1997, to
declare physician-assisted suicide a
constitutional right, but in the decision for a
unanimous court, Chief Justice William Rehnquist
encouraged the states to explore ways of dealing
with this rising issue.
Rehnquist emphasized that "the lives of the
terminally ill, disabled and elderly people must
be no less valued than the lives of the young and
healthy." Otherwise, he said, they would become
victims of "abuse" by compassionate expediters.

And Justice David Souter, in a concurring opinion,
stated his concern that assisted suicide could
slip into euthanasia: "Whether acting from
compassion or under some other influence, a
physician who would provide a drug for a patient
to administer might well go the further step of
administering the drug himself, so the barrier
between assisted suicide and euthanasia could
become porous as well as the line between
voluntary [and involuntary] euthanasia."

Souter also recognized "the financial incentives"
in this new era of managed care.
In the sweepingly compassionate new world ahead, I
would not be surprised if Oregon became the first
state to legalize the right of physicians to
directly kill a patient. At no cost to the
departed, of course.

� Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to