-Caveat Lector-

Greens and Growers Wide Apart on Bio-Tech Food

Reuters
19-FEB-99

CARTAGENA, Colombia, Feb 19 (Reuters) - Fears of mutant maize and
"Frankenstein food" have been pitched against promises of a horn of plenty to
end world famine at a United Nations conference on genetically-modified crops
this week.

More than 500 delegates from 130 countries are meeting in Colombia's colonial
port city of Cartagena to hammer out rules for the import, export and use of
crops and food engineered in laboratories by scientists mixing genes and DNA
from plants and even animals.

Environmental activists accuse bio-technology companies of trying to make a
fast buck in what is already a multibillion-dollar industry at the risk of
sparking a huge ecological disaster and damaging human health.

The manufacturers of genetically-modified foods accuse the pressure groups of
using "bogus, metaphysical" arguments in a bid to wrap the industry up in red
tape.

U.N. officials hope government representatives will adopt a protocol by the
end of the meeting on Tuesday but concede that any agreement would likely be
"based on moral suasion rather than punishment" -- effectively a dog with no
teeth.

"It's now possible to do stuff that only writers could imagine before and
build up completely new life forms. The argument that we need
genetically-modified food to feed the world is complete bull," Mika Raila, a
Greenpeace spokesman at the conference, told Reuters.

"The U.S. government has said it sees the bio-tech industry as the second most
promising after information technology ... and it's been bullying everybody to
please the U.S. bio-tech industry," he said, adding that other major grain
exporters including Canada, Argentina and Australia were also lobbying for as
few controls as possible on genetically-modified food.

Last year, about one-quarter of all maize, or corn, grown in the United States
was transgenic, together with about 35 percent of soybeans and some 45 percent
of cotton, according to industry estimates.

The bio-technology industry says their advanced techniques ultimately will
allow the world to feed its ever-growing population by boosting crop quality
and yields on existing farm land without encroaching on hitherto uncultivated
areas.

But alarm over the potential environmental and health risks of
genetically-engineered produce has reached fever-pitch in parts of Europe,
leading the British press to dub it "Frankenstein food".

This week environmental activists dumped four tons of genetically-modified,
U.S. soybeans on British Prime Minister Tony Blair's doorstep, after he said
he had no worries about eating the hi-tech food.

Raila argued that genetically-modified crops could cross- pollinate with wild
species causing unwanted changes or even wiping out plants, insects and
animals right up the food chain.

The health risk to humans of eating such foods is as yet unknown but there are
signs it could cause allergies, resistance to certain medicines and possibly
even affect internal organs, he said.

"Nobody has more of a vested interest than ourselves to make sure these
products are safe for the consumer. Bio-technology gives us the possibility to
modify plants with precision," Val Giddings, vice president of the
Washington-based Bio-Technology Industry Organisation, told Reuters.

"The argument that gene exchange is problematic is bogus. Greenpeace and its
likes have made a decision for metaphysical reasons that it is opposed to
bio-technology," he added.

Environmentalists and industry experts appear to be poles apart on the issue,
but only government representatives are taking a direct part in this week's
talks in Cartagena.

Michael Williams, spokesman for the U.N. Environment Programme said the
discussions, which began last Sunday, had been tough.

"This is a very complex issue and negotiations have been difficult. But we're
optimistic we will have a reasonable protocol at the end," he said.

Controversy has centred on whether new rules should just apply to modified
seeds or extend to products made from genetically-modified crops. There has
also been argument over who should be liable if a genetically-modified crop
produces unwanted side effects or environmental damage.

"There's a potential incompatibility between environmental and trade interests
here," Williams said.


Copyright 1999 Reuters Limited.All rights reserved

=================================
Robert F. Tatman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove "nospam" from the address to reply.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed 
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included 
information for research and educational purposes. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

POSTING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTERNET DOES NOT IMPLY PERMISSION TO SEND UNSOLICITED 
COMMERCIAL E-MAIL (SPAM) TO THIS OR ANY OTHER INTERNET ADDRESS. RECEIPT OF SPAM WILL 
RESULT IN IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF THE SENDER'S ISP.

____________________________________________________________________
More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to