-Caveat Lector-

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/DK13Ak01.html

Middle East


This war brought to you by Rendon Group
By Ian Urbina

WASHINGTON - "Word got around the department that I was a good Arabic translator who
did a great Saddam imitation," recalls the Harvard grad student. "Eventually, someone
phoned me, asking if I wanted to help change the course of Iraq policy."

So twice a week, for US$3,000 a month, the Iraqi student says, under condition of
anonymity, that he took a taxi from his campus apartment to a Boston-area recording 
studio
rented by the Rendon Group, a DC-based public relations firm with close ties to the US
government. His job: translate and dub spoofed Saddam Hussein speeches and tongue-in-
cheek newscasts for broadcast throughout Iraq.

"I never got a straight answer on whether the Iraqi resistance, the CIA or policy 
makers on
the Hill were actually the ones calling the shots," says the student, "but ultimately 
I realized
that the guys doing spin were very well and completely cut loose." And that's how
Baghdad's best-known opposition radio personality was born six years ago - during the
Clinton administration. It was one of many disinformation schemes cooked up by the
Rendon Group, which has worked for both Democratic and Republican administrations
fighting the psy-op war in the Middle East.

"The point was to discredit Saddam, but the stuff was complete slapstick," the student 
says.
"We did skits where Saddam would get mixed up in his own lies, or where [Saddam's son]
Qusay would stumble over his own delusions of grandeur." Transmissions were once a
week from stations in northern Iraq and Kuwait. "The only thing that was even remotely
funny," says the student, "were the mockeries of the royal guard and the government's
clumsy attempts to deceive arms inspectors."

The Saddam impersonator says he left Rendon not long ago out of frustration with what 
he
calls the lack of expertise and oversight in the project. It was doubly frustrating, 
he says,
because he despises Saddam, although he adds that he never has been involved with any
political party or opposition group. "No one in-house spoke a word of Arabic," he says.
"They thought I was mocking Saddam, but for all they knew I could have been lambasting
the US government." The scripts, he adds, were often ill conceived. "Who in Iraq is 
going to
think it's funny to poke fun at Saddam's mustache," the student notes, "when the vast
majority of Iraqi men themselves have mustaches?"

There were other basic problems, too. Some of the announcers hired for the radio
broadcasts, he says, were Egyptians and Jordanians, whose Arabic accents couldn't be
understood by Iraqis. "Friends in Baghdad said that the radio broadcasts were a 
complete
mumble," the student says. One CIA agent familiar with the project calls the project's
problem a lack of "due diligence", and adds that "the scripts were put together by 
23-year-
olds with connections to the Democratic National Committee."

Despite the fumbling naivete of some of its operations, the Rendon Group is no novice 
in the
field. For decades, when US bombs have dropped or foreign leaders have been felled, the
public relations shop has been on the scene, just far enough to stay out of harm's 
way, but
just close enough to keep the spin cycle going.

As Franklin Foer reported in the New Republic, during the campaign against Panama's
Manuel Noriega in 1989, Rendon's command post sat downtown in a high-rise. In 1991,
during the Gulf War, Rendon operatives hunkered down in Taif, Saudi Arabia, clocking
billable hours on a Kuwaiti emir's dole. In Afghanistan, group founder John Rendon 
joined a
9:30am conference call every morning with top-level Pentagon officials to set the 
day's war
message. Rendon operatives haven't missed a trip yet - Haiti, Kosovo, Zimbabwe,
Colombia.

The firm is tight-lipped, however, about its current projects. A spokesperson refuses 
to say
whether Rendon is doing any work in preparation for the potential upcoming invasion of
Iraq. But a current Rendon Arabic translator commented, "All I can say is that nothing 
has
changed - the work is still an expensive waste of time, mostly with taxpayer funds."
However, Rendon may just prove to be one step ahead of the game. If Saddam is toppled,
a Rendon creation is standing by to try to take his place. The Iraqi National Congress 
(INC),
a disparate coalition of Iraqi dissidents touted by the US government as the best hope 
for
an anti-Saddam coup, has gotten the go-ahead from US officials to arm and train a 
military
force for invasion. The INC is one of the few names you'll hear if reporters bother to 
press
government officials on what would come after Saddam.

At the helm of the INC is Ahmed Chalabi, a US-trained mathematician who fled from 
Jordan
in 1989 in the trunk of a car after the collapse of a bank he owned. He was 
subsequently
charged and sentenced in absentia to 22 years in prison for embezzlement. Back home in
Iraq, he's referred to by some as the so-called limousine insurgent and is said to 
hold little
actual standing with the Iraqi public. Shuttling between London and DC, Chalabi hasn't 
been
in Iraq for over years, and draws "more support on the Potomac than the Euphrates," 
says
Iraq specialist Andrew Parasiliti of the Middle East Institute in Washington DC.

"Were it not for Rendon," a State Department official remarked, "the Chalabi group
wouldn't even be on the map."

With funding first from the CIA throughout the 1990s and more recently the Pentagon,
Rendon managed the INC's every move, an INC spokesperson acknowledges, even choosing
its name, coordinating its annual strategy conferences, and orchestrating its meetings 
with
diplomatic heavy hitters, such as James Baker and Brent Scowcroft. Not that the Rendon
Group was the first purveyor of psy-op tactics for promoting US foreign policy in the 
region.
In fact, some of the most impressive spin maneuvers and disinformation campaigns
occurred during the Gulf War in 1991, the lessons of which are particularly pertinent 
as the
US again gears up.

Most notorious was the work of PR giant Hill & Knowlton (H&K) (for which current 
Pentagon
spokesperson Torie Clarke worked after she was an aide to John McCain and Bush's dad).
Subsidized by the Kuwaiti royal family, H&K dedicated 119 executives in 12 offices 
across
the country to the job of drumming up support within the United States for the 1991 
war. It
was an all-out grassroots blitz: distributing tens of thousands of "Free Kuwait" 
T-shirts and
bumper stickers at colleges across the US and setting up observances such as National
Kuwait Day and National Student Information Day. H&K also mailed 200,000 copies of a
book titled The Rape of Kuwait to American troops stationed in the Middle East. The 
firm
also massaged reporters, arranging interviews with handpicked Kuwaiti emissaries and
dispatching reams of footage of burning wells and oil-slicked birds washed ashore.

But nothing quite compared to H&K's now infamous "baby atrocities" campaign. After
convening a number of focus groups to try to figure out which buttons to press to make 
the
public respond, H&K determined that presentations involving the mistreatment of 
infants, a
tactic drawn straight from W R Hearst's playbook of the Spanish-American War, received
the best reaction.

So on October 10, 1990, the Congressional Human Rights Caucus held a hearing on Capitol
Hill at which H&K, in coordination with California Democrat Tom Lantos and Illinois
Republican John Porter, introduced a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl named Nayirah. 
(Purportedly
to safeguard against Iraqi reprisals, Nayirah's full name was not disclosed.) Weeping 
and
shaking, the girl described a horrifying scene in Kuwait City. "I volunteered at the 
al-Addan
hospital," she testified. "While I was there I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the 
hospital
with guns and go into the room where babies were in incubators. They took the babies 
out
of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die."
Allegedly, 312 infants were removed.

The tale got wide circulation, even winding up on the floor of the United Nations 
Security
Council. Before Congress gave the green light to go to war, seven of the main pro-war
senators brought up the baby-incubator allegations as a major component of their
argument for passing the resolution to unleash the bombers. Ultimately, the motion for 
war
passed by a narrow five-vote margin.

Only later was it discovered that the testimony was untrue. H&K had failed to reveal 
that
Nayirah was not only a member of the Kuwaiti royal family, but also that her father, 
Saud
Nasir al-Sabah, was Kuwait's ambassador to the US. H&K had prepped Nayirah in her
presentation, according to Harper's publisher John R MacArthur, in his book Second 
Front:
Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War. Of the seven other witnesses who stepped to
the podium that day, five had been prepped by H&K and had used false names. When
human rights organizations investigated later, they could not find that Nayirah had any
connection to the hospital. Amnesty International, among those originally duped, 
eventually
issued an embarrassing retraction.

When asked if it acknowledges the incubator story as a deception, H&K's media liaison,
Suzanne Laurita, only responded: "The company has nothing to say on this matter." 
Pushed
further on whether such deception was considered part of the public relations 
industry, she
reiterated, "Please know again that this falls into the realm that the agency has no 
wish to
confirm, deny or comment on." Years later, Scowcroft, the national security adviser at 
the
time, concluded that the tale was surely "useful in mobilizing public opinion".

H&K's baby-atrocity routine really won over the hearts, but for the minds of 
realpolitik
skeptics the Pentagon had other methods. To sway them, the Pentagon flooded the major
media outlets with reports of a top-secret satellite image that allegedly showed 
250,000
Iraqi troops and 1,500 tanks amassed at the Iraqi-Saudi border.

Once again, this was misinformation. When the US military refused to hand the satellite
image over to the press, several investigative journalists opted to purchase 
commercially
available, but equally detailed, satellite images on the open market. Shots of the 
exact
same region, during the same time frame, revealed no Iraqi soldiers anywhere near the
border. The journalists hired a coterie of experts, including a former Defense 
Intelligence
Agency analyst who specialized in desert warfare imagery, and the verdict was the same:
no Iraqis, just desert and a lot of US jet fighters sitting wing- tip to wing-tip at 
nearby Saudi
bases.

But by the time those questions began circulating about the Pentagon's supposed 
satellite
image and the web of decisions being spun around it, the US military was already set on
course. Once again, a similar mobilization is in high gear, with skeptical questions 
lagging
behind.

(�2002 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for information on our sales and syndication policies.)

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to