-Caveat Lector-

http://www.sundayherald.com/30195

Sunday Herald - 22 December 2002

America tore out 8000 pages of Iraq dossier
By James Cusick and Felicity Arbuthnot




THE United States edited out more than 8000 crucial pages of Iraq's 11,800-page dossier
on weapons, before passing on a sanitised version to the 10 non-permanent members of
the United Nations security council.

The full extent of Washington's complete control over who sees what in the crucial 
Iraqi
dossier calls into question the allegations made by US Secretary of State Colin Powell 
that
'omissions' in the document constituted a 'material breach' of the latest UN 
resolution on
Iraq.

Last week, Secretary General of the UN Kofi Annan accepted that it was 'unfortunate' 
that
his organisation had allowed the US to take the only complete dossier and edit it. He
admitted 'the approach and style were wrong' and Norway, a member of the security
council, says it is being treated like a 'second-class country'.

Although Powell called the Iraqi dossier a 'catalogue of recycled information and 
flagrant
omissions', the non-permanent members of the security council will have no way of 
testing
the US claims for themselves. This will be crucial if the US and the UK go back to the
security council seeking explicit authorisation for war on Iraq if breaches of 
resolution 1441
are confirmed when the weapons inspectors -- this weekend investigating 10 sites in 
Iraq,
including an oil refinery south of Baghdad -- deliver their report to the UN next 
month.

A UN source in New York said: 'The questions being asked are valid. What did the US 
take
out? And if weapons inspectors are supposed to be checking against the dossier's 
content,
how can any future claim be verified. In effect the US is saying trust us, and there 
are many
who just will not.'

Current and former UN diplomats are said to be livid at what some have called the 
'theft' of
the Iraqi document by the US. Hans von Sponeck, the former assistant general secretary 
of
the UN and the UN's humanitarian co- ordinator in Iraq until 2000, said: 'This is an
outrageous attempt by the US to mislead.'

Although the five permanent members of the security council -- the US, the UK, France,
China and Russia -- have had access to the complete version, there was agreement that
the US be allowed to edit the dossier on the ground that its contents were 'risky' in 
terms of
security on weapons proliferation.

Yesterday, US President George W Bush announced that a planned trip to several African
countries, scheduled for January, had been cancelled. As he gave the go-ahead to double
the current 50,000 US troops deployed in the Gulf by early January, he used his weekly
radio address to say that 'the men and women in the [US] military, many of whom will
spend Christmas at posts and bases far from home' were the only thing that stood 
between
'Americans and grave danger'.

An equally pessimistic view of the immediate future came from the Vatican. Pope John 
Paul
II promised the Catholic church would not cease to have its voice heard and would offer
prayers 'in the face of this horizon bathed in blood'.

Despite the prayers, the US military isn't expecting peace. Yesterday, General Richard
Myers, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, was asked if US forces were ready if 
called
upon immediately. General Myers simply said: 'You bet.'

The language coming from Baghdad was equally gung ho. The Iraqi newspaper Babel,
owned by Saddam Hussein's eldest son Uday, likened US and UK political leaders to 
ruthless
Mongol conquerors of the past.

News in focus: Into the breach

News in focus: Blair keeps UN in the picture, but does he want to stop Bush or speed 
him
along?

News in focus: Police swoops in Edinburgh leave paranoia in their wake

Seven Days: The Iraqi regime may be brutal, but we must overcome evil with good in the
framework of the UN

What we think: Christmas is coming, the war is getting fat

Iain MacWhirter: War Is A Suspect Package, Tony

Web report: Iraq



Copyright � 2002 smg sunday newspapers ltd. no.176088

Back to previous page

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to