Re: [CTRL] Letter to John Kerry

[Prudy L]

-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 2/27/2004 4:35:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: First, you are right. Iraq was not a threat. The problem was that Iraq's government was. The insinuation that Saddam Hussein was not a threat is absurd. If Saddam Hussein was so non-threatening, the why did the UN feel the need to pass 71 (http://www.casi.org.uk/info/scriraq.html) resolutions to condemn and contain, and control him and his cronies, including resolutions demanding that Saddam Hussein give up his WMD programs? That can't mean anything.  The UN has passed lots of resolutions on Israel, and nobody considers Israel anything but the only democracy in the Middle East.  Prudy www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om