-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

* * * * * * * * * * * * REMINDER * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On the days that I don't publish, like today, you will
receive Bill Bonner's DAILY RECKONING. This will help you
to keep pace with the changes in the markets.  Bonner and
I agree on most things in the field of economics, so the
two letters will reinforce each other.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Flash Bubbles

The Daily Reckoning

Paris, France

Wednesday, 19 May 2004

                 ---------------------

*** Dow bounces... have commodities topped out, too?

*** Why it matters that we owe money to foreigners... and
why you'd be crazy to buy a long bond...

*** Don't eat the Reuben special... and more... !

                 ---------------------

"I heard you had a tiff with George Gilder," wrote a friend
yesterday.

Not really a tiff, we explained. We made fun of Gilder in
our book. At our recent speech in Las Vegas, he politely
returned the favor.

Gilder posed two interesting questions following our
speech:

Why does it matter who owns America's debt; isn't the fact
that foreigners buy our stock and bonds a sign of strength,
not weakness?

And...

Real interest rates are the same today as they were in
1982... who cares if nominal rates are only a third as high?

We gave Gilder poor answers. Here, we try to give you
better ones.

Taking the first question first... Warren Buffett says the
nation is getting poorer at the rate of 1% per year. The
entire country - including everything - is worth about $50
trillion. The annual trade deficit of $500 billion
represents a net outflow of assets of about 1%.

Buffett is right. If I go into debt to my brother, you
could say that the entire family's financial situation is
unchanged. But if I go into debt to a stranger... the
family's net wealth goes down. The family is poorer.

Or, imagine a man with a machine shop. If he owns the shop
himself, he is richer and more secure than if someone else
owns it. If someone else owns it, he has to pay rent!
Likewise, America now pays interest on the debt owned by
foreigners... and rent on foreign-owned assets. The nation
is poorer.

We made the point that it is unwise to lend money - long-
term - at today's low rates. Not that you won't make money
at it; it's just that you'd have to be mad to take the bet.

Gilder wondered why. Real rates are the same today as they
were in '82, he pointed out.

But the fact that real rates of interest were the same is
beside the point. A bondholder cares about nominal rates;
his bonds are quoted in them. And in dollars. If he buys a
bond yielding 5% today, he is making an extraordinary bet.
He's betting that the world's financial system is 3 times
as safe today as it was a quarter a century ago.

What makes it safer? The biggest explosion of dollar
credits in the history of the world? The fastest growth in
government debt the planet has ever seen? The proliferation
of derivative contracts (to $100 trillion or more)? The
highest levels of consumer debt in American history?

We don't know if today's bond buyer will get a whacking,
but we know he deserves it.

And now, over to Tom for more news...

                 ---------------------

Tom Dyson, from the cultured Mount Vernon district of
Baltimore...

- "But mainly, the crisis will be a financial one,"
predicts Jim Rogers, "and the responsibility for it lies
with the U.S. We have allowed ourselves to go from an
international creditor to a debtor nation in a matter of a
few years. We are now the world's largest debtor nation by
a factor of five or six times."

- Barron's is interviewing the Investment Biker. The date?
You guessed it - October 17, 1988... sporting a natty bowtie
and a satisfied grin, Rogers beams up from the page.
Barron's had caught up with him in Bombay - he was resting
there after a three-month trip across China on his
motorcycle. The article is titled, "Short the World - Jim
Rogers is still bearish on stocks."

- "The dollar is the world's reserve currency," warns
George Soros' ex-trading partner, "yet we have debased it
with a rapidity that is unprecedented. The English pound
took 50 years to collapse. All of this has created a major
financial imbalance, which is going to have to be sorted
out. The Federal Reserve can't paper over the problem
forever."

- Jim Rogers may have aged, but his message hasn't - his
comments seem eerily familiar. But then again, the
circumstances are familiar. On the day of the interview,
gold closed at $412.50. Nine months earlier, gold had been
ending a three-year bull market, rising from around $300 an
ounce to just over $500 by the beginning of 1988. 18 months
later, gold was back at $360. $400 has been tested several
times since, but 15 years on, has never really been
properly breached.

- The dollar index was trading around 90... roughly where it
is trading today. At the beginning of 1985, it peaked at
140. For the next 3 years or so, the Dollar dropped like a
stone, losing 30% against the basket of European and Asian
currencies. And just like 2003, the deficit was still
growing quickly.

- Barron's exclaims, "The trade deficit jumped to $12.18
billion in September [1988] as a flood of imports swamped
an increase in exports. The larger-than-expected deficit
sent the dollar tumbling." They didn't know it, but the
deficit would become a surplus within three years, and
Rogers was speaking on what might have been the night
before the rally. He was wrong.

- The dollar stopped dropping. It bounced... for a while.
But the laws of economics prevailed, and for the next 7
years, it zig-zagged its way down to the mid-'70s in a
narrow 10-point range... a tedious, grinding bear market.
And what happened next? The dollar rallied back to 110 and
the current account - like a drowning man snatching his
final breath - plummeted into deficit again, never looking
back. It now stands over $500 billion.

- The trade deficit swelled by $46 billion in March, the
greatest one-month total on record. That bombshell was
released last week. As sure as night follows day, both
surplus and deficit will always come back into balance. The
dollar must adjust - the law states - until the balance
rights itself.

- Today, the dollar index closed at 91.07, up 0.73 in the
session. In Japanese terms, it's now within 1 yen of an 8-
month high. At writing, one dollar buys 113.49 yen. Versus
the euro, we're just shy of a 4-month high. The dollar
closed at 1.196. Gold ran for cover, extending yesterday's
$1 loss. The shiny yellow metal closed at $375.50, down
$3.70.

- Over on Wall Street, stocks gained. The Nasdaq jumped
1.13%, closing at 1,898. It may have been simply a snap
back from yesterday's downpour... or maybe not. The Dow
echoed sentiment with a rally of its own... it added 62
points to close at 9,969. Unusually, the market was able to
rally with rising Treasury yields, the 10-year bond adding
4 basis points to yield 4.74%.

- "The market will have to be strong or at least not weak
until people sort of forget about the crash and get
confident again. At that point, you can safely short stocks
because, over the next year, stocks are going to be weak,"
Rogers bravely claims in October 1988, "any stock shorted
now will pay off handsomely during the next year."

- Jim Rogers was wrong again. But 15 years later, he is
considered as an investing genius. Deservedly so... the man
is rich. For the big money, watch what happens when he gets
it right.

                 ---------------------

Bill Bonner, back in Paris... yes, Paris!

*** The Dow bounced. But it was a dull, lifeless
bounce... like a Republican struck by a beer truck.

We stick to our guess - the stock market 'recovery' has
topped out. It's all down hill from here - for the next 10
to 15 years.

Stocks are going down... and commodities are going up, right?

Maybe not. Look at the CRB commodities index. It, too, has
a topped-out kind of look. A peaked air. A droopy posture.

Oil, of course, hits new highs every day. And gasoline is
over $2 a gallon. But there's no guarantee that the trend
will continue. Higher oil prices would be consistent with a
new round of inflation. Everybody says it's coming. But
we're not so sure.

We think we hear the air escaping from the credit bubble.
As it goes out, asset prices fall. And as asset prices
fall, so does the ability of homeowners to refinance... and
their ability to spend... and their ability to buy things
that come all the way from China.

The whole economy rests on credit. What a pity to see it
hissing away.

*** The Chinese, now trying to cool down their own red-hot
economy, might soon wish they had some way to heat it up.
And all those people who worried about runaway inflation
may one day wish they could get it to leave home.

Inflation is no fun. But deflation is even less fun. [Ed.
Note: A former Daily Reckoning stalwart of the UK Edition
thinks deflation is unrealistic. Take a look at this:

Prechter is Wrong!
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_headline.cfm?id=3928 ]

So, dear reader, don't go out and borrow a lot of money,
thinking that your debt will be wiped out by inflation.
Maybe it will. But maybe you will be wiped out by deflation
long before.

*** A crowd had gathered in the Houston airport. On the
floor in front of the crowd was a man with a respirator,
attended by paramedics.

Across the hall, at Drexler's BBQ, the poor man got no
better than even odds.

"I bet he don't get up," said one of the hashslingers.

"I bet he does," said another.

Finally, a third member of the Drexler team came back to
work, triumphantly.

"See, I told you it was a seizure."

"Yeah... he's up."

*** We had a long layover. So, we sat down at Bubba's Bayou
Bar and Grill.

"What's good," we asked.

"Try the Reuben; it's our specialty."

"Okay... "

We sat and watched the world go by. At least, the part of
the world that passes through the Houston Airport.

We love America; it is so easy to feel superior here. All
you have to do is put on a pair of pants.

A new fashion trend has caught on. Grown men wear huge
knickers, cut off below the knees. And T-shirts. Why would
a man give up his dignity without a fight? Who could take
such a man seriously? Why are these men always fat? And
where did such a goofy style come from?

Aha! We think we have it - this is the Fatty Arbuckle look.
Of course! Imagine Fatty Arbuckle, back in style.

The Reuben sandwich was barely edible. The bread was like
Styrofoam. The meat was thick, dry and tasteless.

"Why do you call this your specialty?" we wanted to know.
"It's awful."

"I don't know. They got a lot of them in the freezer. And
people seem to like them better than the Bayou Burger.
Would you like to try to Bayou Burger?"

"No thanks."

*** "So you are in Las Vegas?" begins a message from our
Pittsburgh correspondent, Byron King.

"People go to Las Vegas with their wad of hard-earned funds
bulging in their pockets, fruits of their labors from
toiling in the mines, mills, fields, farms and factories of
this great land of ours. [Huh? Do we still have mines,
mills, fields, farms and factories in this great land of
ours?  I thought we tore them all down and built condos
instead.] Well, at any rate people go to Las Vegas with
their pockets bulging full of plastic, and then they piss
it all away at the slots or the tables or participating in
the other 'gaming' activities. The monetary cycle goes
straight from gambler to the House, with hardly any basic
economic activity in between.

"Yes, gambling makes jobs for blackjack dealers, cocktail
waitresses, slot machine repairmen and back-office
accountants... Most gamblers need to sleep, so there are a
few jobs for hoteliers and maids, and the kitchen staff who
feed the hungry hopeful... eventually, gambling makes jobs
for counselors who deal with gambling addictions, police
officers who deal with vice crimes, insurance adjustors who
deal with fraudulent claims, and Child Support staffers who
deal with 'failure to pay'-issues due to lack of
funds... often as not, some bankruptcy attorney has the
privilege of discharging the credit card debt. (If bank and
credit card issuers were smart, they would restrict the use
of their cards to 'purchase' credit and/or chips at
gambling establishments, and limit their extension of
credit for 'gaming' purposes. But they are not that
smart... )

"If you sign a 'marker' at a gaming establishment, you had
better read the fine print. You are probably swearing and
affirming that you have sufficient net worth to honor the
marker. And if you try, later on, to discharge the marker
in bankruptcy, the House will file an adversarial action
against you for fraud. (It takes huevos to try to discharge
a gambling establishment - they have big guys with names
like 'Freddy the Torch' working the collections... ) But if
you persist and go to court, you can settle the claim. Or
you can explain to some federal bankruptcy judge why, on a
certain date, you swore that you had sufficient net worth
to pay off the marker. But on another date, you were filing
for discharge. ('But your honor, I lost all my other funds
at the gaming tables, so that is why I could not pay off
the marker... ')

                 --- Advertisement ---

My System Can Make You 3.5 Times Your Money in 7 Days.

"I am a new subscriber to your service and have already made
$11,000 profit on your last two recommendations, CC and DELL.
Many, Many Thanks!"
-- MST Trader A.S.

That's a note I just received from one of my members.  Join us
and you could make 3.5 times your money in 7 days or even $11,000
in just two hours... just by trading Wall Street's biggest
winners and losers!

I guarantee you'll make money or your money back!
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/MST/eleven507/

                 ---------------------

The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: In theory, the Federal
Reserve can print as much money as it likes. Reflation
should be assured. Unfortunately, the wise men overlooked
one small detail... wage stagnation. If consumers cannot
afford to pay higher prices, you don't get higher prices...


FLASH BUBBLES
by Dan Denning

If you're like 99% of the world, you expect the Fed to
raise rates.

But somewhere along the way, in its perfect plan to
"reflate" the American economy and prevent a Japan-style
soft depression, the Fed made a fatal miscalculation: It
caused a simultaneous asset bubble in stocks, bonds,
commodities, housing, and real estate. We stand on the edge
of the great collapse of the "reflation rally." Some assets
will come through relatively unscathed. Others will
deflate. What the Fed is about to reap is a lot different
than what it thought it was sowing.

The Fed thought it could make money cheap and keep the stock
market high (and households feeling wealthy). It was right. It
thought it could keep money cheap and force savers to abandon
money market funds and CDs. It was right. It thought it could
keep home prices rising by keeping interest rates low (and
mortgage rates low in sympathy). It was right.

It also thought it could create so much money that raw
material prices would rise. It was right. The Fed's cheap
money caused a series of "flash bubbles" in the
commodities sector, especially in base materials, and
even in gold. It also thought it could keep money cheap
and force up producer prices. Producers have to buy raw
materials, after all. It was right.

And it thought that the whole chain of inflation - or the
ladder, if you prefer - would be completed in the form of
rising consumer prices. It thought it could prevent
deflation by first forcing up raw materials prices, then
producer prices, and finally consumer prices. If the Fed
couldn't make consumers borrow, it thought it could make
them spend by inflating. It was wrong.

This essay is not going to be a long explanation of the
failures of monetary and fiscal policy, though it would be
fitting if it were. Never before has an American government
been as irresponsible with its citizens' money as the
current administration. And never before has the Federal
Reserve done more to undermine your standard of living than
this Federal Reserve has.

The government has borrowed beyond its means and spent even
more. It has made promises it can't keep - and probably
never intended to. And the Fed has encouraged the
financialization of the American economy. It's made
borrowing money and using leverage so cheap that there is
virtually no sense of risk in the market... risk of taking
on debt... risk of buying too high... risk of the whole
financial economy falling apart.

To be fair, the irresponsibility of the American government
is perfectly in tune with the irresponsibility of
governments everywhere. We live in an age of increased
government action in the economy. Economic policies (deficit
spending, tariffs, currency manipulation) are seen as the
tools of economic warfare. Nations wield them against one
another to gain relative advantages in a world marketplace
thick with competition from numerous low-cost producers.

The American government has made three unique blunders. First, it
has taken the good will of the rest of the world for granted.
America is a debtor nation. It depends on the rest of the world
investing in America to keep the value of the dollar up. Take
away investment in American stocks, bonds, and real estate, and
the Great Inflation begins.

Second, our government has preached to you the benefits of
globalization, namely lower prices and more choice. What
they didn't mention is that true globalization means a
permanent change in the structure of the American labor
market. This is how free markets work. Production moves to the
lowest-cost centers. This is not a cyclical phenomenon, but a
structural one: It means that America is becoming a service
economy. The wages of excessive consumption are the loss of an
economy that produces new investment and wealth.

Third, however, and greatest of the policy blunders is the
assumption that monetary policy can cause wage inflation.
Because of this error, the Fed is about to discover that its
entire effort to reflate the economy through low rates has
failed. And it is nearly out of interest rate bullets.

What do consumer wages have to do with monetary policy? The
Fed has succeeded in causing inflation nearly everywhere in
the economy EXCEPT in consumer wages. But without rising
wages, consumers can't afford to pay rising prices.

Think about it. Gas prices are high and rising. Long-term
interest rates are rising, increasing the amount of
discretionary income the average consumer has to pay on his
adjustable rate mortgage or credit cards. Now add to those
two forces rising consumer prices. What is a consumer to
do? If his wages aren't rising, can he afford higher
prices, along with already high energy costs and debt
service costs?

Greenspan knows that without rising wages, there can be no
real "reflation." In congressional testimony that was
overlooked in the press accounts, the chairman said,
"Remember that more than two-thirds of the consolidated
underlying domestic costs in the United States are unit
labor costs... And unit labor costs, as best we can judge,
are still going down."

In other words, everything is going up in price... but
consumers can't afford to pay those prices. This,
ironically, is deflationary. As prices rise, consumers cut
back on spending. The more prices rise on the margins, the
less consumers consume. It is nothing less than the end of
the consumption-driven American model - the model the rest
of the world has tolerated because Americans have been
buying on credit. The credit crunch is coming.

If reflation were really going to show up in the economy,
you'd see big price markups across the board in all
sectors. But in a recent Financial Times article, only
three big U.S. companies reported success in passing high
raw materials prices on to the consumer. The companies
were Ford, Honeywell, and Hormel, the company that makes
SPAM. Not exactly a burst of reflation in the economy.

It must be hard for the Fed to realize this. It's the end
of the line for the reflation model. The Fed can't cause
consumer price inflation because it doesn't control the key
element of the whole inflation ladder, namely the labor
market. In reality, labor market changes are a function of
globalization (aided and abetted by the Fed's cheap money
policy).

The Fed has thus made it possible for a huge spike in prices,
leading to the deflationary collapse of the American consumer.
The normal policy response to skyrocketing inflation would be to
raise rates (what the market expects). But raising rates puts the
consumer in even worse shape than he is now and threatens the
main source of household balance sheet wealth: the house.

If it seems to you like the Fed doesn't have any good
choices left, I agree. It's backed itself into a monetary
corner from which there is no apparent escape. It does have
some options. But it will be exercising them without any
historical precedent of success.

For example, the Fed may decide it wants to set long-term
interest rates, too, either on the 30-year bond (which
would be reintroduced) or on the 10-year bond. Granted,
this would be considerably disruptive to the bond market.
But in an era of government intervention, it's just another
form of price control.

More likely is that the Fed will start to "monetize"
outstanding debt by buying U.S. bonds. There would
probably be a lot of sellers, if it got to that. The
Fed would be acting as a buyer of last resort, trading
newly printed cash for U.S. bonds, which it would then
own or retire. The whole goal would be getting currency
in circulation, getting the consumer to spend.

That, of course, is something the Fed probably can't do,
even it wanted to. Spending is as much a psychological
process as a fiscal one. People spend now when they think
the future is getting better, with less risk. But when
people are cautious, they spend less, they cut back, they
downsize. They scale back expectations. They think
differently.

It's hard to predict what will happen to the American
economy when this happens. A dollar sell-off is coming.
Standards of living are going to fall. Land values will
suffer, all because...

The American government was just another government that
couldn't pay its bills.


Regards,

Dan Denning,
for The Daily Reckoning

Editor's Note: Dan Denning is the editor of Strategic
Investment, one of the most respected "big-picture"
investment newsletters on the market. A former specialist
in small-cap stocks, Dan has been at the helm of Strategic
Investment since 1999 - where, drawing from his network of
global contacts, he has designed an investment strategy
that takes into account global political and economic
trends. His weekly e-mails and monthly newsletter give
investors the most complete picture of what's
shaping investment markets, what's coming next, and exactly
what to do today.

Right now, Dan says your house may be the riskiest asset
you own. To protect yourself, you must see:

The Coming Housing Bubble Implosion
http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/DRI/housing509/

                 --- Advertisement ---

You Could Quadruple Your Money as a Deadly Disease Is Wiped Out
for Good

As we see it, you could see profits of 465% on a small company
that could steal $14.5 billion in sales from Pfizer and Merck.
Its revolutionary drug is the only one that attacks the true
cause of heart disease, the leading
cause of death in Western societies. But hurry -- an FDA
announcement could come any day...  and you're going to want to
own these shares well before then!
Find the details on this and other exciting opportunities here...

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/VPI/WVPIE501/

------------------------------------------------------

MAKE YOUR OPINIONS COUNT! Visit our Discussion Board:

http://www.agora-inc.com/forums/index.cfm?cfapp=3

------------------------------------------------------
If you'd like, please e-mail this issue of the Daily
Reckoning to a friend:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/emailfriend.cfm?id=9157
------------------------------------------------------

Are you having trouble receiving your Daily Reckoning?
You can ensure its arrival in your mailbox here:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/whitelist.cfm

------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS CHANGE? WISH TO CANCEL? You can administer your
account online. Simply go to Subscriber Services at:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/subsvcs.cfm

Our writers and contributors also welcome your questions
and comments. Simply reply to this e-mail with the word
'Question' or 'Comment' in the Subject of your reply.




*******
Please note: We sent this e-mail to:
    RA Millegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
because you or someone using your e-mail address subscribed to this service.

*******
To manage your e-mail subscription, use our web interface at:
    http://www.agoramail.net/Home.cfm?List=RealityC
To cancel or for any other subscription issues, write us at:
    Order Processing Center
    Attn: Customer Service
    P.O. Box 925
    Frederick, MD 21705 USA

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to