-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/051904B.shtml

    War Crimes: Was Afghanistan Worse?
    By Steve Weissman
    t r u t h o u t | Perspective

    Wednesday 19 May 2004

    If the White House, Pentagon, and CIA thought they could get away with
humiliating, torturing, and killing captives in Iraq, they had good
reason. They did - and still do - far worse in and around Afghanistan, and
few in Congress or the media have raised the slightest complaint.

    Nor did the public protest in any significant numbers. Like good
Germans during the Holocaust, many Americans pretended not to know, while
others openly cheered Washington's heavy hand. After 9/11, we would show
"them" - the Arabs, the Muslims, the world - the high price they would pay
for stepping on Superman's cape.

    According to counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, Bush summed up the
mood after bin Laden's maniacal martyrs brought down the World Trade
Center. "I don't care what the international lawyers say," Bush declared,
"we are going to kick some ass."

    Bush then signed a series of Presidential Directives empowering the
CIA to kill or capture al-Qaeda leaders without any need for legal
prosecutions, trials, or other of the usual inconveniences. Our faceless
spooks would serve as High Sheriff and Hanging Judge.

    The President also authorized a global network of detention camps in
locations so secret that he reportedly told the CIA not to tell him where
they were. Into these dark holes, CIA officers could lock away suspected
terrorists and question them using "Stress and Duress" or "Torture-Lite"
methods far nastier than those in the Abu Ghraib prison photos.

    Consider what insiders call "water-boarding," where the spooks tie
their prisoner to a board and submerge him or her under water, provoking
an intense fear of drowning. Recurring fear, the CIA torture manuals
explain, works far better than unbearable pain, which too often encourages
victims to tell whatever they think their tormentors want to hear.

    Contrary to what many news reports now suggest, the Bush
Administration was not creating this Brave New World from scratch in the
hectic days after 9/11. CIA dragons had long "disappeared" a select group
of captives into secret dungeons, where they pried loose unwilling tongues
with hooding, sensory deprivation and sensory assault, preventing sleep,
withholding food and water, extremes of hot and cold, threats and
humiliation, and forced standing or kneeling in painful positions.

    "The Company" had employed these techniques at least as far back as
the Phoenix program in Vietnam, and had taught them to client armies and
police forces around the globe, most infamously in Central American and
Chile under Gen. Pinochet. The British used the same approach in Northern
Ireland and in their imperial counter-insurgency campaigns, while the
Israelis have perfected similar methods for years against Palestinian
prisoners.

    Where Bush broke new ground was in the scope of what he set in motion,
the industrial scale on which the CIA - and later the Pentagon - violated
all but the faintest pretense of providing humane treatment to those they
took captive. As the good guys fighting a new kind of war against evil,
our side could use whatever means we wanted.

    Were the interrogation methods legal?

    As Newsweek reported, White House, Justice Department, and Pentagon
lawyers attempted to rewrite the law. They argued - in the words of White
House Counsel Alberto R. Gonzales - that the need to obtain information
quickly to prevent terrorist attacks "renders obsolete Geneva's strict
limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of
its provisions."

    Assume that Mr. Gonzales was right. Assume that the terrorist threat
required junking all our treaty obligations and legal safeguards back to
habeas corpus and the Magna Carta. Even so, the President and his lawyers
could not legally decide to do that on their own. Unless they were junking
the Constitution as well, lawmaking still lay with Congress, as quaint and
obsolete as many of its members might seem.

    Still, the huge number of legal briefs and memos, the endless
guidelines, the ever-changing lists of approved techniques all provided a
comfort zone, which Pentagon chief Rumsfeld loves to cite as "the law." We
see the same attempt at CYA from many of the anonymous sources who are now
giving the game away to the New York Times, the Washington Post, Newsweek,
and the New Yorker's Sy Hersh.

    We're not war criminals, the insiders plead. Our consiglieri said we
could do it.

    The argument wears thin. Rule of law means more than having right-wing
legal eagles make up new rules when old ones get in the way. Even the
Supreme Court Justices who anointed Mr. Bush president show signs of
backing away from his more extreme legal claims, which few courts or
judicial scholars in the rest of the world would take as anything more
than self-serving poppycock.

    With his legal camouflage still unfolding as American forces invaded
Afghanistan, Mr. Bush's torture machine came of age. His lawyers decreed
that the Geneva Conventions did not cover Taliban and al-Qaeda suspects,
and all hell broke loose.

    Where a select group of CIA "high priests" continued quietly and out
of sight to torture "high value detainees" like al-Qaeda leaders Khalid
Sheik Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh, and Abu Zubaida, an army of American
grunts, private contractors, and less cautious CIA types now took a turn.
Reporters and TV cameras could even catch a glimpse as they frog-stepped
anonymous "enemy combatants" in hoods and shackles and forced them into
stress positions at Bagram Air Base, near Kabul.

    For all its secrecy, Guantanamo revealed worse. One early photo
clearly showed a group of hooded detainees sitting with their knees under
them in an extremely painful position. To get tough guys to sit that way,
the guards must have asked very nicely indeed - or used some old-fashioned
kicking, beating, and clubbing. Perhaps the Pentagon's recently revealed
videos will show us, if the military does not shred them before subpoenas
are served.

    John Walker Lindh, the young American Taliban who was captured in
Afghanistan, saw first hand how the system worked. According to his
initial statements, his captors kept him hooded, cuffed, and often naked,
deprived him of sleep, and withheld food and appropriate medicine for his
gunshot and shrapnel wounds. He subsequently withdrew any formal complaint
of mistreatment as part of his plea agreement, but Senator John Warner's
Armed Services Committee could learn by looking into his original
allegations.

    Lindh's story is a small, easily understood example of how American
forces in Afghanistan treated their captives, including an American
citizen who presumably had certain Constitutional rights. Far more
horrific is what happened to thousands of Afghanistanis who fell into the
hands of the Northern Alliance and some 150 to 200 U.S. Special Forces who
were leading them.

    Jamie Doran, a former BBC television producer, tells their story in
his film Afghan Massacre: The Convoy of Death. Broadcast in the United
States by Democracy Now, the film appeared on national television in
Britain, Germany, Italy, and Australia, and was screened by the European
Parliament. Senate investigators would do well to watch it.

    According to Doran, Northern Alliance soldiers forced some three
thousand of their prisoners into sealed containers, which they loaded onto
trucks for transport to Sheberghan prison. Having trouble breathing, the
prisoners began shouting for air. The soldiers responded by firing
directly into the containers, killing several people. The rest of the
prisoners remained sealed up for the four-day journey, licking
perspiration and even drinking blood from open wounds. When the trucks
arrived, most of the prisoners inside were dead.

    U.S. Special Forces then directed the trucks into desert, where they
stood by as their allies and underlings shot the survivors and buried them
along with those who had died on the journey. As many as three thousand
bodies lie buried in a mass grave.

    When that grave is found, as it will be, the current crisis over our
treatment of Iraqi prisoners could start up all over again.
A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly
Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a
magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France,
where he writes for t r u t h o u t.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_|
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
 http://mprofaca.cro.net

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed)
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been 
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available 
without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, 
human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, 
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this 
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of 
the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of 
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 -----------------------------------------------

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to