-Caveat Lector- http://www.mediaresearch.org/realitycheck/2004/fax20040421.asp

Papers Highlight Kerry Backing Away from Vietnam âAtrocityâ Claims, But TV Networks Stay Quiet
The TV Elite Downplays
Kerry vs. Russert

ÂÂÂÂOn Monday, Washington Post media reporter Howard Kurtz presented results of a Post study of cable news coverage from March 3 to April 16. The main finding: President Bush received three times as much live event coverage as John Kerry. If so, is that unfair to Kerry? Or is it unfair to President Bush?
ÂÂÂÂIn the last few weeks, almost all of the TV news scrutiny has flowed in Bush's direction. Nothing Kerry has said or done â unless it figures into the media attack on Bush â gains any traction. Take, for example, Kerry's Sunday appearance on NBC's Meet the Press. This could have been a high-profile news story which resulted in much pundit evaluation, as President Bushâs grilling from Russert was in February. But only NBC found the interview worth a whole story, with a summarizing story on Sunday's Nightly News and a shorter piece on Monday's Today.
ÂÂÂÂIn the Sunday night story, NBCâs Carl Quintanilla focused on Iraq, but also noted Kerry âsupported Israel's actions against Hamas, bristled at suggestions his wife release her tax returns, and once again refused to name those now- infamous foreign leaders he says wanted him elected.â
ÂÂÂÂQuintanilla added: âKerry may also be dogged by his stance on another war, Vietnam.â Asked about a 1971 Meet the Press interview in which the young Vietnam vet claimed to have seen and committed war atrocities, Kerry backed away from his wildest claims, vaguely telling Russert âI'd have framed some of that differently.â Quintanilla finished: âThat issue is likely to get more play this week as his Senate testimony against the war marks its 33rd anniversary.â
ÂÂÂÂBut neither of these passages about potential problems for Kerry aired on Today the next morning. Thatâs strange, since Kerryâs backing away from his 1971 overstatements appeared in the second paragraph on the front page of the Washington Post, and led the New York Times story on the Russert interview, headlined âKerry Backs Off Statements on Vietnam War.â
ÂÂÂÂABC and CBS chose not to air any of Kerryâs quotes about his wifeâs tax returns, or his wild statements about supposed Vietnam atrocities. ABC only mentioned Kerry as a potential 2004 partner for Hillary Clinton as they promoted the paperback edition of her memoirs on Good Morning America.
ÂÂÂÂOn Sundayâs CBS Evening News, (which aired only in Western time zones), Joie Chen showed viewers just one Kerry quote, where he used claims from Bob Woodwardâs book to trash Bush. On Mondayâs Early Show, CBSâs Bill Plante used a Kerry quote attacking Bush on Iraq. But the networks all ignored Kerry stumbling over Russertâs question about his Iraq plan: âHow can you possibly say the U.N. and NATO are going to come to our rescue when they donât have the troops or the interest of going in there?â
ÂÂÂÂOnce print reporters pressed the Kerry campaign to post Kerryâs military records on his Web site, based on the Russert interview, CBS aired two sentences at 7:30 on Wednesday morning. ABCâs Dan Harris did a story pointing fingers at âKerryâs opponentsâ for the disclosures on Good Morning America. Neither used NBCâs Sunday clips.
ÂÂÂÂWhy is John Kerry going unscrutinized on the network newscasts? Have they decided that Kerry is not worth scrutinizing? Or do they fear that the more people look at Kerry, the worse he will fare? He ought to be scrutinized by the networks as a potential President, not just another negative voice on their daily anti-Bush soundtrack.
â Tim Graham

www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to