-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=9676&cid=1&cname=Media
Was the spy scandal government-orchestrated?
Media watch by David Cohen

Not long ago, a media columnist writing in this newspaper wondered loud and
long about the country's major daily. Whatever will the New Zealand Herald
do, he whimpered, when the magnitude of its "cock-up to do with its
extensive, entirely uncorroborated reports on the Israeli intelligence
agency Mossad's supposed infiltration of Auckland in search of passports
becomes fully known?"

Ahem. Yes, well, I am sure somebody snuck into my office and used the
typewriter while I was out in the bathroom powdering my clichés.

Since I poured cold water on what then appeared to be the likely outcome of
the case to do with the two Israelis who were deservedly jailed in Auckland
last week for attempting to obtain a bogus New Zealand passport, it seems
only fair for me to admit I at least partially blew it.

Far from being any kind of embarrassing news fizzler, this bizarre case has
turned into one of those rare New Zealand news stories to command genuine
attention in the domestic and international media. Full marks to the Herald,
then, for chasing it in the first place ­ and no thanks, waitress, I don't
take cream with my humble pie.

Okay, let's take another more clear-eyed look at just one niggling aspect of
what's happened and how it might reflect on the local news organisation that
has otherwise led the coverage with great flair.

In retrospect, the Herald clearly made a smart call to go big on the story,
which had all the ingredients of a detective novel so captivatingly ghastly
it could have been written by Fiona Kidman. Cloak and dagger subterfuge.
International intrigue. Exotic-sounding names. All good and dramatic stuff
from a news outlet's point of view.

But news outlets are in the business of tackling hard questions as well as
entertaining the punters. Like the question of why it apparently took four
men to fraudulently obtain one New Zealand passport.

Were those men here pursuing any business other than obtaining a passport?
How did a far-from-successful businessman raise $100,000 to give to charity?

What part did the Australian secret service play in all of this? Why has the
Herald's "investigation" uncovered virtually no hard information about these
men?

Could it be ... is it even faintly possible ... that the answer to all of
the above is that the premier's office simply declined to release any of
this information as it suavely managed the paper's exposes?

Which brings us to the most important aspect of the Auckland paper's
coverage that remains as puzzling today as it was when it broke the story:
its almost complete lack of scepticism ­ call it credulity if you will ­
toward the official narrative.

Nowhere has this been more telling than in the question of whether the
convicted men were in fact working on behalf of the Mossad. The government
insists they were, of course, but says it will not, or cannot, produce the
evidence to fit the charge.

Should that be taken on face value? Over the past year, the Herald has run
scores of articles and op-ed pieces attempting to debunk the
Anglo-American-Australian justification for invading Iraq, which in large
part turned upon the respective premiers asking to be taken at their word.

Why should Ms Clark's administration be treated any differently by the
Herald? Out of a genial appreciation that any New Zealand Labour government
could not be even a teeny bit callow in its handling of the media? Out of a
sense of being overwhelmed by the righteousness of provincial moral suasion?

For a paper whose international clippings are peppered with the rhetoric of
disbelief, the Herald has seemed awfully willing to swallow the party line
of an unpopular government which for many months now has been in urgent need
of a focus for thunderous moral outrage ­ so cheap, so easy, so clear-cut ­
tailored to the type of wayward voter who prefers to see the world in
all-too-tidy terms without any long-term or wider context.

Pondering the same question earlier this week, an anonymous contributor to
the dependably stimulating weblog, nzpundit.
com, put it another way. Suppose, he wrote, a pair of New Zealanders were
arrested for a similar offence committed in a friendly country abroad, duly
prosecuted and convicted.

"The next morning, Howard (or Blair or the Great Satan Bush) announces that
they are SIS agents ­ though no charges were brought, because, it seems, the
'evidence' wouldn't stand up to examination in a court of law ­ and
therefore diplomatic sanctions are immediately imposed on New Zealand until
a suitably grovelling apology is received."

In such a scenario, what would be the likely reaction of New Zealand's most
important daily paper? Or of an ordinary news consumer with no stake in the
affair?

"Call me old school," he concluded, "but I prefer our espionage trials to
conducted in the courts ­ if for no other reason than the judiciary requires
a better standard of evidence that the O'Herald's editorial staff on the 9th
floor of the Beehive."

Hmm. On second thoughts, waitress, perhaps you'd better take my slice of
humble pie back. Fetch me a vodka and tonic instead.

23-Jul-2004





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_|
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
 http://mprofaca.cro.net

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed)
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been 
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it available 
without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior interest in 
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, 
human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, 
for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this 
constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of 
the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of 
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 -----------------------------------------------

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 http://mprofaca.cro.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ??not soap-boxingâ??please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â??with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâ??is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to