-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
From:                   "Linda Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent:              Fri, 21 May 1999 13:00:21 -05:0
Subject:                [BRIGADE] Clinton's Kowtow...Sorry, so sorry
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear Brigade,  This column mentions "President Buchanan" so I guess it
qualifies as "appropriate" for the BRIGADE list!!

GO PAT GO - !! Linda

---------------------------------------------------

The Washington Times - COMMENTARY

May 21, 1999

Sorry, so sorry

In the 19th century, Western governments hoping to do business with China
would sooner or later come to a ceremonial brink: To kowtow to the Chinese
monarch - kneeling three times, head touching the ground three times at
each prostration - or not to kowtow.

One early 19th-century British envoy, fearing for the dignity and prestige of
Great Britain, proposed to bend one knee and bow his head three times and
then repeat the performance twice more, "so as," in the words of one
historian, "to approximate the three kneelings and nine knockings of the
head that were required."

This choreography was not acceptable to the Chinese - and the mission
stalled for 10 days before ending in failure. A half-century later, John E.
Ward, an American representing the Buchanan administration, journeyed to
Peking and back again, also forgoing an audience with the emperor; he
would kneel, it was said, only to God and women.

The kowtow is just a figure of speech now, but it is one that comes to mind
when reflecting on the spate of diplomatic bowing and scraping by the United
States following the unintentional bombing of the Chinese embassy in
Belgrade earlier this month. Five times President Bill Clinton begged pardon,
his secretaries of state and defense amplifying and embroidering his
sentiments, as the United States variously offered regrets, condolences and
protestations of sorrow. Other forms of breast-beating and hair-rending
included the unprecedented decision to fly American flags in China at half-
staff for the bombing victims - and what the White House said was Mr.
Clinton's purely coincidental approval of a Motorola satellite launch via
Chinese rocket next month.

The diplomatic frenzy was capped by an exceptional statement of apology
by Mr. Clinton. As William F. Buckley, Jr. put it, "The big mistake was to
apologize. It's ok to regret killing three Chinese in the embassy in Belgrade,
but what is one apologizing for?" This is not semantic hair-splitting. It is
appropriate for the government to regret the incidental casualties of war
without assuming, in Mr. Buckley's words, "a heavy obligation in
conscience."

In diplomatic code, there is a world of difference between "apologizing"and
"regretting." In fact, the historical record indicates that literal apologies, with
their connotation of indefensible fault, are rare - even as nations admit costly
errors to one another (or don't, as in the special case of Japan, which has
yet to express any remorse for such crimes against humanity as the 1937
Rape of Nanking).

In 1915, for instance, when 124 American lives were lost on the Lusitania
after it was torpedoed by a German U-boat, Germany expressed regret to a
still-neutral United States. More recently, Ronald Reagan conveyed "deep
regret" to Iran in 1988 after the USS Vincennes mistakenly destroyed an
Iranian airliner, causing the deaths of its 290 passengers.

In 1991, Russia expressed its regret to South Korea for the Soviet Union's
shoot-down of KAL 007 in 1983, killing all 269 passengers. Even Mr. Clinton,
who has so very much to apologize for and regret, sticks to the diplomatic
script when it comes to state apologies.

Regarding a training accident in Italy that left 20 dead when an American
military plane severed a gondola cable last year, Mr. Clinton has said he is
"profoundly regretful" about the incident. But when the Chinese refuse to take
the president's telephone calls, support the tens of thousands of rioters in
Beijing who effectively imprisoned our ambassador for four days, providing
bullhorns and government-approved slogans of anti-Americanism - and
persist in accusing the United States of intentionally murdering its people -
Mr. Clinton decides to apologize.

The Chinese, having exploited the erroneous Belgrade bombing on a grand
scale, have been at least partly successful in distracting world attention from
next month's 10th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre and the
congressional investigations into their theft of American nuclear secrets. It
must be remembered, however, that an oafish American administration has
unwittingly assisted them in this ruse, providing everything but the crepe
paper. And who deserves an apology for that?

-----------  end  -----------------




Help Pat and the Brigade in our Battle for the White House...
Go to: http://www.gopatgo2000.org/000-v-helppat.html
Spread the word -- forward this email across the USA!
***********************************************
Don't Miss Out - Join the BRIGADE Email List! - Visit:
Official WebSite for Patrick J. Buchanan for President
Web: http://www.gopatgo2000.org
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Tel: 1-703-734-2700
WebMaster - Linda Muller - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**********************************************

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to