-Caveat Lector- I challenge anyone to prove me wrong!! The Bill of Rights is a "Constraint" on the federal thugs imposed by the People. Amendments subsequent to the Bill of Rights, the intent of which is to limit individual freedoms, are unconstitutional and were legislated by thugs, and ratified, if at all, by a uneducated electorate. Only the People can give the federal thugs the tools with which do their job, which is the protection of individual rights, including property rights. Cool hey? Love it Folks! I want some of the ole time constitutional religion. LOL We gotta remove those thugs Folks; that's all there is to it. Let's insist on some Truth be taught by those socialist bastards and bitches in the public schools; shed the light on the centrist tyrant, Ole Honest Abe! to expose the fact that it was a war of northern aggression against the South, and not a civil war. What the hell are we doing in Kosovo? Bard Visit me at: The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm Federal Government defined: ....a benefit/subsidy protection racket! > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Firedraake > Sent: Sunday, May 30, 1999 12:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SNET: [piml] (Fwd) - MAP: FW: BUSH'S INTERNET NIGHTMARE > CONTINUES > > > > -> SNETNEWS Mailing List > > Forwarded E-Mail Message > Wed, 26 May 1999 08:16:59 -0500 > MAP: FW: BUSH'S INTERNET NIGHTMARE CONTINUES > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > > May 26, 1999 > > > > BUSH REQUESTS "LIMITS TO FREEDOM" > > Internet bites Bush: Not news. Bush bites Internet: News! > > > > Contact: Ray Thomas (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Zack Exley (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > The satirical website GWBush.com has received several million > hits since a > > press conference Friday at which Texas governor and probable > presidential > > candidate George W. Bush called its owner "a garbage man" and > said "There > > ought to be limits to freedom." The outburst followed two > separate attempts > > by Bush campaign attorneys to shut down the site. (For coverage of the > > comments, please visit the press archive at http://gwbush.com/.) > > > > Those behind GWBush.com--a Boston computer consultant named > Zack Exley, and > > RTMARK--ascribe their site's newfound notoriety to the > interesting nature of > > Bush's words themselves, and also to the ease and speed with > which ordinary > > people can make their voices heard on the Internet. The > statement, besides > > being broadcast on television and reprinted in hundreds of > newspapers in the > > U.S. and abroad, immediately became a hot topic of discussion on the > > Internet. > > > > According to RTMARK spokesperson Ray Thomas, "Anyone at all can > now compete > > for attention with huge, wealthy corporations--or with well-funded > > candidates. Bush's 'limits to freedom' quote is interesting because it > > reflects the (usually unspoken) desire of certain market segments to > > suppress this potential of the Internet." > > > > "The Internet has amplified the voice of the ordinary citizen," > said Exley. > > "This web site is only two months old and cost only $210, yet we already > > have more readers than many major political magazines. > Americans are excited > > about this new power and freedom, and they will distrust a candidate who > > says he wants to limit that freedom." > > > > Bush's statement was the latest in a series of widely-reported gaffes > > related to GWBush.com. Here follows a blow-by-blow account of > the action: > > > > 1. The Bush campaign fails to reserve permutations of Bush's > name, and in > > December of 1998 Zack Exley purchases GWBush.com, GWBush.org > and GBush.org. > > > > 2. Upon noticing GWBush.com, with content by RTMARK and Exley, > Bush campaign > > advisor Karl Rove belatedly scrambles to reserve up to 260 > 'bush'-related > > domain names (Bush campaign accounts of the actual number > vary). When this > > frenzy becomes a running joke on the internet, Bush > spokespeople claim the > > names were reserved in the summer of 1998. (Internic records > available to > > the public reveal that the domains names were in fact reserved > two months > > after Exley reserved his.) > > > > 3. Bush attorney Benjamin Ginsberg sends Exley a > cease-and-desist letter, > > and shortly afterward registers a complaint with the Federal Elections > > Commission. > > > > 4. The Bush campaign tells press interested in the above situation that > > GWBush.com contains click-throughs to pornography sites. RTMARK > and Exley > > are inundated with emails from frustrated visitors seeking > pictures of nude > > women. (Note: GWBush.com has never contained nor linked to pornographic > > images of any kind.) > > > > 5. The Bush campaign tells press that GWBush.com is deceptive. > (Meanwhile, > > the Bush campaign uses the negative domain names it has > > bought--bushblows.com, bushsux.org, etc.--to point unsuspecting Internet > > users to the official campaign website.) > > > > 6. Governor Bush himself lashes out at GWBush.com at a televised press > > conference, calling the site's owner "a garbage man" and saying > "There ought > > to be limits to freedom." The quote is widely reported and > becomes a hot > > topic of discussion on the Internet. > > > > 7. Domain name speculators begin snapping up other names > related to the Bush > > campaign, like gwcocainejr.com, bush-lite.com, and cokeisbush.com. > > GWBush.com itself has so far reserved justsayyestobush.com, > > fantasticbush.com, bushisnicelydressed.org, and about a dozen others. > > > > For more about GWBush.com, including a partial press archive and letters > > from visitors, please visit the site itself. > > > > > > RTMARK (http://rtmark.com/) uses its limited liability as a > corporation to > > sponsor the sabotage of mass-produced products. One of RTMARK's ultimate > > aims is to eliminate the principle of limited liability. > Occasionally, as > > with http://www.gwbush.com/, RTMARK participates in advocacy directly > > related to issues of corporate abuses of the political process. > > > > # 30 # > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > FREE email Newsletters delivered right to your in-box. > CNET, USAToday, RollingStone, and more > Click Here Now! http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/314 > > To discuss posts to this list, subscribe to the Patriot > Discussion Mailing List via the following website: > http://www.onelist.com/subscribe/pdm -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Posted by: Firedraake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
