-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-06-05 17:13:06 EDT, you write:
<< Now, I was not aware an Executive Order could be challenged legally; I
thought Executive Orders were policies of government.
But a check to Helen Chenoweth for legal fees? For a non-profit
organization.>>
Apparently you neglected to read the post about "Heritage Rivers" or about
"Treaties." Clinton is going around the Constitution, bypassing what is
supposed to be the highest law of the land. With his heritage river EO he
has taken it upon himself to have the UN control our waterways and the land
connected to them, to include the tributaries, feeder streams etc. which
encompasses a very large part of the United States. He wants the UN, the New
World Order, the ONE world government to control "OUR" United States. These
UnAmericans in the UN did not earn any right to control the United States,
they didn't fight for it, they fought against the United States, and you want
to let "Zipperboy Clinton" give "our" United States to these "Communists?"
Clinton's EO about treaties wants us to hand over the government to these NWO
pricks. In case you didn't know, the Constitution does not permit the
President authority to make laws, or to give away the country to ant other
entity.
It takes a majority of Congress (supposedly) to override one of these
EO's. Since most of Congress are nothing but wolves in sheeps clothing
(communist sympathizers) Helen Chenoweth needs all the help she can get to
try to set things right. Do you realize how much money this could cost ...
provided it ever gets to court since Clinton has replaced nearly all judges
with his socialist/communist buddies? It will cost millions, much more than
$120,000 that Helen Chenoweth gets as a salary. Clinton has Russians, Red
Chinese and most other communist countries at his side to provide funds, not
to mention the Federal Reserve.
You seem to claim that you are a part of the "right wing" if so, put
your money where your mouth is. Fight Clinton tooth and nail as much as you
can. There are only two members of Congress that I know of who are willing
to go up against Clinton and his comrades, Chenoweth and Ron Paul (there may
be more but I never hear of them). If you think this is wrong, then why did
Congress support Clinton in Kosovo and give him more money to fight peasants?
Why is Congress going against the Constitution and trying to disarm this
nation? Why are they letting Clinton expend all our military supplies in a
war we were never meant to be involved with? Surely you don't buy this crap
about it stopping genocide?
Clinton has to be stopped now, it may already be too late to do it
legally, but it has to be tried.
If I offended you I apologize, but I just cannot stomach anyone who
supports Zipperboy, and inaction is just another means of support.
Regards,
Bob Stokes
A good laugh: "The Clinton Library"
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
