-Caveat Lector- Ah yes but what about the the duplicity of War, which is Hell, and has always been, more than anything, forced population control? This man has played into the hands of ignorance. All the while things like the RC organization saying No Birth Control. We can either take responsibility for our own growth, responsibly, or squabble and kill each other like Kings TommyKnockers. I am quite sure this is a core problem. Whether we like it or not, many of us of european descent are products of willful selection for memory. Druidism abhorred the written word, and all records were contained in oral historys, huge and lengthy...exceptional memory was inherent to this and weakness there was not allowed. Its pretty brutal for sure, but that is the way of our race so far. Brutality manifest in a brutal and barbaric universe. Only the brutal survive. We all carry the collective cross of our base and iniquitous irresponsiblity. BG Kris Millegan wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > from: > http://www.swikull.com/pca/ > <A HREF="http://www.swikull.com/pca/">http://www.swikull.com/pca/</A> > ----- > The Population Control Agenda > Dr. Stanley K. Monteith > > Part I > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > One of the most difficult concepts for Americans to accept is that > there are human beings dedicated to coercive population control and > genocide. Many readers will acknowledge that our government is helping > to finance the Red Chinese program of forced abortion, forced > sterilization, infanticide, and control of the numbers of live births. > Most readers will accept the fact that our nation is helping to finance > the United Nations' world-wide "family planning program," a form of > population control. Most rational men and women, however, find it > impossible to believe that such programs are really part of a "master > plan" to kill off large segments of the world's population. > I shall have to admit that I studied the politics of AIDS (HIV disease) > for over a decade before I finally came to a horrifying conclusion. The > real motivation behind efforts to block utilization of standard public > health measures to control further spread of the HIV epidemic was > "population control." That was not an easy concept for me to > acknowledge, despite the fact that I had long recognized that the > twentieth century has been the bloodiest hundred-year period in all > recorded human history. > > It was not until I journeyed to Elberton, Georgia, stood within the dark > shadows of the great Druid monument built there, and read the words > engraved on the massive stone pillars of that structure that I finally > came to accept the truth. At taht point it became obvious that just as > our Lord has given mankind Ten Commandments to guide our lives , so, > too, those from "the dark side" have been given their instructions from > the "one" they worship. The ten programs of the "guides" are inscribed > in eight different languages on the four granite pillars of the American > Stonehenge. That message foretells a terrifying future for humanity, and > explains why efforts to approach the AIDS epidemic from a logical point > of view have been consistently thwarted.1 > > Before you scoff, and reject my suggestion as sme sort of madness, check > out my references, then try to disprove my conclusions. If my > allegations are unfounded, you will soon recognize the deception and > return to your daily activities, certain that there is no cause for > concern. On the other hand, should you determine that my assessment is > correct, or even partially correct, then you have a moral obligation to > decide just what part you intend to play in response to the unfolding > world genocide - how you will protect yourself, your loved ones, and the > countless millions of helpless human beings throughout the world who > have been marked for destruction. > > You must never forget the warning recorded for posterity by Martin > Niemoeller, the Lutheran minister who lived in Hitler's Germany during > the 1930's and 1940's. His words echo down to us over succeeding > decades: > "In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up > because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't > speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionist. > Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a > Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to > speak up."2 > > You will note that the Reverend Niemoeller warned that after coming for > the Jews the Nazis came for both Catholics and Protestants. Why is that > fact never mentioned? > > The question that I am most frequently asked is, "How can you possibly > believe that there are people who inted to kill off large segments of > the world's population?" > > My answer is really quite simple. I hold that belief because I have read > their writings. I believe they are telling the truth. Just as Adolph > Hitler wrote of his plans for Europe in "Mein Kampf" (My Plan), so, too, > those who intend to depopulate large segments of the earth have written > of the necessity of limiting the world's population. The fact that the > vast majority of Americans have never heard of their intent, of the > George Guidestones in Elberton, or of "The Plan" and "The Hierarchy" > attests to the degree of control that exists over what the American > people have been allowed to know about the occultic forces which are > working within our society today. > ===== > Part II > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood > > As you read on you will soon discover that I have primarily relied on > material which can be readily found in books, audio-taped interviews, > and public news sources. If you take the time to check my references, > you will soon discover that there really are those who have publicly > advocated the elimination of "human weeds" and "the cleansing of > society." Indeed, to this very day your tax money is used to finance > Planned Parenthood, an organization founded by Margaret Sanger. During > the 1930s Margaret Sanger openly supported the Nazi plan for genetic > engineering of the German population, and the propagation of a "super > race." > > In Planned Parenthood's 1985 "Annual Report" leaders of that > organization proclaimed that they were, "Proud of our past, and planning > for our future." 3 > > How could anyone possibly claim to be proud of the organization founded > by Margaret Sanger when history records that she wrote of the necessity > of: "the extermination of 'human weeds' ...the 'cessation of charity,' > ... the segregation of 'morons, misfits, and the maladjusted,' and ... > the sterilization of 'genetically inferior races.'"4 > > Margaret Sanger published "The Birth Control Review." In that magazine > she openly supported the "infanticide program" promoted by Nazi Germany > in the 1930s, and publicly championed Adolf Hitler's goal of Aryan white > supremacy. In the years prior to World War II Margaret Sanger > commissioned Ernst Rudin, a member of the Nazi Party, and director of > the dreaded German Medical Experimentation Programs, to serve as an > advisor to her organization. In his excellent book "Killer Angel," > George Grant chronicles the life and writings of Margaret Sanger, and > painstakingly documents Sanger's plans for the genetic engineering of > the human race. George Grant noted that in the 1920s Margaret Sanger > wrote "The Pivot of Civilization" in which she called for: > "The 'elimination of 'human weeds,' for the 'cessation of charity' > because it prolonged the lives of the unfit, for the segregation of > 'morons, misfits, and the maladjusted,' and for the sterilization of > genetically inferior races.'"5 > According to George Grant, Margaret Sanger believed that the unfit > should not be allowed to reproduce. Accordingly, she opened a birth > control clinic in: > "The Brownsville section of New York, an area populated by newly > immigrated Slavs, Latins, Italians, and Jews. She targeted the 'unfit' > for her crusade to 'save the planet.'" 6 > > Nineteen years later, in 1939, Margaret Sanger organized her "Negro > project," a program designed to eliminate members of what she believed > to be an "inferior race." Margaret Sanger justified her proposal because > she believed that: > "The masses of Negroes ...particularly in the South, still breed > carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among > Negroes, even more than among whites, is from that portion of the > population least intelligent and fit..." 7 > > Margaret Sanger then went on to reveal that she intended to hire three > or four Colored Ministers "to travel to various black enclaves to > propagandize for birth control." She wrote: > "The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a > religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that we want to > exterminate the Negro population, and the Minister is the man who can > straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more > rebellious members." (emphasis added-Ed.) 8 > > As Margaret Sanger's organization grew in power, influence, and > acceptance, she began to write of the necessity of targeting religious > groups for destruction as well, believing that the "dysgenic races" > should include "Fundamentalists and Catholics" in addition to "blacks, > Hispanics, (and) American Indians." 9 > > As the years went by, Margaret Sanger became increasingly obsessed with > her occultic beliefs. Along with her acceptance of the occult, she > became increasingly hostile to both Christianity and the American > precepts of individual freedom under God. Her distaste for America can > be seen in her writings when she wrote: > "Birth control appeals to the advanced radical because it is calculated > to undermine the authority of the Christian churches. I look forward to > seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than > Capitalism." 10 > > Margaret Sanger eventually embraced not only communism but theosophy as > well. What is theosophy? It is a covert, occultic religion based upon > the repudiation of God and the worship of Lucifer. In modern-day > America, theosophy is one of the most powerful hidden (occult) forces > working behind the scenes in New York City, Washington D.C., and across > our nation today. 11 > ===== > Part III > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > How many times have you been told that Adolf Hitler killed 6 million > Jews in the Holocaust? What you probably have never been told, however, > is the segment of the Holocaust tragedy recorded by Professor Norman > Cohn in his historical account of the Jewish Holocaust, "Warrant for > Genocide." Professor Cohn chronicled the dark days of World War II, > noting: > "Only about a third of the civilians killed by the Nazis and their > accomplices were Jews ...Other peoples were marked out for decimation, > subjugation, and enslavement, and the civilian losses of some of these > (countries - Ed.) amounted to 11 per cent to 12 per cent of the total > population." 12 > > I believe this information has been intentionally suppressed because > those who were killed were largely Christians, and the covert forces > which control the reality of the American public today do not want the > followers of Jesus Christ in our nation to awaken to their peril > ...until it is far too late. Hitler hated not only Jews and Judaism, he > also hated Christians and Christianity as well. Why was that? Because > Adolf Hitler, just like Margaret Sanger, was a disciple of theosophy and > of Madame Blavatsky, the founder of a religion that worshipped Lucifer. > Accordingly, both Margaret Sanger and Adolf Hitler were energized by the > same "dark, spiritual forces." The fact that most of our citizens have > never heard of Madame Blavatsky, theosophy, or that two of theosophy's > most ardent disciples were Adolf Hitler and Margaret Sanger clearly > reflects the degree of control that exists over what the American people > have been allowed to learn about the occultic forces at work in our > nation today. > > As a researcher on the subject of the occult, I regularly receive > letters and publications from the Lucis Trust. The Lucis Trust of today > is the modern-day extension of the "Lucifer Publishing Company," an > organization founded by Alice Bailey during the early years of the > twentieth century. Alice Bailey was a disciple of Madame Blavatsky and > the nominal leader of the Theosophical Society between the early 1900s > and the late 1920s. Because the name "Lucifer" had such a bad > connotation in those days, Alice Bailey changed the name of her > organization from "The Lucifer Publishing Company" to "The Lucis Trust." > The nature and beliefs of her organization, however, have always > remained the same. The Lucis Trust of today is one of the major front > groups through which theosophy works to influence life here in America. > The supernatural powers that still energize The Lucis Trust today > certainly come from the same dark, spiritual forces that energized > Madame Blavatsky, Adolf Hitler, and Margaret Sanger in generations past. > > Publications from The Lucis Trust regularly refer to "The Plan" for > humanity that has been established by "The Hierarchy." Part of that plan > is inscribed on the great granite pillars of the American Stonehenge in > Elberton, Georgia ... "The Georgia Guidestones." 13 > > A full discussion on the subjects of population control and occultism is > far beyond the scope of this short monograph. Full documentation on > these subjects will be found in my soon-to-be-published book, "None Dare > Call It Genocide." At this point let me simply offer a few examples of > the views expressed by those who publicly advocate population reduction > and/or genocide. > > David Graber, a research biologist with the National Park Service, was > quoted in the Los Angeles Times Book Review Section, October 22, 1989, > as saying: > "Human happiness and certainly human fecundity are not as important as a > wild and healthy planet. I know social scientists who remind me that > people are part of nature, but it isn't true ... We have become a plague > upon ourselves and upon the Earth ...Until such time as homo sapiens > should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right > virus to come along." 14 > > Michael Fox, when he was the vice-president of The Humane Society of the > United States wrote, > "Mankind is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish and unethical > animal on the earth." 15 > > In "The First Global Revolution," published by The Council of the Club > of Rome, an international elitist organization, the authors note that: > "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that > pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and > the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human > intervention ...The real enemy, then, is humanity itself." 16 > The Los Angeles Times of April 5, 1994 quoted Cornell University > Professor David Pimentel, speaking before the American Association for > the Advancement of Science, as saying that, > "The total world population should be no more than 2 billion rather than > the current 5.6 billion." > In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote: > "The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics - > it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth > much more than twenty Bangladeshes ... This is a terrible thing to say. > In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people > per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say > it."17 > Bertrand Russell, in his book, "The Impact of Science on Society," > wrote, > "At present the population of the world is increasing ... War so far has > had no great effect on this increase ... I do not pretend that birth > control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. > There are others ... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the > world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without > making the world too full ... the state of affairs might be somewhat > unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to > suffering, especially that of others."18 > Negative Population Growth Inc. of Teaneck, New Jersey recently > circulated a letter stating their long-range goal. > "We believe that our goal for the United States should be no more than > 150 million, our size in 1950. For the world, we believe our goal should > be a population of not more than two billion, its size shortly after the > turn of the century." 19 > In the Global Assessment Report of UNEP (a United Nations sponsored > study group), Phase One Draft, Section 9, the authors quoted an expert > who suggested that: > "A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the > present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. > At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be > possible." 20 > ===== > Part IV > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > More New Age Influence > > Speaking at a round-table discussion group at the Gorbachev Conference > held in San Francisco in the fall of 1996, Dr. Sam Keen, a New Age > writer and philosopher stated that there was strong agreement that > religious institutions have to take a primary responsibility for the > population explosion. He went on to say that, > "We must speak far more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about > abortion, about values that control the population, because the > ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the > population by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal > of ecological damage." > > Mr. Keen's remarks were met with applause from the assembled audience > made up largely of New Age adherents, Socialists, Internationalists and > occultists. Many of the leading occultists of our modern world attended > that meeting in San Francisco, a meeting organized by Mikhail Gorbachev, > former Director of the Soviet KGB, and later President of Russia. 21 > > What is the message found on The Georgia Guidestones? What is the plan > of the "guides"? If you read occultic literature, you will soon find > that those who worship Lucifer today refer to a "Hierarchy" that guides > both their actions and the affairs of the world. Who are the > "Hierarchy"? The Lucis Trust, formerly The Lucifer Publishing Company, > recently sent a letter to their supporters stating, > "The spiritual Hierarchy makes definite use of the twelve spiritual > Festival periods. We can learn to cooperate with the members of the > Hierarchy as they work to bring the divine Plan to the attention of men > and women of goodwill and spiritual aspiration everywhere throughout the > world. The idea of spiritual approach - of Hierarchy to humanity and > humanity to Hierarchy - is the primary principle underlying meditation > ...understanding of how the spiritual energies which flow through each > zodiacal sign can illumine and inspire right human relations." 22 > > The ancient Druids were members of an occultic religion; the circle of > monuments at Stonehenge in England is occultic; and the message engraved > on the American Stonehenge in Elberton is occultic. Yoko Ono is the > widow of John Lennon, a man who was deeply involved in the occult. Yoko > Ono has written a musical score with three movements dedicated to the > message of The Georgia Guidestones. She was recently quoted as saying, > "I want people to know about the stones ...We're headed toward a world > where we might blow ourselves up and maybe the globe will not exist ... > it's a nice time to reaffirm ourselves, knowing all the beautiful things > that are in this country, and The Georgia Stones symbolize that." 23 > > What is the message to modern-day man which is engraved on the great > stone pillars of the Druid-like monument in Elberton? The first of the > "guides" reads: > "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. > (This-Ed.) Means the entire human race at its climax level for permanent > balance with nature." > > The Infamous Tuskegee Study > > In recent history, we have seen the influence of occultic population > control advocates here in America. Nowhere is that influence better > demonstrated than in the Tuskegee Study, a scientific research program > in which 400 syphilis-infected black men were recruited by the U.S. > Public Health Service back in 1932. The participants were all told that > they would be treated for their infections, but instead of treating > their illness, all medicines were withheld. The black men were then > actively prevented from obtaining treatment elsewhere as their bodies, > and the bodies of their wives and children, were systematically ravaged > by disease. > > The evil men who conceived that Nazi-style study justified their > atrocity by alleging that scientists needed to learn how untreated > syphilis progressed in the human body. For a period of forty years, > between 1932 and 1972, the genocidal Tuskegee Study continued. It was > not until 1972, when one newspaper finally had the courage to break the > story to the public, that the Tuskegee Study was finally terminated. By > that time, only 125 of the original 400 black men had survived. > > To this very day, 24 years after the end of that grotesque human > experiment, none of the perpetrators of that atrocity have ever been > either accused or indicted for their crimes. Back in 1932, when the > Tuskegee Study began, Margaret Sanger's ideas had already begun to > infect the minds and souls of physicians and scientists here in America. > According to Margaret Sanger's sense of morality, experiments on "human > weeds" were fully justified in the name of "science." Do you honestly > believe for one moment that such an experiment would have been tolerated > here in America had the participants been white men? 24 > > Another far more effective method of reducing the world population was > devised in the early 1960s by a group of environmentalists and > population-control adherents. They set out to block the use of DDT for > mosquito and malaria control after it had been found that the > insecticide was extremely effective in saving human lives. > > Alexander King, president of the Club of Rome, wrote, > "My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two > years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT,in > hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem." 25 > > In 1970 The National Academy of Sciences, in their book "Life Sciences," > stated that, > "In little more than two decades DDT has prevented 500 million deaths > due to malaria." > > To population-control advocates, this irresponsible preservation of > human life was unconscionable, so they set out to outlaw further use of > the pesticide. Up until 1970 all reliable scientific data had > consistently demonstrated that DDT was completely safe for both humans > and animals. Indeed, DDT was the safest pesticide ever known to mankind. > Furthermore, it was inexpensive and could be widely used in third-world > countries to control the spread of insect-borne diseases. Accordingly, > population-control adherents set out to have DDT banned in the name of > saving the environment. > > You have probably read the contrived stories alleging that DDT caused > softening of eggshells, interfered with the balance of nature, and > endangered humanity by entering into the food chain. In truth, all of > those stories were fabricated, and were simply part of a carefully > coordinated program to block further use of the life-saving pesticide. > If you are interested in learning the truth concerning the deceitful > campaign waged against DDT, I suggest that you order a copy of my > audio-taped interviews with Dr. J. Gordon Edwards. Dr. Edwards is a > world-renowned biologist who led the fight in the 1960s to counter the > propaganda program waged by environmentalists and population-control > advocates to ban further use of DDT. You can also order a copy of Dr. > Edward's excellent monograph, "Remembering Silent Spring and its > Consequences." > > William Ruckelshaus was a long-time member of the Environmental Defense > Fund, and the Director of the EPA. He outlawed further use of DDT in > 1972 despite the recommendation of the chairman of the EPA investigating > committee which had heard six months of testimony on use of the > pesticide, and had determined that DDT was completely safe. When > Ruckelshaus outlawed further use of DDT, he signed the death warrant for > hundreds of millions of helpless human beings living in third-world > countries. To those energized by the dark side, however, the loss of > hundreds of millions of human lives was relatively inconsequential. > > In his excellent monograph, "Remembering Silent Spring and its > Consequences," Professor J. Gordon Edwards quoted from a speech > delivered by Victor Yanconne, founder of the Environmental Defense Fund. > In that talk, Mr. Yanconne related a story told to him by a reporter who > had asked Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major opponents of DDT, > whether a ban on DDT wouldn't actually result in far greater use of much > more toxic pesticides. Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied: > "So what? People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of > them. We need to get rid of some of them and this is as good a way as > any." > When asked by the same reporter, "Doctor, how do you square the killing > of people with the mere loss of some birds?" Dr. Wurster is reported to > have replied, > "It doesn't really make a lot of difference, because organo phosphate > acts locally and only kills farmworkers and most of them are Mexicans > and Negroes." 26 > > How many people have died in the past 25 years since the use of DDT was > outlawed? If the National Academy of Sciences was correct in their 1970 > assessment that 500 million lives had been saved by DDT over a > twenty-year period, then we have probably lost well over 600 million > human lives during the past twenty-five years since advocates of > population control succeeded in outlawing DDT. 27 > ===== > Part V > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Relationship Between Abortion, Breast Carcinoma, and Population > Control > > Let me offer another example of a population control program which is > being promoted here in the United States today. Many physicians have > expressed their concern about the dramatic increase in breast carcinoma > seen in women in recent years. > > Despite the fact that 18 scientific studies published in both domestic > and foreign medical journals have clearly demonstrated the direct causal > relationship between first-trimester abortion and breast cancer, all > efforts to disseminate that information here in the United States have > been consistently blocked by those who favor abortion and population > control. In the fall of 1996 a new scientific paper dealing with a > meta-analysis of 23 different scientific studies on the relationship > between first-trimester abortions and breast cancer was published in a > British medical journal. > > That study clearly demonstrated a higher incidence of breast cancer in > women who had had first-trimester abortions. In response to that > publication, the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Cancer > Society (ACS), and pro-abortion/population-control advocates joined > together in an unholy alliance to attack the conclusions of the authors, > and to block all efforts to disseminate that information to American > physicians. All of the organizations mentioned above continue to oppose > efforts to have physicians warn women of the risk they face when they > submit themselves to first-trimester abortions. Before carrying out all > surgical procedures in America "advised consent" is required, except for > abortion. > > The AMA. the ACS, and the pro-death lobby continue to insist that women > must not be advised of the risk they incur when they destroy the life of > their unborn child. Why is there such inconsistency? Current abortion > policies in America are absolutely necessary to reduce our population. > That is why a minor child can be taken from school to an abortion clinic > without parental notification, yet that same child cannot be given an > aspirin without parental consent. It all has to do with population > control. 28 > > Population Control in Russia Today > > Another dramatic example of population control is the tragedy being > played out in the "former" Soviet Union today in regard to male > longevity. In Russia, the life span of the average Russian male has > dropped precipitously over the past several decades. The average life > expectancy of an American male is 74-78 years of age, and in Japan the > average life span is 78 years, but the average life span of Russian men > has fallen from 68 years in the 1970s to 63.8 years in 1985, to 57.7 > years in 1994. It is estimated that, if current trends continue, the > average life span of a Russian male will be 53 years shortly after the > turn of the century. Do you really believe that this shocking reduction > in life span is happening simply by "accident"? The true cause of this > dramatic reduction in life span in Russia will be detailed in my coming > book, "None Dare Call It Genocide." 29 > The Massacres in Africa > > One has only to learn what really happened to the Christians in Rwanda > between April and July of 1994 to imagine what may lie in store for > Christians here in America at some time in the not-too-distant future. > > After the Christian Tutsis had been disarmed by governmental decree in > the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to systematically > massacre the defenseless Christians. The massacre began in April 1994 > and continued until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets, the > Hutu forces were able to create a state of abject fear and terror within > the helpless Christian population as they systematically butchered > hundreds of thousands of them. The United Nations immediately convened > hearings on the genocide taking place in Rwanda, but Madeline Albright, > the American Ambassador to the United Nations, argued strenuously that > neighboring African nations should not be allowed to intervene until the > "civil war had come to an end." In reality, of course, there was no > civil war since those being slaughtered had no weapons with which to > defend themselves; it was simply a matter of mass murder. > > In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Made DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
