At 12:19 PM 7-31-1999 -0700, you wrote:
>
>The second of the 3 attachments would not open, got a message
>that there is a formatting error in it's name.
JFKjr.doc actually is JFKjr.rtf
below: converted to JFKjr.txt
(author & publication unknown)
WHAT HAPPENED TO JOHN KENNEDY, JR.?
Official Story Miles from the Truth
As usual, we can only piece together the REAL story from bits and
pieces ignored or downplayed by the censored, Khazarian-controlled
media. As this article will demonstrate, the "official" version of
events is at odds even with itself, contradicts John Kennedy's last
words and ignores the testimony of many witnesses to the crash of
his plane on Friday evening, July 16.
THE OFFICIAL VERSION
The final, official version of events immediately surrounding
the crash of John Kennedy's airplane is almost bare of details
or facts. The last four radar contacts were reported as follows:
9:40:20, altitude 2,200 feet; 9:40:24, altitude 1,900 feet;
9:40:29, altitude 1,600 feet and 9:40:34, altitude 1,100 feet.
The AVERAGE rate of descent works out to a little more than 4,700
feet per minute. We are told that these blips occurred at a
distance of 16 miles from the airport, but curiously we are not
told in what direction. After four days of searching, the main
fuselage of the plane was located in 116 feet of water, 7 miles
southwest of Gay Head, at the southwestern corner of Martha's
Vineyard.
Officially, the reason for the crash is unknown. The major media
have made every effort to underscore John Kennedy's limited flight
experience and the potential for pilot error. This, they say,
given haze and challenging flying conditions, could possibly have
led to the plane entering into a "Graveyard Spiral," in which the
plane swirls downward in an ever-tightening spiral at accelerating
velocity. Now, they say, it will take anywhere from six to nine
months to piece together the aircraft to determine the cause of
the crash -- either as simple pilot error or as mechanical failure.
Autopsies are said to have revealed that all 3 occupants of the
plane died instantly, of multiple injuries, at the point of impact.
The bodies of John, Carolyn and Lauren were cremated immediately
following the autopsies.
WHAT THEY'RE NOT SAYING
MILES OFF
Have a close look at the map accompanying this article. Note that
the crash wreckage was found 7 miles off the coast, 19 miles from
the airport. Remember that the last location they said was
reported on radar was only 16 miles from the airport. Thus,
according to the official version, while plunging at 6,000 feet per
minute (according to the last two radar blips), from an altitude of
1,100 feet, with only 11 seconds to impact at that rate, the
airplane managed to fly 3 miles to the west in those 11 seconds!
Wow! Shades of the "magic bullet" theory advanced by Arlen Specter
for the Warren Commission!
JOHN KENNEDY'S LAST (PUBLIC) WORDS
Early on in the coverage of John Kennedy's "missing" airplane,
it was reported that he radioed the control tower at 9:39 p.m.,
reporting his position as "13 miles from the airport, not more than
10 miles from shore" indicating that he was beginning his final
approach. Please refer again to the accompanying map. Note that
the ONLY plausible approach to Martha's Vineyard from the southwest
which would place the plane 10 miles from shore and 13 miles from
the airport would be in the vicinity of Noman's Land, a small
island due south of the Kennedy estate.
WITNESSES
Official reports either do not refer to witnesses or state outright
that there were none -- but there appear to have been many indirect
witnesses to the crash.
Victor Pribanic, a fisherman at Squibnocket Point (identified by
the number "1" on the accompanying map), reported to the Martha's
Vineyard Times that he had heard a "loud explosion-like sound" from
the direction of Noman's Land. This "ear witness" report, ignored
by mainstream media, corroborates the 13-mile distance that Kennedy
called in to the control tower.
A reporter for the Vineyard Gazette newspaper (identified by the
number "2" on the map) is reported to have told WCVB-TV in Boston
that he was out walking Friday night about the time of the crash
and saw a "big white flash in the sky" off Philbin Beach, on the
southwest coast of Martha's Vineyard.
Other reports indicate that approximately ten witnesses reported an
explosion or flash of light "from the south" at about the time of
the crash. A guest of the Kennedys (identified by the number "3"
on the map), is reported to have witnessed an explosion -- but this
report is now listed as "unconfirmed," possibly out of fear of
reprisals.
Based on the reports of witnesses and Kennedy's own report to the
control tower, there is little doubt that the crash occurred in the
vicinity of Noman's Land, some 7 and one-half miles from where the
wreckage of the plane was officially "found"!
SYMBOLOGY
The small island called Noman's Land is known as a military
target-practice area. Was this just "target practice"? If so,
then who are the real targets? The Kennedy estate is only a little
over three miles from Noman's Land, which is almost exactly due
south from the estate. Visibility that night was eight miles, so
the crash occurred within visual range of the Kennedy estate and
its guests. Surely this message has not been lost on those at the
estate that night.
Virtually all recent reports in the mainstream (controlled) media
have referred to the Kennedy estate as the Kennedy "compound".
What's wrong with the word, "estate" instead? "Compound" -- as
used to describe, for instance, the unenclosed group of buildings
at Waco -- appears to be a code word, implying that all within
are "enemies of the state". Thus, it is not surprising that any
Kennedy guest who witnessed the explosion will not step forward
at this time to provide evidence.
As in the case of Princess Diana, there are many unconfirmed
reports that Carolyn Bessette Kennedy was pregnant. A Kennedy heir
about to be born? For the twisted, occult-oriented, satanic minds
behind the scenes, perhaps this was a perfect opportunity for a
sacrifice, performed right in front of the family members for
additional impact.
It is also noteworthy that the Friday plane crash occurred within
two days of the anniversary of "Chappaquidick," also on Martha's
Vineyard. That event occurred on Friday, July 18, 1969. John
Kennedy's father was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963.
Fridays do indeed seem to hold some significance for occult,
ritual killings.
In addition, the plane crash occurred exactly on the three-year
anniversary of the downing of TWA flight #800, and in the same
general vicinity.
THE SMOKING GUN AT MONTAUK
It is probably no mere coincidence that TWA flight #800 fell out
of the sky in the same general vicinity. It has long been rumored
that special, highly-classified weapon systems exist at Montauk,
New York, which is only about 60 miles west-southwest of Martha's
Vineyard. The use of such weapons could account for eyewitness
reports of a "bright flash in the sky" in the vicinity of the
crash.
The pattern of the debris field adds credence to the notion of
mid-air destruction of John Kennedy's plane. The Vineyard Gazette
reported that debris floated up on beaches all over the southern
part of the island, from Gay Head all the way east to the Edgartown
Great Pond (near the eastern end of Martha's Vineyard) -- a
distance which covers some 25 miles of shoreline. It is doubtful
that a plane dropping into the water intact would result in such
broad dispersion of the debris.
A firsthand witness of recovered debris, writing under condition of
maintaining his anonymity, had this to say: "All indication from
Forensics and Physical evidence investigations lend themselves to
a violent explosion, either from an altitude or barometric pressure
device, or from a Particle Beam Laser -- the nature of collateral
damage to recovered aircraft parts, and items on board or from
(the aircraft) such as the headrest, foot pedals, steering yoke
carpeting and so fourth. All showed signs of violent damage,
having been `ripped' or blown from their normal positions/
locations. This can only be caused by an onboard explosion,
or an attack by a missile or Laser."
The same source, recently identified as an agent of Interpol,
reports that weather radar information as well as satellite
information is "missing" for a full two-hour period of time
surrounding the crash. This data could have shown the
electromagnetic wave [or the widely reported "haze", which is a
companion phenomenon of the Montauk equipment, as Commander Korton
points out elsewhere in this issue] which was probably generated
by the Montauk blast.
Here is another excerpt from this agent's report: "Agency is quite
familiar with the evil legacy of Montauk Point. Technology reputed
to be null and void is in fact known to be in existence there, and
being employed against the American public. This includes not only
this Laser, but (MK-Ultra) mind-control, Remote Viewing, the
infamous `Montauk chair', and so on. We strongly suspect one of
the technologies was used against subject's aircraft. Currently,
evidence points to the Laser, although this cannot be completely
substantiated."
JFK, JR. FOR PRESIDENT?
The confidential source at the site of the investigation, referred
to immediately above, states, "We have learned that subject was
preparing to either run against Hillary Clinton in the New York
Primary, or for the Presidency in 2000 (which we believe he would
have won)."
Sherman Skolnick advertises himself as the producer/moderator of
Chicago the public access, Cable-TV Program, "Broadsides", and the
chairman/founder of the Citizen's Committee to Clean up the Courts.
In a recent e-mail broadcast, he writes of John Kennedy: "He
planned to reveal a well-kept secret that on or about August 1,
1999, he was to announce he was running for president --"
Can anyone argue that John Kennedy, Jr. would NOT make a very
strong presidential candidate? Just look at the outpouring of
emotion around the nation before you even consider that argument.
His lack of reverence for "politics as usual," well reflected in
his George magazine, could have been very interesting, to say
the least.
The leading contender at present is George Bush, Jr. What would it
mean to America if the very well respected, squeaky-clean JFK, Jr.
were to bring out evidence of George Bush, Sr.'s involvement in
the death of John's father? The whole nation has been looking for
closure on that issue for some time. What motivation did JFK, Jr.
have for beginning a series of articles on political assassinations
in George magazine? Do you want to bet whether or not the Kennedy
family is aware of the Bush involvement? Isn't it plausible that
John's mother might have filled him in on some of the intriguing
details?
Of course, that isn't the only bit of "dirt" that sticks to the
Bush family. How about a $250 billion Banco Nationale del Lavoro
(BNL) account in Atlanta, held jointly in the names of Saddam
Hussein and George Bush, Sr.? Or, what about the Bush family
involvement in the savings and loan debacle? Or, how about some
hard evidence that George Bush, Sr.'s Zapata Petroleum/Offshore
Company has been heavily involved in importing drugs into this
country, in the sponsons of offshore oilrigs? Such issues are
well beyond the scope of this brief article, but are well known
to many knowledgeable researchers.
John, Jr. would certainly not have had to play all of these cards
-- he might not have had to play them at all, and any ONE of them
would have been enough to ensure his success against the "Skull
and Bones" Bush family in the 2000 elections.
CONCLUSIONS
THE WRECKAGE OF THE AIRCRAFT WAS MOVED 7-AND-ONE-HALF MILES TO
THE WEST OF THE MOST PROBABLE POINT FOR IT TO HAVE CRASHED.
THIS WAS DONE TO BUY TIME TO "FIX" THE PHONEY CRASH SCENE
TO MAKE IT CONSISTENT WITH "OFFICIAL" REPORTS.
Based on the early reports of John Kennedy's last words with the
control tower, as well as numerous reports from witnesses, it is
highly probable that his plane crashed just northeast of Noman's
Land. Anyone who would even consider the evidence of his last
words ("not more than 10 miles from shore, 13 miles from the
airport") in conjunction with a map would have reached that
conclusion within minutes, not days. There is little doubt but
that the REAL radar data would have confirmed this location. The
Vineyard Gazette reported early on in the search that Noman's Land
was a prime search area and vessels were dispatched to that area
immediately to check it out.
Somehow, however, it took four days to "find" the wreckage,
7 and one-half miles west of the REAL "splash point," 3 miles
west ("backwards") from where they say they had their last radar
contact. The radar data alone should have provided a nearly
precise location of the crashed plane -- if it was real, as
reported. We are told that the wreckage was eventually found
within one-half mile of the ideal, highest-probability location
-- which, no doubt, was determined not by the actual facts but
by computer simulations that could make the most sense out of
the debris field by simulation.
What REALLY happened during those four days can only be a matter
of informed speculation for anyone not intimately involved in the
operation. In order to produce the "right looking" evidence for
the "official" story, some tampering would have been necessary.
The damage would need to appear plausibly consistent with a
high-speed plunge into the water, rather than a mid-air
disintegration. Instruments, gauges and system monitors would have
to be "frozen" into the "right" positions. Most time-consuming of
all, the wreckage would have to be moved to a different, less
obvious location, to prevent anyone from stumbling across the work
in progress. This was facilitated by a rule to keep all cameras
more than five miles away from "the crash site" ("out of respect
for the family") -- which was, as this article documents, seven
miles from the real point of impact.
What about the autopsies? Wouldn't the bodies have shown some
evidence unique to the type of weapon used to bring down the plane?
They might, IF the medical examiners knew what they were looking
for. Could the examiners be compromised? Of course, we have seen
that before. If the bodies had been irradiated by the Montauk
weaponry, or were otherwise unsuitable for presentation, [Ed: or
if they were simply NOT THERE, a possibility raised by Commander
Korton's writing of July 18, 1999, also in this issue] it might
have been necessary to replace them. The latest reports of cloning
capabilities indicate that it is possible to create a replica
within just 3 days, possibly less without the need for memory
downloads -- another reason why it might have taken four days to
"find" the wreckage. In order to make the replicas consistent with
the official story, they would have to have been subjected to
brutal deaths, consistent with a high-speed plunge into the ocean
in a small aircraft. Because the replicas are created in a bath of
liquid, the medical examiners would easily have been fooled into
thinking that they were examining the real bodies.
WITNESS PROTECTION
As a final note to this article, any witnesses need to be made
aware that their only protection lies in coming forward with the
truth of what they know. Trying to keep silent out of fear to
stay alive has proven, time after time, to be a fatal prescription.
The more people that share in your knowledge of events, the more
likely you are to live, as killing becomes counterproductive for
the perpetrators. In the days and months ahead, as the truth
unfolds, be prepared for a rash of accidental deaths and suicides
-- of at least 10 witnesses to the crash who are refusing to come
forward, plus any involved directly in the "recovery" (moving) of
the crashed plane.
JFK_MAP.GIF
JFK_MAP.GIF