-Caveat Lector-

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/Aug1999/082799/civilliberties082799.
htm

Up against the wall civil liberties
By Justin Torres
CNS Senior Staff Writer
(CNSNews.com) - Are civil liberties becoming the latest casualty in
the war on crime? One author says yes.
In Warrior Cops: The Ominous Growth of Paramilitarism in
American Police Departments, published recently by the Cato
Institute, Diane Cecilia Weber tracks the increasing use of
paramilitary SWAT units in criminal cases across the U.S.
According to Weber, political pressure to show victories in the war
on drugs and violent crime may be driving some police departments
to use paramilitary tactics and weaponry that confuses the natures
of the police and the military - and may violate civil liberties.
"Politicians talk about a war on drugs, but who is the enemy, and
where is the front?" Weber told CNSNews.com from her home in
Charlottesville, Va. "In the meantime, we increasingly run the risk
of having SWAT teams break into homes and hold people at
gunpoint over trivial matters."
Cases like the suppression of the Branch Davidians in Waco, Tex.,
or the use of a SWAT team against Samuel Heflin in Colorado (as
reported earlier this week by CNSNews.com) are occurring with
greater frequency as police departments share training and
weaponry with military units.
That trend is a dangerous one, says Weber, because it confuses
the nature of the police with that of the military.
"The sharing of training and technology is producing a shared
mindset," Weber observed. "The problem is that the mindset of the
soldier is simply not appropriate for the civilian police officer."
In fact, said Weber, police and military should have distinctly
different mindsets, because they serve different needs and function
in different ways.
"The job of a police officer is to keep the peace, but not just by any
means. Police officers are expected to apprehend suspected
lawbreakers while adhering to constitutional procedures. They are
expected to use minimum force and to deliver suspects to a court
of law," Weber told CNSNews.com.
"The soldier, on the other hand, is an instrument of war. In boot
camp, recruits are trained to inflict maximum damage on enemy
personnel. Confusing the police function with the military function
can have dangerous consequences."
Weber also notes that the Founding Fathers specifically warned
against giving the police military powers. "They knew that police
had to be different from the military, or they could become agents
for tyranny."
While Weber stresses that most police officers involved in SWAT
team activity are "good people," nonetheless the system is set up
in such a way that there is no "check on bad cops who abuse the
power of the SWAT team. . . . There's no nationwide standards on
when SWAT team should or should not be used."
In most cases, said Weber, there is little need for a police
department to have a SWAT team. However, the media has
consistently supported SWAT activities, while downplaying the
problems it causes.
However, A.N. Moser, executive director of the National Sheriff's
Association, told CNSNews.com that SWAT teams are necessary
to fight crime effectively.
"If they aren't available, what is a sheriff supposed to do if he's
faced with criminals who have overwhelming weaponry?" said
Moser.
Moser agrees that the possibility exists that a SWAT team could
be used illegally, but says that most SWAT teams have effective
training.
"Training is a state and local issue, but as long as [SWAT team
members] are trained in the proper use of weaponry, physical
fitness, and constitutional law, they shouldn't have a problem."


Kathleen


"I have sworn upon the altar of god, eternal hostility against
every form of tyranny over the mind of man." - Thomas Jefferson (1800)

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to