-Caveat Lector-

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: P.R.Sarkar's Law of Social Cycles   5/5
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 00:52:10 -0100
From: Nurev Ind Research <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Nurev Independent Research
BCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

THE PROCESS OF SOCIAL CHANGE

Sarkar's law of social cycles states that power and influence shift from one
class to another in accordance with a certain pattern. Questions come to mind
at this point. First, is the change from one era to another smooth and
peaceful, or is it violent and marked by bloodshed? Second, does the rise and
fall of a class occur in perceptible stages within each era?

  A close analysis of civilizations reveals that during any era the dominant
class remains on top for at least two-thirds of that period. for instance, if
an intellectuals' era lasted for three hundred years, one would find that
during that period intellectuals ruled for at least two hundred years and
other groups for at most one hundred years.

  Because of overlapping transitional periods, one may not be able to
recognize a particular epoch of any society. The fact that nothing moves in a
straight line does present difficulties. But a serious student should be able
to see where a society stands at any moment in time. The following points
should be borne in mind in the study of history:

  1) In any society spread over several regions, one should first identify
the most important region. For instance, in Western civilization, which is
spread among many nations, America today is the most influential country,.
Since the U.S. is now passing through the acquisitive / laborer age, which is
marked by high crime, extreme materialism, generally loose morals, and
excessive individualism, we can say that the entire Western world is in this
age. It is possible that some regions of a society may differ from the most
important region. But that is not significant. What counts is the dominant
mentality in the dominant region of a society. For instance, Canada, another
member of Western civilization, is also in the acquisitive age , but it does
not suffer from high crime. ( This was written in 1986- as Canada moves
deeper and faster into the Acquisitive /Laborer era via NAFTA, the crime
aspect is comming to resemble the U.S. on a smaller scale.-- J2 ) However,
the character of Western society as a whole is determined not by the ruling
mentality in Canada, but by that in the United States.

  2) There may be more than one important region in a society at any given
time. Then the class ruling in the majority of such regions determines the
character of that society.

  3) Once dominant regions in a society have been identified , the next step
is to see which group is in power in those regions. Normally one should be
able to pinpoint the class controling the government either directly or
indirectly. That is, one should be able to see if warriors, intellectuals, or
acquisitors command pollitical power. For instance, a centralized government
with absolute authority usually means that either warriors or intellectuals
are at the helm. If it is not clear which group dominates politics, one
should examine the ideology popular in the society. Does it favor a warrior
attitude of adventure and fearlessness, or an intellectual's otherworldliness
and preference for theory over action, or an acquisitor's materialism over
the intellectual or adventurous persuits of mind?

  4) Another way to identify an era in society is to observe what the average
person admires most, which careers earn the greatest status, what the popular
culture glorifies. Does the common man seek a career in the army, or does he
want to become a poet, priest, or statesman, or does he aspire to be a big
landlord, banker, merchant, or businessman? In any society the profession of
the ruling class is the one most sought by the public. In a warrior age, the
average man generally dreams of becomming an army officer. In an era of
intellectuals, he aspires to become an infuential thinker, a theologian, or a
high placed pollitical adviser. In an acquisitive age, he seeks to become a
merchant, businessman, landlord, or financier. In a laborer age, people
usually become lazy, extremely materialistic, and greedy. They want to become
wealthy without working hard.

  Whereas in all phases of civilization, society consists of four broad
classes, AT THE END OF THE ACQUISITIVE ERA ONLY TWO REMAIN:
ACQUISITORS AND LABORERS-- ( Two tiered economies. Haves & have nots. - J2 )
warriors and intellectuals have been reduced to the laborering class by the
extreme concentration of wealth. For a long time in the acquisitive era, the
standard of living remains high and the other classes make their living by
providing services to the affluent. For a while, the entire social order works
to support the dominance of the rich. The concentration of wealth continues
apace, but since material resources available to society are limited, the
acquisitors grow richer and richer at the expence of the other classes.

  As wealth becomes concentrated, the living standard of the other three
progressively declines, until there comes a time when society degenerates
into two groups-- THE HAVES AND THE HAVE-NOTS. So strong is the power of want
and hunger that the distinctive features of the warrior's and intellectual's
minds submit to the compulsions of survival. It is during such dark days that
the acquisitive / laborer age comes into being. The resultant crime, poverty,
and malaise eventually INVITE THE REVOLT OF THE MASSES, who are led by
the very warriors and intellectuals-- now deminished to laborer ways of
thinking who had once embraced the acquisitive system with open arms.
Sarkar calls this upheaval THE LABORER REVOLUTION, one that occurs in the
terminal phase of the acquisitive era, contributes to its end, and is brought
about by disgruntled warriors and intellectuals.

  The laborer revolution reflects not the fact that it is engineered by the
laborer class, which is generally unable to lead, but the fact that it is
masterminded by those reduced to the laborer's level of poverty. Few warriors
and intellectuals then remain, for, forced to devote all their time to making
a living, they have little time for other persuits. The laborer revolution
sweeps aside the influence of wealth. In the ensuing society, which may arise
immediatly or after a brief period of adjustment, power reverts to the
warriors. [ Fascism? Dictatorship? Autocratic rule? -- J2]

  Today, Western society is passing thruogh another acquisitive / laborer
age. That is why there is so much conflict between wealthy corporations and
labor unions, something reminiscent of the conflict between landlords and
peasants in the feudal era; that is why there is so much crime, drug and
alchohol addiction, materialism, and general malaise in society today.

  This state of affairs cannot last long. SOCIAL CONFLICT WILL CONTINUE TO
GROW UNTIL THE ACQUISITIVE MENTALITY IS ELIMINATED AS THE DOMINANT FORCE.
( If done soon it can be done non-violently, and avoid the next phase which I
believe will end in social disintegration requiring autocratic or dictatorial
controls to restore " law and order ".  --J2 )
Society will then move into another warrior age.

[ R.B.]

Thanks for listening,
Joshua2

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to