-Caveat Lector- found on the net, at: http://www.mo-net.com/~nixit/sect1cn.html Dave Hartley http://www.Asheville-Computer.com http://www.ioa.com/~davehart President George Bush stated before the U.N. General Assembly on February 1, 1992, "It is to those sacred principles enshrined in the UN Charter that we must henceforth pledge our allegiance." President George Bush in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991, said "The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind." Brent Scowcroft, George Bush's National Security Advisor, said on the eve of the Gulf War. "A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order." President George Bush, September 11, 1990, said, "The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union)... Out of these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders." James P. Warburg, International Financier, "We shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." (James P. Warburg, member CFR, & International banker in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1950.) Arnold Toynbee, historian, "We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands", (1931 speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen) H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939) wrote, "... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people - will hate the new world order - and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people." Pope John Paul II said, "By the end of this decade (2000 AD) we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations ... a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable." (Quoted by Malachi Martin in the book "The Keys of This Blood.) Willy Brandt, former West German Chancellor, former chairman of the Fifth-Socialist International, chairman of the Brandt Commission in the late 1980s, said, "The New World Order is a world that has a supernational authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a World Development Fund that would make funds available to free and Communist nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order." Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations, December 1988, said, "Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a New World Order." Cord Meyer, Jr., of the United World Federalists, spelled out in his book, Peace or Anarchy a vital principle, "The UN must be given the constitutional authority to maintain security through laws which call for obedience from the individual inhabitants of the world as their first duty and which no government can override." President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, said, "...This regionalization is in keeping with the Trilateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of "one world government'. ...National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept..." Vice President Al Gore appeared hours after U.S. planes enforcing an allied 'no fly' zone over northern Iraq accidentally shot down two U.S. helicopters, killing 15 Americans and 11 foreign officials. 'I want to extend condolences,' Gore said, 'to the families of those who died in the service of the United Nations.'" (Los Angeles Times, 6/12/94) Kofi Annan said in 1992, while Assistant to the Secretary-General, "Sometimes you have to say 'damn sovereignty.' That issue what should be the international response to ethnic and other disputes is going to be the issue of the 1990's. What matters are really internal to a country? How do you define what really threatens international security?" President John Kennedy proposed that we reduce our national armies to a national police force, and allow the only large army in the world to be that of the United Nations. (State Department Document 7277, 1961.) Senator Joseph S. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate, March 1, 1962, about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever. "...This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States." President Harry Truman referred to the United Nations as the goal of a 'bi-partisan foreign policy.' He launched us into our first illegal and unconstitutional military action under the UN, without the consent of Congress. ======================= World Government? A reply to those who think the U.N. does not seek to govern the world. by Daniel D. New ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Remember your high school government class? They told us that in order to have a properly functioning government, certain things are required: a land mass, a population, a head of state, a body of law, a court system, a system of taxation, a military. The vision of a one-world government has been around for centuries, predicted by prophets and visionaries and utopians. Today the spectre of Globalism stalks the halls of national governments all over this planet. What rational person can argue that the United Nations is not moving in the direction of becoming a One-World Government? They claim a land mass - in this case the entire planet. They even tell you as you tour U.N. headquarters in New York that you are no longer in the USA, but on U.N. soil. They claim the population of the entire planet, even though the populace is largely unaware of it, and is a long way from swearing allegiance. They have a recognized head of state - today it is Kofi Annan, formerly the operational director of the debacle in Somalia. Every person who has ever occupied that position has been a Socialist of one form or another. They have a recognized body of law, encompassed in the United Nations Charter, which bears an enormous resemblance to that of the old USSR. They have a World Court system, headquartered in The Hague, and claiming the authority to try national citizens anywhere in the world, for 'crimes against humanity.' They do not have a system of taxation, YET. But they are working hard to implement the Tobin Tax scheme, with the endorsement of the Clinton administration, which will allow a myriad of taxes on international financial transfers and flights, oil and fishing and mining industries in international waters, etc. The amount will come to Billions of dollars, and will free the U.N. from having to come begging to its 'member states' for hand-outs and 'voluntary assessments.' But without the power to collect the taxes, this would be unenforceable. They have a limited military capacity, but not yet their own army, a prerequisite for enforcing one's will upon a world still suffering from the old concepts of national sovereignty. In 1997, there were over 50,000 Americans serving in United Nations military deployments somewhere in the world. In every case, their commanding officers signed an oath or a contract in which he agreed to disregard the national desires of ANY nation, including his own, serving instead the United Nations exclusively! In 1998, President Clinton contributed $200,000 in 'seed money' toward the establishment of a 'U.N. Stand-by Army' (we don't want to use the term forbidden by the U.S. Constitution, 'standing army,' do we?) Incursions into Macedonia and Somalia and Haiti and even Iraq are typical of the sort of International Colonialism we may come to expect over the next two decades. This strategy was best expressed and predicted by George Orwell, 'Perpetual war for perpetual peace.' The irrefutable documentation exists, for any objective student, which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that a One World Government is the goal of those who are the movers and shakers in the United Nations, and has been for over a century. Those who think the U.N. is simply a harmless debating society are guppies. Those who think that any government, by its very nature, can be benign are naive to the point of being dangerous to society. George Washington correctly pointed out that government is like fire, a useful servant and a fearful master. Our Founding Fathers feared the very nature of any government, and placed careful checks and balances on our own government. Those restraints began to erode almost immediately, but have preserved us as a sovereign nation for two centuries. Those restraints are not built into the pending One-World Government. The United Nations uses a multi-pronged approach to establishment of its authority. From the beginning, in the UN Charter, certain 'regional arrangements' were envisioned. Those regional alliances or arrangements came to be realized in NATO and SEATO, which actually mention the UN in their charters as their reason for existence. By having a bit of distance between them, these 'arrangements' which transcend national borders and national authority prepare people in each region to accept a higher power than their own government, thus eroding the concept of nationalism and preparing the people for World Citizenship. Have Americans lapsed so far into apathy and materialism that we value 'peace' more than 'freedom?' If so, then World Peace, through One-World Government can be arranged. At a price. Patrick Henry understood it. We would do well to study his writings and speeches. DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
