-Caveat Lector- Obviously, this has been an unbelievable CON JOB that started in 1917, when fellow Parasites, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb and Company, Prescott Bush, Max M. Warburg, and a few other traitors sent Leon Trotsky, with his 300 New York trained private army of street thugs, to Russia with $20,000,000 in gold to finance Lenin and start the Bolshevik Revolu- tion. These men started Communism for one reason: to promote the take- over of our nation of free people by Socialists so Americans would not be able to stand in the way of their New World Order plans. There was no way they could do this if America remained free, strong, and had no real threats to her security. For this reason, they built America an enemy! (There is not space here for a big history lesson regardless of the importance. For more of an honest review of our historic record read THE WORLD ORDER by Eustace Mullins. It can be obtained from Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization, P.O. Box 1105, Staunton, VA. 24401. AMERICANS WON'T NEED GUNS IN "UTOPIA" Police Officers must remember what the renowned H.L. Mencken said, "To die for an idea: it is unquestionable noble. But how much nobler it would be if men died for ideas that were true." Officers are told the reason the guns have to be removed from the American People is to stop crime and the killing of the innocent. This is a fabrication. Truthfully, the only reason the guns must be removed is to stop any chance of our countrymen raising up and throwing off the "wonderful" programs that their "philanthropic" government leaders have planned for them. It is time to seriously consider what each of us will do when these Global elitists in our government instruct OFFICERS and NATIONAL GUARDSMEN to go forth and take the guns away from the armed, good people of your city or town ... "FOR THEIR OWN GOOD". Most Officers know the day will come when they will have to make that very hard decision on this gun removal issue. The evidence is all around us that this day is near. Consider the imperialist NWO position. For the World Elite to truly en- joy their "utopian" Socialist Society, the subject masses must not have the a means to protect themselves against more "voluntary compliance". When one grasps this logical position, there is no longer any question about it: THE GUNS WILL HAVE TO GO. IF THERE ARE ANY Officers who still doubt this, we are about to prove this planned scenario to you. Keep in mind that the second part of the three-part plan of the NWO Regional Government program (which precedes the One World Government) is that Canada, USA, Mexico and South and Central America are to be combined into one Region. Hence, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is on FAST-TRACK with the backing of our notorious NWO President, NWO Congressmen, Senators and Gover- nors. The other 2 parts presently in the works are: First part - the uniting of the European Nations (Common Market), and #3 - the uniting of the Asian Nations. These make up the "TRI" [3] parts of the Tri-lat- eral One World Government. Understanding this well planned program will make the following "PER- SONAL PROTECTION" proclamation more clear to any doubting bobbies. The following is a recent declaration from the government of Australia, which is a member of the British commonwealth. The Canadians, our soon to be northern countrymen, are also a British Commonwealth. Question: When we are merged with the British Commonwealth by the Elitist NWO Parasites will we assume these British Socialist anti-gun laws or will they assume ours? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | LEGAL NOTICE | | | | PERSONAL PROTECTION | | IS NO REASON | | TO HAVE A GUN | | | | If you own a gun which you keep to protect yourself, your | | family, or your property, you must dispose of it legally. | | Under the latest gun laws, personal and property protection | | are no longer considered acceptable reasons to possess any type | | of firearm, or to get a licence. | | If you wish to possess any gun, you must have a licence and | | meet the new requirements for safe storage of the weapon and its | | ammunition. When your current licence expires you must reapply if | | you want to continue to possess or use a gun. Be warned, making | | a false or misleading statement on your licence application could | | earn you ten years in prison. | | Act quickly, if you haven't got a licence, now is the time to | | either apply for one, or legally dispose of your gun. One way you | | can do this is at your local police station. Possession and use of | | any firearm for personal or property protection is illegal and will | | attract severe penalties. No exceptions, no excuses. | | | | NSW POLICE SERVICE | | | | RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERSHIP | | | | The new South Wales Government | | Putting people first by managing better | | | | 96 - SUNDAY TELEGRAPH, JUNE 14, 1992 - 96 | | | | LEGAL NOTICE | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Realizing that the plan is to merge us Americans, Latin Americans, and Canadians, into one Region, you already know whose gun policies we are to adopt. (Mexico has the very same limited gun rights as Canada and Australia.) DON'T WORRY. BE HAPPY, OFFICER! Officers should not worry. There is a "good" plan to get the guns away from your fellow Americans. Should Officers be concerned - just because this "good" plan calls for them to go get 200,000,000 firearms (BATF figures are very low) away from 250,000,000 very "peaceful and coopera- tive" citizens? What do you think? SOME "AN EASY MARK" Some guns will be easily removed. Many unsuspecting (and very naive) Americans will turn in their "liberty teeth" (means of personal protec- tion when told to do so. Every officer knows such people in the commun- ity, i.e. those "good" citizens who are too scared to oppose anything their government tells them to do. Yes, even if they know it's wrong, they will go along or just keep their mouths shut. Every captive nation has a large percentage of such people. These are the "production units" (PU's) that will fit very well into the New World Order. They are ready made slaves. As strange as it may seem, many of these "sheep" still believe that they can trust and believe in our government to SAVE THEM from anarchy. This is amusing to some of our government officials and Police Offi- cers. It amazes them that these people are so unaware of what is happening and continue trusting the same government that has planned and promoted the anarchy in the streets in the first place - precise- ly to scare them into submission. (See Aid & Abet Police Newsletter 2-2.) L.A. RIOTS - AN ORCHESTRATION. A prime example was the recent L.A. riots. The beating of King was not part of the plan, but it offered a grand opportunity to accomplish three important things for the Globalists. 1) Get rid of Chief Gates, who for years had stood in the way of Socialist -NWO gang member, Tom Bradley and others involved in trying to get the L.A. Police Dept. into the coming national police force. (See soon to be released book, THE CENTRALIZATION OF U.S. POLICE POWERS, available from U.S. Federal Law Research Center, P.O. Box 8712, Phx. AZ. 85066.) 2) Further convince the People that their only salvation from crime and evil in society will be found in the "protection" provided by a global government. 3) A grand opportunity for Globalists George, Pete and Tom to practice FEMA style Martial Law. It matters little that some among the masses have to die. Remember, the new government philosophy is the same as that of the Communist, "THE END DOES INDEED JUSTIFY THE MEANS." Once again, the masses were to think that everything was out of con- trol. It was not (the riots were planned). But it was a good enough reason that in a matter of hours, 2,000 U.S. Marines were on the streets of an American city. This was a very important test. A most severe breach of Constitutional law was brought to bear; and more importantly, the people said nothing. The masses complained only that the government should have acted sooner and in greater strength. For, when there is anarchy in the streets the "sheep" do not care who saves them. This planned Martial Law scenario actually worked out better than the NWO social planners ever expected. DETECTIVE BROWN SPEAKS OUT Los Angeles County Sheriff's Detective Larry Brown speaking in Phoenix, Arizona August 1992 stated that there was more behind the riots than the public knows. He revealed that known agitators from the Revolution- ary Communist Party (RCP), Socialist Worker's Party (SWP), Progressive Labor Party (PLP) Socialist Organizing Network (SON), were there to press for a riot before it started and some members of these organiza- tionsparticipated in the rioting, looting, and arson. He said that Mayor Bradley gave a very inflammatory statement that was broadcast on L.A. T.V. before the riots. He states, what many Police Officers already know, that Mayor Bradley has strongly supported the Communist Party USA since he first ran for mayor. Also, he received support from the ACLU, and National Lawyers Guild (Both pro-Communist groups.) In his 1969 bid to become mayor his political manager was Communist Party functionary Don Rothenberg. Gus Hall, the Director of the Communist Party U.S.A. came to L.A. to tell the Communists to help elect Bradley. Some of our fellow Officers in Southern California believe, after eval- uation of the evidence and results, that the outcome of the trial was planned by certain government officials and carried out with precision by the judge and prosecutor. We believe they are right. How did they manipulate the jury? (Read Aid & Abet Police Newsletter Vol.1 Num. 10, that addresses the science of how this is accomplished.) There is no doubt that it was understood what a NOT GUILTY verdict would accomp- lish. But, that's another story. (See Aid & Abet Vol.2, Num. 1 and Num. 2., which covers other parts of this incredible well-laid plan for cre- ating anarchy in the streets and TERROR in the hearts of U.S. citizens. The goal: To get the citizens to give up their Bill of Rights so that their government can make the streets "safe again" through global gov- ernment.) BACK TO "GETTING THEM GUNS!" Officers should keep in mind that some of the guns are not going to be easily removed. For instance, those owned by true patriots - those freedom-loving Americans who know, without a doubt, what's coming next if they give up their guns. It should not be a surprise to Police Officers that many good Americans will not walk meekly into NEW WORLD ORDER slavery. And there are few Officers who would want it any other way. So the question each Officer individually must face is a very difficult but realistic one: "Which way will your own gun face when the orders are issued?" Will you protect the people you have sworn to protect? Or, will you do what other patriotic officers from other countries have done to their countrymen, "obediently just follow orders"? Every Police Officer/Military soldier in every enslaved nation on earth has had to face this same question. Certainly, it's an individual de- cision whether or not to take lethal action against fellow countrymen when ordered to take their weapons (and with them their liberty). But, each Officer will make that decision. OFFICER, WILL YOU KILL FELLOW COUNTRYMEN WHEN ORDERED TO TAKE THEIR WEAPONS? Perhaps it will help that you will be told by superiors, "It's for the national good", and/or, "It's for the good of society." (His- tory proves that the nations' Enforcers can expect some such motiva- tional indoctrination such as this.) Could there be such a police action, taken against the public, if the police were told the truth, i.e. "that officers should take the guns and liberties from the masses so that the Controlling Elite of the nation can enslave them"? We think not. Why not? Because national Police Enforcers are not mercenaries; they are always highly patriotic and would not do such a thing as enslaving their countrymen, unless in some manner they were totally convinced that it was the only thing to do to save the country, "the patriotic" thing to do... "FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY" don't you know! "CRIMINALS" EVERY ONE Actually, it may not be a difficult decision for some Police Officers and National Guardsmen, because before it comes time to take the guns, all these terrible, "radical RESISTERS with those nasty guns" will have been branded as "CRIMINALS OF THE STATE". And as you and I know, we have been trained that there is little wrong with killing an armed and resisting "criminal". RIDICULOUS? Have you ever wondered exactly how governments throughout recent history have gotten local and state Police Officers in other enslaved nations to participate in executing their own citizens. This is accomplished by labeling them "criminals". (Piece of Cake!) It is not a figment of someone's imagination that thousands of unarmed fathers, mothers and children have been shot to death by their local police, while attempting to run or climb to freedom. It is through a process of indoctrination that the very best Officers - highly patri- otic Officers - are brought to the point mentally where they can be counted on to do such things. Remember, it is always accomplished by convincing the best officers: "It is a necessary and patriotic thing to do." PATRIOTIC AMERICANS WILL FIGHT TO THE DEATH Police officers would do well not to see the above title as only part of the script out of a John Wayne movie. We should consider, with utmost seriousness, that if good Americans (including internal protectors) allow this plan of the Globalists to get this far, it can be expected that casualties among Police Officers, National Guardsmen, and armed "criminal" patriotic citizens will be very high before the gun removal process can be successfully completed. (If indeed it can be completed.) But, with Police Officers and Guards- men serving as the "cannon fodder" to enforce the Globalist plan, these deaths will be merely "acceptable loses" to those giving the orders and looking down from their safe and secure Ivory Towers. It is therefore entirely relevant that our brothers and sisters decide very soon which side they will serve in the setting up of this "Uto- pian" Global Society. They must not be fooled by government officials that tell that that all men and women with American blood running through their veins will walk gently into lifelong servitude. It cannot be contradicted that a great many out there on the other end of those half-billion "liberty teeth" (guns) still underscore the statement of J.J. Rousseau: "I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery." INTELLIGENT Americans read and study history. On the other hand, the vast majority of government "leaders", "educators" and media persons apparently don't! Concerning the 2nd Amendment, for example, they try to tell us that the Founding Fathers meant for only the Organized Militia (National Guard) to have weapons. Please read the quotes given below and decide: Could these countrymen have spoken any more plainly? "NO FREE MAN SHALL EVER BE DE-BARRED THE USE OF ARMS. THE STRONGEST REASON FOR THE PEOPLE TO RETAIN THEIR RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS IS AS A LAST RESORT TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AGAINST TYRANNY IN GOVERNMENT." - THOMAS JEFFERSON "THE SAID CONSTITUTION SHALL NEVER BE CONSTRUED TO AUTHORIZE CONGRESS TO PREVENT THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS FORM KEEPING THEIR OWN ARMS." - SAM ADAMS "THE GREAT OBJECT IS THAT EVERY MAN BE ARMED. EVERYONE WHO IS ABLE MAY HAVE A GUN." PATRICK HENRY "AMERICANS NEED NEVER FEAR THEIR GOVERNMENT BECAUSE OF THE ADVANTAGE OF BEING ARMED, WHICH THE AMERICANS POSSESS OVER THE PEOPLE OF ALMOST EVERY OTHER NATION." - JAMES MADISON Well now, those statements are really ambiguous aren't they?! Don't you wish our Founders would have stated clearly what was on their minds? Why are our school children lied to by Establishment educators about this? You know the answer, don't you? Good NWO slaves will not need guns. And that is exactly what our children will have to look forward to if American Police Officers and National Guardsmen don't say "NO" TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER. Here are several othe statements about the importance of guns in the hands of the masses: VLADIMIR I. LENIN: "...one of the basic conditions for the victory of socialism is the arming of the workers (Communist) and the disarming of the bourgeoisie (the middle class)." GEORGE KEENAN, 1964: "Popular revolt against a ruthless, experienced modern dictatorship, which enjoys a MONOPOLY OVER WEAPONS and COMMUNI- CATIONS, ... is simply not a possibility in the modern age." (U.S. con- spirators already control the major communications sources, now they have to - GET THE GUNS!) LEO TOLSTOY, 1893: "Governments need armies to protect them against their enslaved and oppressed subjects." And one of our own: PROFESSOR DEAN MORRIS, Government employee, Director of Law Enforce- ment Assistance Administration (LEAA), in testimony to Congress stated: "I am one who believes that as a first step the U.S. should move expe- ditiously to disarm the civilian population, other than police and security officers, of all handguns, pistols and revolvers ... no one should have a right to anonymous ownership or use of a gun." His government LEAA administration would later publish, "There can be no right of privacy in regard to armament ... We seek a disarmed populace." Our government now tells us that they "disbanded" LEAA. FACT: They removed the name and address, but every tenant of the LEAA program is still in place and the goal and time table is precisely on course. (See book, U.S. Centralization of Police Powers.) Who was it that said these words? "If the opposition (citizen) disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves." All those Officers who answered, "Pete Wilson", "George Bush", "Willie Clinton", or "Ross Perot", you are wrong. It was actually JOSEF STALIN. A simple mistake! Perhaps as a last HURRAH in closing this section on U.S. citizens re- taining their guns, we should heed the cry of a recent victim of anti- gun legislation. In 1990, a female student from Beijing, Red China, described her parents last words to her: "Tell the American people never to lose their guns. As long as they keep their guns in their hands, what happened here will never happen there." (Amen!) BEFORE YOU CAN SEE WHAT IS WRONG, YOU MUST KNOW WHAT IS RIGHT Freedom can exist only in the society of knowledge. Without learning, men are incapable of knowing their rights, ... Dr. Benjamin Rush - 1786: We should recall, from the section entitled "New Age Professors", what DR. CHESTER PIERCE, Harvard University Professor, Humanist, New World Order Guru instructs teachers and those students who aspire to become teachers of our children, namely: "Every child in America who enters school at the age of five is mentally ill, because he comes to school with an allegi- ance to our institutions, toward the preservation of this form of government that we have. Patriotism, nationalism, and sov- ereignty, all that proves that children are sick because a truly well individual is one who has rejected all of those things, and is truly the international child of the future." Once we gain an understanding of the "money issue", it is not difficult to understand how NWO promoters gained control of our institutions of higher learning where public school teachers, who taught us and are now teaching our children, got their training. I can assure you that we, and our children, did not reject "allegiance to our institutions ... Patriotism, nationalism, and sovereignty." But we were never taught the doctrines of the freedom principles upon which this nation was founded. Instead, we were indoctrinated with Socialist doctrines, reinforced by a controlled media. Most of our teachers did not do this consciously. The teachers themselves did not determine what was to be taught to our children, they just went along to get along. [Like many of us are still doing.] And, those few who had enough in- sight to protest were quietly removed from the school system. Fortunately, we can quickly remedy that situation. There is now avail- able an IBM compatible computer program published by THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW LIBRARY which contains all the documents necessary: "THAT THE GREAT, GENERAL, AND ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES OF LIBERTY AND FREE GOVERNMENT MAY BE RECOGNIZED ..." Our founders left us the tools we need, not only to learn to recognize the "ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES OF LIBERTY AND FREE GOVERNMENT", but they also left us the legal tools to reclaim those liberties and freedoms. We only need to learn what those tools are and how to use them. Volume 1 of the CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW LIBRARY contains the full text of the Bill of Rights of ALL 50 STATES, the full text of the U.S. Constitution, The Declaration of Causes and the Necessity of Taking up Arms, The Declaration of Independence, The Declaration of Rights, The Northwest Ordinance, The Articles of Confederation and more ... UNDERSTANDING THE VALUE OF THESE DOCUMENTS In a very real sense, most of the documents contained within the CCLL program can be considered suppressed simply because they were not, until now, readily available to citizens. Consequent- ly, not one citizen in ten thousand has ever read his own States constitution or it's Bill of Rights. The irony is that the documents themselves state that their primary purpose is "THAT THE GREAT, GENERAL, AND ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES OF LIBERTY AND FREE GOVERNMENT MAY BE RECOGNIZED AND ESTABLISHED ..." Many of these documents explicitly state that their specific in- tention is that ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES BE RECOGNIZED. The Founding Fathers recognized that, without learning these essential princi- ples, citizens would be unable to maintain their liberty and free government could not be maintained. We repeat: Freedom can exist only in the society of knowledge. Without learning, men are incapable of knowing their rights, ... Dr. Benjamin Rush - 1786: To truly understand and appreciate the value of these documents, we need to study them not merely with respect to the information they contain but more specifically to the purpose they intended to serve for it is the intent of the lawmaker that constitutes the law. As one writer put it, "These documents are the Scriptures of our American Heritage of liberty and freedom." Starting with the Declaration of Independence, we learn their source and purpose. They are the laws derived from the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God" that circumscribe the limitations of power and authority entrusted to the men in government. As such, they are the legal basis by which America citizens, as individuals, are to judge whether or not those bounds have been exceeded or if Government has become destructive of the ends for which it was instituted. First, there is natural law which stands as an eternal rule to all men, and which is to govern even the government itself. The laws of nature are called the laws of God because they are de- rived from the same source. It is called the Common Law because it is Common to all men, at all times, and in all places. It sets the bounds of all men including the men in government who possess no powers not delegated by the people themselves. And the people can not delegate powers they themselves do not possess. There- fore, if an individual cannot perform an act without commiting a crime, trespass or tort; then he cannot delegate that authority to his representatives in government. It is this which sets the bounds of government. Second, government power is only a fiduciary power which has been established by the people only to act for certain ends. Yet, there remains in the people a supreme power to remove the men in government and alter the government itself when they find that they are acting contrary to the trust reposed in them. These are the basic principles which are concisely stated in the Declaration of Independence, and which inform us of the ends for which our governments and constitutions were established. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are insti- tuted among Men, ... That whenever any Form of Government becomes destruc- tive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, ... DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE The Declaration of Independence tells us that the sole and exclu- sive purpose for which government was established was to secure the God given birth rights of every American citizen. This pur- pose is restated and elaborated on in the Constitution of the State of Alabama: That the sole object and only legitimate end of government is to protect the citizen in the enjoy- ment of life, liberty, and property, and when the government assumes other functions it is usurpation and oppression. ALABAMA, DECLARATION OF RIGHTS ARTICLE I. Section 35. The founding of America was truly a political miracle. It was the only Government the world has ever seen that was founded upon the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" and instituted for the sole and exclusive purpose of securing and protecting God Given inalienable rights. The Constitution was purposely designed to place strict limitations upon Government to insure that it did not stray from this purpose and become like all the other Governments the world has known. It was not instituted to grant rights and privileges, to regulate the lives and rule over its citizens. It was not empowered to pass and enforce any law it deemed good. No power was given to make any law that would abolish, abrogate, diminish, or restrict any right. Nor was any power granted that would allow the men in Government to amend the Constitution by any process not authorized by the Constitution itself. These powers were expressly prohibited. Many of these rights are spelled out in these documents which are Supreme Law and are applicable in all 50 states. This Constitution, ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, ... U.S. Constitution, Article VI. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Sec. 2. Under these provisions of the U.S. Constitution, the rights enumerated in one State's Bill of Rights are as valid in the courts of the other 49 States as they are in the State where they are listed. In addition, the rights spelled out in the Northwest Ordinance are equally protected and applicable in the courts of all 50 States by the following provision: All ... Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution as under the Confederation. U.S. Constitution, Article VI. Those Americans who place a high value on the freedom we inherited from our ancestors will find these documents to be a real gold mine with extremely valuable nuggets scattered throughout them. While a great deal of this material may seem repetitious, a slight change in wording in one document can give a whole new understanding and appreciation of the intent of a given provision. These documents are not simply electronically recorded words, they are, as the writer mentioned above put it, "the Scriptures of our American Heritage the study of which is sacredly oblig- atory on all." In any case, they are Supreme Law and mighty wea- pons in the armory of educated warriors who value their freedom and are determined to preserve and restore the God given freedoms guaranteed and secured by these Supreme Laws. Those of us who are concerned with preserving and restoring the freedoms we inherited from our ancestors are often asked, Where in the Constitution does it say that you have this or that right; Or, we are accused of being "Constitutionalists" or "Constitu- tional purists"; Or, have been told that the Constitution is a "living or elastic document" (meaning it is subject to changing interpretations, expansions and contractions, by the men in government, to keep step with changing times and conditions). Such questions, accusations and statements are signs of abysmal ignorance of very basic and fundamental freedom principles. Such apathetic ignorance and complacency stems from strong, yet com- fortable, delusions of freedom and security that is a reflection of America's past greatness but that has little or nothing to do with present day reality. And, coming from public officials who have taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic; they are ominous signs that America is in great danger of passing into history as an exper- iment in freedom and self-government that has failed. To demonstrate the value of these documents, we can use them to answer all of the above. The rights enumerated in this Bill of Rights shall not be construed to limit other rights of the people not therein expressed. Virginia Declaration of Rights You will find similar provisions in more than 20 States Bills of Rights. It would have been impossible for our Founding Fathers to enumerate all of our God-given rights, they are limited only by the rights of others. Under the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God", "all men are created equal" and no individual and no group of individuals calling themselves a "democracy" or "government" have a moral or legal right to invade another's rights to life, liberty and property - either themselves or through their representatives. Absolute, arbitrary power over the lives, liberty and property of freemen exists nowhere in a republic, not even in the largest majority. Wyoming Declaration of Rights Art. I, Sec. 7 This identically worded provision can also be found in the Kentucky Declaration of Rights - Art. I, Sec. 2. This provision goes much deeper than it appears on the surface and is worthy of careful reflection. As to both the accusation of being a "Constitutional Purist" and the Statement that the Constitution is a "Living or elastic document," we can let the following answer for us: In the words of the Father of his Country, we declare that ... "the constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all." Rhode Island Declaration of Rights Article I, Section I If we study these documents in the light of this provision of the Rhode Island Declaration of Rights, we will begin to see just how far America has strayed from the basic and fundamental freedom principles upon which it was founded. We will find that a great deal in our constitutions that has never been changed by "an explicit and authentic act of the whole people" is totally ignored today. The question we should ask is, by what authority were they changed? I would strongly suggest that as we study these documents, we keep the following key words uppermost in mind: "Supreme Law" and "Sacredly Obligatory". We should also make a special effort to fully understand the following provision that will be found in many other State Constitutions. That frequent recurrence to fundamental principles, ... are absolutely necessary to preserve the bless- ings of liberty, and (to) keep government free; the people ... have a right, in a legal way, to exact a due and constant regard to them, from their Legisla- tors and magistrates, in making and executing ... ... laws ... Vermont Declaration of Rights Article 18th. Carefully note the words "absolutely necessary". The question becomes, how can we possibly "preserve the blessings of liberty, and keep government free" and "exact a due and constant regard to them (fundamental principles) from ... legislators and magis- trates ..." if we are apathetically ignorant of what those principles are? The answer, of course, is that we can't. From this, we can see the priceless value of these documents and the urgent need to study and distribute them to others. This brings up another critically important topic relative to these documents. Modern propaganda and legal practice has it that you must be a Licensed Lawyer before you are qualified to understand the "legal meaning" or "interpretation" of our laws and, therefore, the provisions in these documents which are the foundation of all of our laws; and, thereby to, demand a due observation and constant regard of them by our legislators, magistrates and other public officials. Some of us have even been accused of the "crime" of practicing law without a licence when we have attempted to help others defend their rights. This is a throw back to the Dark Ages where the layman could have no intercourse with God's laws save through the intermediary of priests who were qualified members of the clergy in good standing with the hierarchy. Today, the only difference is that those "intermediaries" between citizen "laymen" and the "Laws" are called lawyers and their "superiors in Black Robes" are called judges, and their courts of Chancery are pretending to be courts of law. I can assure you that the great majority of the founding stock of this nation who demanded and insisted that Bills of Rights be attached to their Constitutions were not lawyers and that they fully understood the limits of the powers they were entrusting to the men in government. In fact, in many Colonies, lawyers were considered vermin and parasites, and were even banished in some of them. This is such a critically important topic that we should in- quire further into the thought of the Revolutionary generation. In effect, John Locke who was considered the ideological progenitor of the American Revolution and who, by far, was the most often non-biblical writer quoted by our Founding Fathers said - any single man must judge for himself whether circum- stances warrant obedience or resistance to the commands of the civil magistrate; we are all qualified, entitled, and morally obliged to evaluate the conduct of our rulers. This political judgement, moreover, is not simply or primarily a right, but like self-preservation, a duty to God. As such it is a judgement that men cannot part with according to the God of Nature. It is the first and foremost of our inalienable rights without which we can preserve no other. To this idea, that has been propagated by the legal profession for so many years now that only lawyers and judges are qualified to understand and interpret the "legal meaning" of our laws, let's examine the statement of one of this nation's ideological Founding Fathers: To say that subjects in general are not proper judges (of the law) when their governors oppress them and play the tyrant, and when they defend their rights ... is as great a treason as ever a man uttered. Tis treason not against one single man, but against the state - against the whole body politic; tis treason against mankind; tis treason against Common sense; tis treason against God; And this impious principle lays the foundation for justifying all the tyranny and oppression that ever any prince was guilty of. The people know for what end they set up and maintain their governors, and they are the proper judges when governors execute their trust as they ought to do it. -Johnathan Mayhew It is clear that this "impious principle" perpetrated by a self serving legal profession is not recognized by Americans because they have never learned the essential principles of liberty and free government. The implementation of this principle has created an Aristocratic form of government contrary to the Constitution. Under the pretence of a merger of law and equity, "law" has been replaced by "equity" administered by self-appointed "Aristocrats" who are the only ones qualified to judge the law. Jurors are not lawyers. So, they are told they can only determine the facts in a case but are required to accept the law as the judge (aristocrat) gives it to them even if it violates their own conscience. ... the jury in all criminal cases, shall be the judges of the law and the facts. Georgia, Declaration of Rights, Art.I, Sec.II, Para. I This provision appears in many of these documents. Yet, jurors, ignorant of freedom principles, allow judges to deny them and the defendant the right to have the jury determine the law. Defend- ants are not even allowed to argue Constitutional principles to the jury because they are not "qualified" to know and understand the "legal meaning" and "interpretation" of the law. In other words they are not "proper judges" of the law. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedoms of the people by gradual and silent encroach- ment of those in power than by violent and sudden usurp- ations. -James Madison "Without learning, men are incapable of knowing their rights ..." Therefore, they are incapable of recognizing these "gradual and silent encroachments" on their freedoms and liberties. It was well known during America's Revolutionary period that Government was not the source of rights. It wasn't just Thomas Jefferson who claimed that men "are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights," he merely restated what everyone was thinking. Kings or parliaments could not GIVE THE RIGHTS ESSEN- TIAL TO HAPPINESS ... We claim them from a higher source - from the King of Kings, and Lord of all the earth. They are not annexed to us by parchments and seals. They are created in us by the decrees of Providence. John Dickerson - 1766 As we continue to examine these documents, we will begin to understand that our Founding Fathers placed the responsibility for the future fate of our Republic directly into the hands of the people as there was no other safe repository. It was left to the people themselves, as individuals, to preserve the integrity of the principles of liberty and free government. The duty and obligation to scrutinize the "laws of nature" and the laws contained herein which flowed from them for the knowledge requisite for preserving our legacy of freedom and liberty is not merely optional on our part, it is "absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty, and keep government free" as we saw in the Vermont Bill of Rights. America was established as a nation of laws and not of men. And the laws contained herein are those laws. America's traditions do not have a life of their own. They must be sustained by living commitments. People must give them life continuously or they will expire - especially when they are under attack as they are today. In summary, the problem is not that we have forgotten freedom principles, but that the great majority of us have never learned them. It is my fervent hope that this program will make a contribution toward rectifying that sitution. Volume 1 of the CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW LIBRARY puts a vast data base of "essential" freedom movement information at your fingertips, and more important, you can obtain a 100% complete and fully functional evaluation copy for only $2.00. Use the registration order form from the exit screen to obtain your copy today! Or write today to: TED PEDEMONTI 18-K HARTFORD AVE. ENFIELD, CT. 06082 NOTE: This file is not in the printed version of Operation Vampire Killer 2000, but has been added by THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW LIBRARY as a preview of Volume I of that library. REMEMBER: IT CAN'T WORK WITHOUT YOU Now realize that for any plan, that would subjugate Americans, to have any chance to succeed, the people's protectors must go against their solemn oath, turn on the people, and assist other seditionists and traitors in such criminal acts. So we must ask our fellow Officers again, "Will they be like those who have used pathetic statements such as, 'WELL, IT'S THE LAW, SO I HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO ENFORCE IT.'"? As many Officers know, that has been the lame excuse offered by the People's "Protectors" in all the Marxist nations of the world during the last 75 years of totalitarian rule. Fine, dedicated, HIGHLY PATRIOTIC (and brainwashed) police officers by the millions UPHELD THE "LAW" in these other countries, and went on to round up and execute 170 million of their own countrymen because they were told by their leaders that "to save their nation" they must do these things. HOW COULD THEY DO THAT? Every time a nation's officers have committed such acts against their own people it was because of their deep patriotism that they were easily brainwashed into believing these types of activities were in their nation's best interest. (Of course, as mentioned earlier, these 170 million people were labeled "CRIMINALS" of the state.) "BUT I WAS ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS", has always been the most popular "last words" of obedient government officers. Least we forget Nuremberg! "BUT, IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE", some will say. Let me tell you that it is already happening here, and many officers know it. It is now well known that Governor Pete Wilson has just declared 500,000-plus good Americans to be "felons" -CRIMINALS OF THE STATE- for not obeying his unconstitutional gun restrictions by March 30th of 1992. The U. S. Congress, and some other states and cities are in the process of doing the same thing. REMEMBER, we already spoke about how much easier it is to kill armed "criminals"? AND SO IT BEGINS. PEOPLE'S PROTECTORS ARE AWAKENING! Be of good cheer! All over this nation Officers, Guardsmen and military personnel are awakening to this oncoming planned disaster. Many are beginning to take a stand against the NEW WORLD ORDER Bloodsuckers. They now understand that if they do not side with the people, but allow themselves to be used to enslave the masses, they will become the ENEMY, KEEPERS, and EXECUTIONERS of their own countrymen. WILL OUR "OPERATION VAMPIRE KILLER 2000" PLAN WORK? WHO ARE YOU? By A. Rick Dalton Fellow Officer: Have you ever considered just who you are? Do you realize that you are the "thin blue line" between civilized society and lawlessness? You have been entrusted with the collective right to self-protection for thousands of american citizens who depend on you. You and I are, in our own sphere of operations and influence, among the most important and powerful people on earth! We have had awesome given to us, and we must never forget that we are, first and foremost, DEFENDERS, not PUNISHERS of the people. We must honor and hold sacred the God-given rights of the people which we defend. And we must use our influence, our discretion and some- times our authority to protect these inalienable rights. ---------- Our plan to shut down the Establishment's NWO Slave State by re- educating and returning the patriotic People's Servants and Protectors to the side of the People is working as we speak. Here is a fine example. A PERSONAL TESTIMONY Let this old cop relate one of many recent, memorable meeting I've had with fellow patriot Police Officers and Guardsmen. I was a guest speaker at the Seattle, Washington Preparedness Expo in 1991, which drew a crowd of 5,000-plus concerned Americans. At each of my talks there were many fine federal, state and local police officers and military persons in the audience. I was privileged to meet a number of these good patriot Officers and to be able to speak with them after my speeches. I recall in particular two Officers who worked as partners for the local police department. I can't tell you how impressed I was with their expression of their love for their fellow Americans and their country. They promised me that they would go forward from the Expo, study and share their knowledge and concerns with their police colleagues. As the reader will soon see, they did exactly that. Read below the first published article written by these two grand American Police Officers, and addressed to their peers. WE HAVE THE POWER Officers A.J. Seitz and Mike Lewis Puyallup Police Department, WA. Mike writes: When A.J. and I first informed people that we were going to start writing an article on the U. S. Constitution, we received mixed responses. Some of our fellow officers were sharpening their pencils preparing to write a rebuttal until they saw the piece (no, not A.J.'s HK-91. I'm talking about the article.) The article was primarily written as an opening statement just to get the ball rolling and hopefully make people probe into their beliefs and ideals. Several comments were made as to whether we wore white hoods when we wrote the article. We neither support nor condone the activities of the K.K.K. or any other similar organization. What we do believe in is the U. S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. This is something that every officer has sworn to protect and serve. Yet, it's amazing the number of people, officers included, that really don't know what the Bill of Rights contain and where it is applicable in the field of Law Enforcement. How many of you can recite the first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth and the eighth amendment if asked by a citizen? These listed are primarily used in our profession. Of course, we all have some idea that freedom of speech, religion and search and seizure are in there somewhere, but most are not exactly sure what else is in there. We all know that the Constitution and Bill of Rights supersedes all other laws. It gives the people the right to govern themselves as they see fit. It was our founding fathers' goal to not have a totalitarian state such as England. How many of us have been dismayed over the passage of a new law, with the knowledge that the act would not be practical on the street, or just does not sound quite legal? All we do is bitch or enforce it unquestionable. It goes no further than that. We as a people (especially police officers) have a great amount of power. Let's begin to use it! We want you only to have an open mind, which for some will be tough, I know. Do something for yourself. LIFE MAGAZINE has a special Fall edition solely based on the Bill of Rights. Take one home (Well, pay for it first!) and read it. You'd be surprised at what you find. Plus it will be great for your kids' future history papers. All we ask is that you search your own soul and question yourself if you are upholding the people's right, or are you upholding the Federal and State Legislative wishes. A. J. writes: As Officer Lewis said above, some people, including officers, feel that when a person uses the Bill of Rights as supportive material to an argument on a social issue, then the person must be a radical. Perhaps if you are pro-government control, I guess you're right. However, were our founding fathers radicals against the English government when they were fighting for our freedom? Since we are discussing the right of the people to govern themselves, fellow officers label us "right wing extremists". This brings us top the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." This has been said to be the cornerstone of all other rights, yet this right seems to be constantly under attack by politicians who owe allegiance to special interest groups, as in the political correctness issue. This has obviously irritated the citizens of this country, which can be seen by the recent election across the nation, where several special interest politicians were voted out of office, and in our own state where term limitation nearly passed. One of the reasons that the government is in this state (excessive taxation, creating tighter government control, and any of the other topics people complain about) is that the people have little knowledge about the history of our government. One example is the Sedition law. In 1797, John Adams, a Federalist, beat Thomas Jefferson, a Republican, by three votes for the presidency. In 1798, Jefferson and Madison opposed an imminent war with France. The Federalists, who had close ties with the Plutocrats (rule by the wealthy) in England, passed the sedition law. Bouviers law dictionary defines sedition as "a revolt against legitimate authority, the raising of commotions and disturbances in the state or advocacy or suggestion by word, act, or writing of public disorder or resistance to the government". The idea behind sedition is that the government has the right to protect itself against disgruntled citizens. This sounds great on the surface until you remember that, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, and the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Government is a government of, for and by the PEOPLE. The first victim of this law was Matthew Lyons, a member of the Vermont Congress and reporter of a Vermont newspaper. He accused Adams of setting himself in a position of king of the people. Lyons soon found himself imprisoned, as did many other politicians, writers, and anyone else who dared suggest they could govern themselves of speak out against Adams and fellow Federalists. Jefferson labeled the law as the "Alien Friends Act" and persuaded Kentucky and Virginia to pass resolutions against the law. As the people of the New Nation began to see their new-found freedoms slip away at the hands of another King George, they began to rally against Adams, the Federalist and the sedition law. In 1800, Jefferson won election to the presidency by a landslide and Federalists slowly left, apparently in name only.$`jhe citizens now lived in freedom once again, but only for a short period of time. In the 1940's, a group called the American Firsters began to oppose President Roosevelt, the New Deal, the government ties with the Soviet Union, and in particular, going to war with Germany. The FDR administration, with help from a reporter from the Washington Post, entrapped 28 people. Using an alias, the reporter ordered books, pamphlets, etc. and had them sent to Washington D.C.. The 28 defendants were indicted, arrested and taken to Washing D.C. on sedition charges. After four years Chief Justice Laws states, "This is a travesty upon justice, ... case dismissed." Although the government did not win the case, they did succeed in ruining the defendants financially and in scaring anyone else who would oppose the current administration. On Feb. 16, 1988 at Fort Smith, Arkansas, the government again indicted 14 individuals on sedition charges. After 110 witnesses for the state, 1200 pieces of visual evidence, and 8 weeks of trial, all defendants were found innocent. The other tool the federal government uses is "conspiracy to commit RICCO". The only evidence required is for someone to say that they discussed a commission of a crime with another, just like in Orwell novel, "1984". Interesting! Just think, you can be imprisoned for thought crimes. This is not new. It's been developing since the country started. If certain professional politicians had their way, they would control everything. Another example is the media. We're not saying that we support either of these professionals, but look at the difference in standards. During the Louisiana governor's race, established professional politicians, with a lot of help from mass media, succeeded in lambasting David Duke's campaign and yet the same media censored Gary Trudeau's editorial cartoon depicting allegations of Dan Quayle and a DEA file. Nothing obscene or disgusting, but an issue that the people deserve to hear. What happened to unbiased news??? We realize these things are far removed from the issues we deal with on the street, but you have to stop and think. If the federal government tries to make these terror tactics and harassment seem like "the end justifies the means", it hasto make us justify any tactic we may use to make an arrest (or dare I say "A STAT") no matter what rights we may bend or break. Remember, we have the power to protect these rights that were given to us all, even to street cops. Those of you who have had I.S.'s should know best. Citizens deserve no less protection of their rights that what you got, or at least what you should have gotten. - End gl#gma ------------------------------------------------ (This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the Patriot FTP site by S.P.I.R.A.L., the Society for the Protection of Individual Rights and Liberties. E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]) DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
