-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/18/99 4:42:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> No offense Teo, but Dan Evans is a statist imp, and a
> wanna be shyster -- as anyone who ever subscribed to
> misc.taxes well knows -- it's saddening to see you post
> his swill on CTRL.
>
> His Tax Protester FAQ is deceptive in that the
> constitutional issues the FAQ seems to debunk, are
> *not* decided in tax court on constitutional grounds.
> Indeed many of the 'debunked' arguments are
> constitutionally correct, the problem is that (as far
> as tax court goes) constitutional arguments with
> regards to income tax are utterly irrelevant. That's
> why federal judges presiding over income tax cases
> often blurt out something along the lines of, "The
> constitution does not apply in my court!"
>
> Income Tax cases are decided on "Invisible Contracts",
> thus constitutional arguments based on tort are losing
> arguments, not because they are legally incorrect on
> constitutional grounds, but because whenever contract
> law applies, tort arguments are automatically
> overruled.
>
> I've read enough of Dan Evans' usenet posts over the
> years to understand that he *knows* this, and instead
> of "letting the cat out of the bag", and exposing the
> true nature of why these constitutional arguments are
> losing arguments (because of "Invisible Contracts"), he
> deceptively pretends that these constitutional
> arguments lost on *constitutional* grounds, which is
> not the case.
>
> In short, the information in the "300,000$ reward"
> posted by Bob Stokes is *not* bunk, at least with
> regards to tort and constitutional law, although it is
> bunk when "Invisible Contracts" are factored into those
> cases brought forward in tax court -- cases that Dan
> has *deceptively* based his FAQ on. When these
> "Invisible Co
I'm not offended in the least by your comments here. You have all but agreed
with my basic premise, which is amply illustrated by the court cases which
are cited in the FAQ, that is that the LAW and the CONSTITUTION do not matter
a hill of beans if you can't go into court and win the case. Incidentally I
hate taxes and think that they should be abolished, as excessive, and
immoral, etc. However I am not foolish enough to quit paying KNOWING full
well that if I am brought to court I will LOSE and be made to pay, and with
interest and penalties as well. I didn't post his information as an
endorsement per se, but to illustrate a point. BTW, your comments may be
100% factual in your representation of them, BUT the point still is, how can
you gain anything by it, if you will just lose the case in court? It is
virtually impossible to live without being enmeshed in the state machine in
some way, thus even if the overriding factor is "invisible contracts" there
is no way to get around it, or is there?
Thanks for your comments it was my intention to spur discussion!
discussion!
*****************************************************************************************************************
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human
mind to correlate all its contents.
We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of seas of infinity,
and it is not meant that we should
voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have
hitherto harmed us little; but someday
the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying
vistas of reality, and of our
frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation
or flee from the deadly light into the
peace and safety of a new dark age." H.P.Lovecraft; "The Call of Cthulhu"
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
