In a message dated 12/06/1999 11:40:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Monday, December 6, 1999 DIGITAL NATION A Classic Clash of Values in Seattle By Gary Chapman Copyright 1999, The Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved. The protests and riots in Seattle last week during the World Trade Organization summit jolted many Americans. Photo images of black-clad and helmeted police lobbing tear gas at rioters in the center of an American city clashed with the rosy nostrums of economic prosperity endlessly repeated by our political and business leaders. Aren't we all supposed to be celebrating affluence, peace and technology at the end of the millennium? The protesters showed us that not everyone is quite so content. The regrettable violence and vandalism perpetrated by a handful of those in the streets obscured the real issues the peaceful protesters sought to raise. And the news media has in large part been of little help in clarifying what's at stake. Pundits mused over their surprise that any Americans cared about the WTO and its agenda, or had even heard about the world trade body. They shouldn't have been surprised, but most elite opinion-makers in the U.S. don't go to union hall meetings, church basement gatherings or the living room discussions of concerned citizens. A myth rampant in the press is that the WTO's business is about obscure and arcane details of world trade, a boring subject usually reserved for economists, government ministers and academics. But in fact, the protesters are astonishingly sophisticated in their understanding of the most important issues facing the world's population. This sophistication has come, almost miraculously, not from academic research or ivory tower contemplation but from street-level experience and democratic discussions across this country. The "new economy" of digital information technologies is caught up in the controversy surrounding the WTO, obviously. In fact, there is, by now, no other economy than the global system being reshaped by computers and the Internet. That's part of the problem the peaceful protesters were talking about. For partisan advocates of the new digital economy, there is a utopian promise unfolding around the world. The Internet promotes, they say, an unprecedented level playing field that can be exploited by people with intelligence and skill, without regard to economic background, race, religion, ethnicity, geographic location or gender. This leads to a new meritocracy based on individual value and contribution, a historic improvement over previous ways of acquiring status and wealth such as title, birth or inheritance. The efficiencies fostered in the economy by new forms of production, global integration, the "friction free" character of e-commerce and other techniques will lead to cheaper goods, falling prices, a greater distribution of wealth and a corresponding decline in the desperation that has produced wars and other conflicts in the past. This is the optimistic picture painted in a book released a few weeks ago, "The Long Boom," by Peter Schwartz, Peter Leyden and Joel Hyatt (Perseus Books), which argues that the digital economy will escape the boom-and-bust cycles of industrial production. Most important, say the "comp-utopians," the Internet and personal computers free individuals from being simply tools of government, corporations or other large institutions. The Internet fosters freedom of thought and expression, individual confidence in forging personal autonomy, and the economic means to live an individualized life free of coerced conformity. For all these reasons, they say, the information age is the dawn of a new era in human potential. And anyone presenting obstacles to this new potential -- such as trade unions, foot-dragging politicians, Luddites and other doubters -- need to be, and will be, swept away. The comp-utopians, say their critics, are blind to the realities of contemporary economic relations and the true nature of the digital revolution. The critics, including the protesters in Seattle, point out that the "new economy" is demonstrably worsening inequality, threatening to develop a surveillance society, inexorably expanding the power of large corporations and crushing all forms of cultural diversity and authenticity. Instead of the utopia of individual freedom, they say, we're seeing a "Disney-fication" of the world, a radical transformation of the Internet from a medium of communications to something that looks like the worst shopping mall, and a bland, corporate entertainment culture that anesthetizes people into debased, insatiable consumerism. Furthermore, say the critics, the foundational premise of the WTO and other advocates of globalization is unending economic growth and consumption, with the single and unchallengeable model of the United States as the paradigm that should be emulated around the world. This points to environmental suicide. It's unthinkable that the billions of people we expect to greet in the next century should all be encouraged to strive for the American dream of a suburban house, a car and everything that Wal-Mart or Sears sells. Under that model, the human race would devour the Earth very rapidly, as we seem to be doing already. The prospect that every person on Earth should be turned into a clone of the average American middle-class consumer is terrifying and abhorrent to many people who treasure the diversity of human culture, which is rapidly eroding. When the promises of abundance and the easy consumer life are combined with the realities of environmental constraints and deepening income inequality, the critics say, we are setting ourselves up for huge future conflicts, not sustainable world peace. One op-ed columnist began a piece last week with the question and answer: "Is there anything more ridiculous in the news today than the protests against the World Trade Organization in Seattle? I doubt it." The question should have been, "Is there anything more serious in the news today than the protests against the World Trade Organization in Seattle?" I doubt it. What happened in Seattle was the most important confrontation of values we've seen in a long time, and one that will last well into the next millennium. Gary Chapman is director of the 21st Century Project at the University of Texas at Austin. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>
Friends, Below is my Los Angeles Times column for today, Monday, December 6, 1999. As always, please feel free to pass this on, but please retain the copyright notice. Carol and I had a wonderful holiday in New York City, where we spent a week doing nothing but touristy things and getting an annual cultural fix -- seeing plays, going to concerts, movies, museums, visiting the Christmas lights at the Bronx Zoo, etc. New York is dazzling these days. We had a memorable Thanksgiving dinner at the breathtaking Brooklyn Heights apartment of Internet pioneer Wes Clark and his wife Maxine Rockoff, sharing a sumptuous dinner with their family and friends while overlooking the Manhattan skyline and the Statue of Liberty. (I made a mistake in my last note about Wes' history -- he wasn't at BB&N, as I mistakenly reported, but at Lincoln Lab in the early days of the ARPAnet.) Wes is currently working with Ivan Sutherland for Sun Microsystems' research lab, and they're not surprisingly doing some very far-reaching, cutting-edge research. It's interesting that with all the hype about how the "new economy" is a young person's domain, these senior computer scientists are still pushing the boundaries of the field. I've been proud and honored to be part of this year's selection process for the winner of the ACM's Turing Award -- you should be hearing about the results of that process in the news very soon. We had several outstanding candidates but we picked the right person, I feel. Carol and I send our best to everyone for a wonderful and happy holiday season, the last of the 20th century! Best, -- Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------ If you have received this from me, Gary Chapman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), you are subscribed to the listserv that sends out copies of my column in The Los Angeles Times and other published articles. If you wish to UNSUBSCRIBE from this listserv, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], leave the subject line blank, and put "Unsubscribe Chapman" in the first line of the message. If you received this message from a source other than me and would like to subscribe to the listserv, the instructions for subscribing are at the end of the message. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE -- the listserv is set up to reject replies to the sending address. You must use the command address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to either subscribe or unsubscribe, or use the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send back comments. ------------------------------------------ Monday, December 6, 1999 DIGITAL NATION A Classic Clash of Values in Seattle By Gary Chapman Copyright 1999, The Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved. The protests and riots in Seattle last week during the World Trade Organization summit jolted many Americans. Photo images of black-clad and helmeted police lobbing tear gas at rioters in the center of an American city clashed with the rosy nostrums of economic prosperity endlessly repeated by our political and business leaders. Aren't we all supposed to be celebrating affluence, peace and technology at the end of the millennium? The protesters showed us that not everyone is quite so content. The regrettable violence and vandalism perpetrated by a handful of those in the streets obscured the real issues the peaceful protesters sought to raise. And the news media has in large part been of little help in clarifying what's at stake. Pundits mused over their surprise that any Americans cared about the WTO and its agenda, or had even heard about the world trade body. They shouldn't have been surprised, but most elite opinion-makers in the U.S. don't go to union hall meetings, church basement gatherings or the living room discussions of concerned citizens. A myth rampant in the press is that the WTO's business is about obscure and arcane details of world trade, a boring subject usually reserved for economists, government ministers and academics. But in fact, the protesters are astonishingly sophisticated in their understanding of the most important issues facing the world's population. This sophistication has come, almost miraculously, not from academic research or ivory tower contemplation but from street-level experience and democratic discussions across this country. The "new economy" of digital information technologies is caught up in the controversy surrounding the WTO, obviously. In fact, there is, by now, no other economy than the global system being reshaped by computers and the Internet. That's part of the problem the peaceful protesters were talking about. For partisan advocates of the new digital economy, there is a utopian promise unfolding around the world. The Internet promotes, they say, an unprecedented level playing field that can be exploited by people with intelligence and skill, without regard to economic background, race, religion, ethnicity, geographic location or gender. This leads to a new meritocracy based on individual value and contribution, a historic improvement over previous ways of acquiring status and wealth such as title, birth or inheritance. The efficiencies fostered in the economy by new forms of production, global integration, the "friction free" character of e-commerce and other techniques will lead to cheaper goods, falling prices, a greater distribution of wealth and a corresponding decline in the desperation that has produced wars and other conflicts in the past. This is the optimistic picture painted in a book released a few weeks ago, "The Long Boom," by Peter Schwartz, Peter Leyden and Joel Hyatt (Perseus Books), which argues that the digital economy will escape the boom-and-bust cycles of industrial production. Most important, say the "comp-utopians," the Internet and personal computers free individuals from being simply tools of government, corporations or other large institutions. The Internet fosters freedom of thought and expression, individual confidence in forging personal autonomy, and the economic means to live an individualized life free of coerced conformity. For all these reasons, they say, the information age is the dawn of a new era in human potential. And anyone presenting obstacles to this new potential -- such as trade unions, foot-dragging politicians, Luddites and other doubters -- need to be, and will be, swept away. The comp-utopians, say their critics, are blind to the realities of contemporary economic relations and the true nature of the digital revolution. The critics, including the protesters in Seattle, point out that the "new economy" is demonstrably worsening inequality, threatening to develop a surveillance society, inexorably expanding the power of large corporations and crushing all forms of cultural diversity and authenticity. Instead of the utopia of individual freedom, they say, we're seeing a "Disney-fication" of the world, a radical transformation of the Internet from a medium of communications to something that looks like the worst shopping mall, and a bland, corporate entertainment culture that anesthetizes people into debased, insatiable consumerism. Furthermore, say the critics, the foundational premise of the WTO and other advocates of globalization is unending economic growth and consumption, with the single and unchallengeable model of the United States as the paradigm that should be emulated around the world. This points to environmental suicide. It's unthinkable that the billions of people we expect to greet in the next century should all be encouraged to strive for the American dream of a suburban house, a car and everything that Wal-Mart or Sears sells. Under that model, the human race would devour the Earth very rapidly, as we seem to be doing already. The prospect that every person on Earth should be turned into a clone of the average American middle-class consumer is terrifying and abhorrent to many people who treasure the diversity of human culture, which is rapidly eroding. When the promises of abundance and the easy consumer life are combined with the realities of environmental constraints and deepening income inequality, the critics say, we are setting ourselves up for huge future conflicts, not sustainable world peace. One op-ed columnist began a piece last week with the question and answer: "Is there anything more ridiculous in the news today than the protests against the World Trade Organization in Seattle? I doubt it." The question should have been, "Is there anything more serious in the news today than the protests against the World Trade Organization in Seattle?" I doubt it. What happened in Seattle was the most important confrontation of values we've seen in a long time, and one that will last well into the next millennium. Gary Chapman is director of the 21st Century Project at the University of Texas at Austin. He can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------ To subscribe to a listserv that forwards copies of Gary Chapman's published articles, including his column "Digital Nation" in The Los Angeles Times, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Leave the subject line blank. In the first line of the message, put: Subscribe Chapman [First name] [Last name] Leave out the brackets, just put your name after Chapman. Send this message. You'll get a confirmation message back confirming your subscription. This message will contain some boilerplate text, generated by the listserv software, about passwords, which you should IGNORE. Passwords will not be used or required for this listserv. Mail volume on this listserv is low; expect to get something two or three times a month. The list will be used only for forwarding published versions of Gary Chapman's articles, or else pointers to URLs for online versions of his articles -- nothing else will be sent to the list. To unsubscribe from the listserv, follow the same instructions above, except substitute the word "Unsubscribe" for "Subscribe." Please feel free to pass along copies of the forwarded articles, but please retain the relevant copyright information. Also feel free to pass along these instructions for subscribing to the listserv, to anyone who might be interested in such material. Questions should be directed to Gary Chapman at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
