|
-----Original Message-----
From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; The Press Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 5:37 PM Subject: [Robot-for-President] Humanoid Capabilities: An Unsolved Mystery. Dear Waseda University:
I note from your web site <http://www.humanoid.rise.waseda.ac.jp/>
that your goal is "to develop an anthropomorphic robot named 'Humanoid'
which will comprise sensing, recognition, expression and motion sub-systems to
enable robots and humans to build common mental and physical spaces,
co-operatively." I also note that you invite questions and comments. The
Honda Humanoid <http://www.honda.co.jp/english/technology/robot/index.html>
has a similar objective as according to educational television some $100 m. has
been spent to date on P1, P2 and P3. We are also informed that 'Humanoid' is
Japanese national science policy. Therefore I am wondering when we will see a
practical, affordable, general purpose home and office personal robot on the
consumer market? NEC <http://www.nec.jp/english/today/newsrel/9908/3101.html>
has the prototype for a "friendly, walkin', talkin' people partner personal
robot" to quote the press release. The NEC R100 personal robot would
expectedly sell in the pc range. According to the web site it is a
"button-less interface for people to a variety of electronic
appliances." Also see <http://www.incx.nec.co.jp/robot>.
The R100 has voice recognition sufficient to carry out a number of tasks on
command, including Internet use.
As a consumer I would be willing to pay in the
automobile price range, not the pc range, for a pr.
Therefore I would like to ask some questions about current
technological capabilities for pr's. In conjunction with <http://www.vcn.bc.ca/culturex/Machine-Psychology.htm>
I am designing an educational television script and I would appreciate it if a
spokesperson from Waseda University could answer the following two questions
about your knowledge on the recognition and motion sub-systems to which you
refer on your web site?
(1) RECOGNITION SUB-SYSTEM: Given that the robot visual
modality can recognize faces, <http://www.faceit.com> , can it recognize a
carrot in my refrigerator? Is there any kitchen object(s) it would have
difficulty recognizing? If so, which object(s)? Why would it have this
difficulty?
(2) MOTION SUB-SYSTEM: If the personal robot can recognize a
carrot, can it peel the carrot with a standard vegetable peeler? Is there any
motion entailed in preparing a meal which a personal robot could not execute? If
so, which motion(s)?
Finally we should ask if Martha Stewart and
her ilk have anything to worry about? Martha Stewart is one of the multitudinous
and boring television kitchen "personalities" (and the word
"personalities" is deliberately in quotes) who regale us with their
ability to pass high school home economics 10. Some become quite rich with this
dreary litany and we were recently told that Martha's net worth is $ one
billion. (Maybe she will catch up to Bill Gates whose contribution to society is
only slightly greater). Given this as backgrounder just think of the revenues a
Waseda Humanoid with a REAL PERSONALITY and a TV Cooking Show could bring
into your university!
Sincerely-FWP.
|
