-Caveat Lector-

from;
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin
Grabbe</A>
-----
Central Banking


Funny Money Ain't No Joke


Don't use your currency. Use ours.

Rudi Dornbusch says small economies should forget monetary independence and
throw in their lot with an established currency.

When new nations are born, the first thing they do is create a new currency.
Whether it is called the peso or the hrvnya, it is bound to be pathetic. Few
of these currencies rise to distinction; more likely, the number of zeros
will increase steadily as ever more patriotic images are printed on the back
of the bill to make up for the declining purchasing power. Such is the price
of misconceived national identity.

Even if it is the steady inflation of 60 to 100 per cent that Turkey has been
living with, or the single digit inflation of some better behaved transition
economies, the basic question remains: why do emerging economies insist on
managing their own central banks?

Democratic money is bad money. The past decade has witnessed the rise of
strong and independent central banks and the outsourcing of money. Countries
such as Italy have narrowly escaped public sector bankruptcy by surrendering
their monetary authority to the European Central Bank. In France, where the
situation was somewhat less precarious, the surrender first to the Bundesbank
and then the ECB has been no less unconditional and clearly for the better.

There is a message here for Europe's peripheral nations. National dilettante
management of currencies is too expensive, particularly for poor countries
aspiring to international respect and prosperity.

The present hype in capital markets suggests two unusual ways of putting a
bright new face on a bad currency. The first strategy is a friendly takeover.
The obvious candidate for such a move is the International Monetary Fund, but
that could be too low key. To maximise value, perhaps a better strategy would
be to focus on the owners of designer labels. Could LVMH, which already owns
Krug champagne and Louis Vuitton, be persuaded to add a Ukrainian brand, the
hrvnya, to its stable?

An alternative asset market strategy builds on the suggestion of Larry
Summers, the US Treasury secretary, who noted that just about anything that
is called dot-com can boom without much effort. Why not, he asked, lift
depressed currencies by dot-coming them? Would this strategy work for, say,
Turkey as the country struggles to end its double-digit inflation and fiscal
turmoil?

But there are risks with the dot-com ploy. High valuation is good but
overvaluation brings new risks. Moreover, if dot-com assets crash, as many
surely will, this would spell an early death for the country's stabilisation
plan. Better to pursue the Italian strategy of using dot-euro.

Just how would this work? It takes the practical form of a currency board -
the central bank no longer issues money except in the context of purchasing
foreign exchange, and the exchange rate is rigidly and forever pegged to the
euro. Interest rates collapse, inflation stops dead in its tracks, the limits
of tolerance for mismanagement become very tight and politics is taken out of
public finance. Soon, as in Greece today, the discussion is about the finer
details of convergence rather than the vulgar possibility of public
bankruptcy. Needless to say, the local stock market will boom, growth will
pick up sharply and the finance minister will make the front covers of
People, W and Euromoney. The president will get two full terms in office.

Crummy monies are out of fashion, cool money is in. No one believes
devaluation is a step towards prosperity or that inflation creates jobs;
nobody can possibly believe that printing money is a particularly intelligent
way to finance government. Europe's peripheral countries want to join the
European Union for trade integration so they can sell their vegetables,
oranges and textiles. But currency stability is more important for
prosperity. There is only one way to get it: unconditional surrender, close
the central bank, give up funny money.

Opposition to this modest proposal comes from many quarters - not least from
central bankers. Giving up a currency means a threat to perks and privileges.
Even if the central bank is kept alive, prestige will be brutally eroded.
(Just look at the demoralised provincial bank the Buba is today.) The
financial sector is opposed because hard money means an end to living off
inflation-distorted capital markets.

The future is not on their side. Europe is about to do away with the last
vestige of bad money as francs and lira and the whole obscene reminder of
political money are replaced by crisp, fresh and bright single-digit euros.

It makes it that much harder to make sense of an obscure central or southern
European currency, whatever its name. How can you have faith in something
called a Turkish lira - the very name lira is bad, and Turkey does not make
it better. All the more true of the Ukrainian hrvnya. Even if nothing else
works in a country, at least good money might be a change for the better.

The author is Ford Professor of Economics and International Management at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The Financial Times, Jan. 3, 2000


Privacy


Naked in the Airport


Fly the friendly skies.

AN X-ray scanner that shows airport customs officers the naked bodies of
passengers has been greeted with outrage by American civil liberties
watchdogs.

The BodySearch machine has been in place in New York and five other American
cities for several months. Security officers can look at pictures of the
human body in outline regardless of how much clothing passengers are wearing.

According to a spokesman for the manufacturers, the images of the body are
not clear, although genitals and breasts are clearly distinguishable. "It is
not like you are getting a photograph of a naked person," the spokesman said.

Anyone seeking to smuggle drugs or weapons was most likely to hide them in
areas untouched by body searches, such as the groin and, in women, the chest.
Raymond Kelley, commissioner for the Customs service, said the machine was
introduced in response to passengers' concerns about intimate searches.

"People object to being physically touched and in response to that we brought
in the scanners," Mr Kelley said. The Customs service is facing several
lawsuits, mainly from women and members of ethnic minorities, claiming
discrimination in singling out passengers for body searches.

The American Civil Liberties Union said it was considering legal action to
prohibit use of the X-ray machine. "If there is ever a place where a person
has a reasonable expectation of privacy, it is under their clothing," Gregory
Nojeim, an ACLU lawyer, said yesterday.

The Customs service has refused to say where and how the machines are being
used, but confirmed that it was planned to install them at all international
airports in America by next June. The machines are expected to scan only
passengers selected by Customs officers for special attention.
The London Telegraph, Jan. 3, 2000
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to