-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

20 March 2000
Source: US national newspaper.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

March 20, 2000

U.S. Plans for Mock Terrorist Attacks Get Mixed Response From Top Officials
BY DAVID S. CLOUD

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. is spending millions of dollars to stage several mock
terrorist attacks in late May to test the preparedness of top government
officials. Unfortunately, most of them probably won't be paying much
attention.

The Justice Department will stage at least three and as many as six
rapid-fire mock attacks at a cost of between $3.5 million and $6 million. The
exercise is designed to test how the government would respond if a foreign
terrorist group released biological agents, chemical weapons and radiation,
and hacked into computer networks, in three locales: Denver, Portsmouth,
N.H., and outside Washington, D.C.

The idea behind the exercise was to test whether top officials were ready to
respond if terrorists struck. But so far, the only top officials who have
agreed to participate in the 10-day role-playing exercise are Attorney
General Janet Reno and Federal Emergency Management Director James Lee Witt.

Some top officials who would be involved in any real attacks are saying
privately that this one, dubbed Topoff for top officials, bears little
relation to reality. Letters went out several months ago asking the cabinet
officials to participate, but none has given a firm commitment, according to
people involved.

Aides Likely to Attend

As the date of the exercise approaches, "we have a few commitments, and we're
looking to get more," says Ted Macklin, the director of exercises at the
Justice Department Office of State and Local Domestic Preparedness. Health
and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala is expected to participate, he
added. Other cabinet secretaries are expected to designate aides to attend.

Planners would like to convene a meeting during the exercise of the so-called
principals committee, which includes national security adviser Samuel "Sandy"
Berger, Defense Secretary William Cohen and Army Gen. Henry Shelton, chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. But National Security Council aides aren't
being too encouraging. "It's unrealistic to expect that someone who has a
major department to run will sit in a room for days doing something like
this," says a person involved in the planning.

Details of the exercise are being kept quiet, since it is supposed to
surprise those involved. But people knowledgeable about the planning say it
will be the largest test ever devised of the government's ability to respond
to potential terrorist attacks.

Police and rescue units will be deployed. Streets will be blocked off and
hundreds of volunteer "victims" will be transported to hospitals. Federal
counterterrorism units from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the
Pentagon will be activated and flown in to enhance the realism.

Critics Cite Potential Problems

Critics in the government say the sheer scale of the exercise is the problem.
It's highly unlikely that three or more terrorist attacks would occur at
about the same time, they maintain, while the costs of the exercises would
stretch existing resources.

All of this is unfolding because of a provision inserted in an appropriations
bill two years ago by Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, directing
the administration to "practice operations" in the event of a terrorist
attack, including "all key personnel" who would take part if such an attack
occurred.

Administration officials note that cabinet members and other top officials
gathered at the White House in 1998 for a day-long planning session on how to
respond to a major terrorist attack.

Mr. Gregg specified that the exercise should be handled by contractors "with
a known track record" in staging such events. The Justice Department hired
two consulting firms stocked with former government officials and military
officers who worked in counterterrorism: Science Applications International
Corp. and Research Planning Inc.

It has taken more than a year and the involvement of hundreds of state and
local officials to plan the exercise. Few were surprised, however, when
planners chose Portsmouth, in Mr. Gregg's home state, as the location for for
one of the mock attacks.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to