---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 08:53:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Look at Ancient Betrayer
He is the exemplar of treachery, the shadow defined by
Light. To this day his name--Judas Iscariot--remains a synonym
for betrayal.
But what if the traditional understanding of Judas is
actually a distortion? What if he is actually a victim of a sort
of theological libel--a 1st century bad press--that helped create
two millenniums of Christian anti-Semitism?
As Christians observe Good Friday, New Testament scholars
are reexamining Judas' role in the fateful events that led to
Jesus' crucifixion. The scholarship is part of a broader
movement to find the historical nuggets that underlie Christian
Scripture. Some of the scholars suggest that Judas may be the
most misunderstood villain in history.
Of course, you don't have to be a New Testament scholar--or
even a Christian--to be fascinated by a character like Judas.
The traditional story is set out in the sometimes changing
accounts of the Gospels: Judas, one of Jesus' disciples,
conspired with the chief priests of the Temple to have Jesus
arrested for blasphemy. In exchange for 30 pieces of silver he
led Jesus' captors to a secret location in the Garden of
Gethsemane. There, in the dark of night, as a sign to the police,
he betrayed his Lord with a kiss.
In modern popular culture, the 1971 rock musical "Jesus
Christ Superstar" is told through the eyes of Judas, portrayed as
a disillusioned disciple who betrays Jesus to save the movement.
The 1988 motion picture "The Last Temptation of Christ" offers a
revisionist view of Judas. In the movie, Judas agrees to an act
of betrayal only after Jesus insists he must die on the cross. In
the 1950s, when Nikos Kazantzakis wrote the book on which the
movie was based, its notion of Jesus and Judas in league together
was so shocking that the author was excommunicated by the Greek
Orthodox Church.
And for centuries, the story of a disciple gone monstrously
wrong has remained a cautionary tale for Christians. The implicit
question: Might they too be capable of betrayal?
But beneath those metaphors and traditions, is there a
historical truth?
The traditional Christian account of Judas is put together
from bits and pieces of the New Testament. Judas is not mentioned
in the earliest Christian writings--the letters known as
epistles, many written by the Apostle Paul between AD 40 and 60.
In the Gospels, which were written later, Judas' character
becomes increasingly prominent and sinister. The Gospel of Mark,
which scholars believe was finished around AD 70, devotes 169
words to Judas. By comparison, the Gospel of John, probably
written at the end of the 1st century, devotes 489 words to Judas
and portrays him as a full-blown villain who betrayed his Lord
for money--the traditional 30 pieces of silver.
Scholars see that progression within the Scriptural accounts
as significant. The Gospels, they note, were written at a time
when the early church--still a Jewish sect, not yet a separate
religion--was riven by internal arguments.
Believers in Jesus as the Messiah differed sharply among
themselves on points of their emerging Christian doctrine. At the
same time, they engaged in sharp, sometimes bitterly angry,
polemics with leading figures of what eventually became Rabbinic
Judaism.
As Christianity and Judaism diverged in those early
centuries, those arguments eventually led many of the early
Christians to adopt a sharply anti-Jewish tone. That tone
deepened further as the new Church reached out more and more to
Gentile converts.
The story of Judas as a villain, some scholars suggest,
played into the need to differentiate Christian from Jew.
Indeed, by the end of the 4th century, St. Augustine, the
most influential of the early Christian theologians, was teaching
that St. Peter was the biblical exemplar for the church, while
Judas, the betrayer, represented the Jews.
The Judas story "was exploited as anti-Jewish polemic in
dramatic literature and art, depicting Judas with grossly
exaggerated Semitic features and generalizing his love for
money," wrote the late Roman Catholic scholar Raymond Brown,
whose two-volume study, "The Death of the Messiah," is considered
to be among the most authoritative published.
Of course, that was then. Since the Second Vatican Council
in the mid-1960s, the Roman Catholic Church has declared that
Jews are not responsible as a people for Jesus' death and are
"most dear to God." Anti-Semitism is forbidden by the Catholic
church's teachings and catechism. Other Christian churches have
also made declarations against anti-Semitic interpretations of
the Bible.
And some of the scholars now reinterpreting Judas' story say
openly that their efforts are driven, at least in part, by a
desire to fully rid the churches of anti-Semitic vestiges.
One of the most outspoken is William Klassen, a research
professor at L'Ecole Biblique in Jerusalem.
"Jesus never chose a traitor. He chose a man whom he could
depend on to do his thing. There's no betrayal involved," Klassen
argues.
The key for Klassen is a single Greek word--paradidomi.
Traditionally, that word has been translated as "betray."
But Klassen, along with other scholars, argues it actually should
be translated "to hand over."
The distinction may seem to be splitting theological hairs,
but Biblical scholars insist it is weighty. One translation makes
Judas a traitor. The other could make him an agent of divine
will.
In a key biblical passage from the Epistle to the
Corinthians (1 Corinthians 11:23-24)--a passage from which the
Christian Eucharistic service takes its words--Paul used the word
paradidomi. The traditional translation is ". . . the Lord Jesus
on the night when he was betrayed took a loaf of bread, and when
he had given thanks, he broke it and said, 'This is my body that
is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.' "
Paul's account does not say who betrayed Jesus. Nor does it
give any hint why anyone would do so. But once the idea of
betrayal was raised, later Gospel writers filled in the
blanks--Jesus, they said, was betrayed by Judas for the money.
The alternative theory is that Paul's use of the word did
not mean that Jesus was "betrayed" at all, but only that he was
"arrested" or "handed over."
However it is translated, many scholars say that Paul had a
higher purpose in mind in his letter--to link Jesus with the
"suffering servant" mentioned in the prophecy of Isaiah who was
despised and rejected by others and gave up his life for his
friends. The emphasis was on God's action. The human agent's role
was incidental.
The idea that paradidomi may not mean betrayal is also
conditionally supported in a new third edition of the
authoritative Bauer's Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
and other Early Christian Literature, to be published in June.
In it, editor Frederick William Danker writes that the word
paradidomi, as used in the New Testament, can have a far more
benign meaning than "betray."
"It is not certain that when Paul refers to 'handing over,'
'delivering up,' 'arresting' he is even thinking of the action
taken against Jesus by Judas, much less interpreting it as
betrayal," Danker wrote in his commentary.
Danker, who is an authority on Greco-Roman literature,
papyri and epigraphs, said in an interview that "when this hits
the fan there'll be a lot of discussion about some of my
departures from traditional wording."
Klassen goes further in his 1996 book, "Judas: Betrayer or
Friend of Jesus?"
Gleaning the meanings of the earliest accounts, he argues
that Jesus and Judas together arranged Jesus' arrest as a means
of presenting him to the chief priests and elders to make the
case that he was the Messiah.
"I maintain the evidence is that Judas had some preliminary
discussion with the temple authorities. [But] the decision to go
to them, telling them where Jesus was to be found, was not made
until after the Last Supper," Klassen said. "Judas hoped that
Jesus would have a chance to establish his credentials before the
high priests."
No one was more surprised than Judas when Jesus was turned
over to the Romans after a night of questioning, Klassen
hypothesizes.
Further, Klassen said, Judas may have hanged himself, not
out of guilt, but out of a tradition of a soldier's dying with
his king. Klassen points to an intriguing painting, done between
AD 350 and AD 370, that hangs in the British Museum and may
preserve an alternative tradition edged out by what is now the
Gospel account.
The painting depicts Jesus on the cross and Judas next to
him hanging from a tree. Aside from the fact that Jesus and Judas
are pictured together, what fascinates Klassen is a nest of birds
in the hanging tree. The mother bird is feeding her young.
"In ancient art, that is always a sign of hope," he said.
Most scholars, including Danker, take issue with Klassen's
theme of friendship to the bitter end. Klassen's book is loaded
"with a lot of perhaps and possibilities," Danker says.
But many agree that, if not a good guy, Judas was probably a
man of far more complexity and mixed motives than the Gospel
accounts suggest.
"Probably it was a complex human story. Most human beings
have very mixed motives, and to see Judas only as a terrible
person with very bad motives is probably a mistake," said Los
Angeles Episcopal Bishop Frederick H. Borsch, a New Testament
scholar and the author of books on Jesus.
For all the scholarship, however, Judas' dark reputation
appears to have been sealed by theology and tradition.
In Dante's Inferno, Judas is relegated to the lowest pits of
hell, where he is eaten, head first, by a three-headed demon with
flapping bat-like wings. In the popular imagination, that may be
where he remains.
"The story is so firmly entrenched that I don't think it's
going to change. He's the person who got Jesus into that fix,"
Borsch said.
"If you want to know who was responsible, in some real
sense, of course, God was. . . . Just as we say that God was
present with Jesus, and God was in Jesus taking the
responsibility, in some sense God is responsible for Judas, too.
I think, finally, we have to trust Judas to God."
http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20000421/t000037680.html
###
P.S. If you are interested in a FREE high-speed DSL internet
service provider, and/or a FREE $200 DSL modem, then register AND
DOWNLOAD THE SOFTWARE (i.e., registration alone WON'T GET IT
DONE) at:
http://i.winfire.com/s/isapiEng.dll/wf.exe?cmd=rl&508,120031685&wf.exe
OH, and you've only got till the 30th of this month to get it
done.
=================================================================
Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT
FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
