>
>UFOs game the French fighter jets, and that is an ET
>craft, by the rules of best evidence.
Which rules of evidence, exactly, are you refering to here? Be specific.
Who wrote them? When? Where may I look them up? Cite your source. What's
the ISBN? On which page are these rules found? What, exactly, do they say?
>
>THAT IS THE CORE OF THE REPORT, NESSIE.
>THE FRENCH ARE REPORTING ON 500 UFO CRAFT THAT BY THE RULES OF BEST
>EVIDENCE
>ARE EXTRATERRESTRIAL.
A report is a report. If I report to you that the French were actually
seeing my kid's model planes, does that mean that's what the French saw?
Of course not. A report is a report, nothing more. It's not proof. Show us
some proof, REAL, proof.
>
>
>UFOs gamed my radio talk show in Jackson MISS on May
>14, 2000 -
Tell us about it.
>
>coulda been ETs. Coulda been USA military mimics.
Now that's an objective analysis. That's exactly what I've been saying all
along.
>
>I think it was
>ETs.
That is a wholly credible statement. I believe you when you say this. That
alone doesn't mean that I'm right, but I'll give you the benefit of the
doubt.
>
>UFOs game with people who are ET sensitive.
What exactly does that mean? Are you saying that some people can percieve
UFOs and some can't?
>
> ETs are playing a
>"peripheral cuing" game. UFO encounters are peripheral cues, mass
>psychology
>enhancers. Pentagon secret triangular UFOs are gross. ET UFOs are cool.
>ETs
>don't play YOUR game; ETs play THEIR game Capiche?
How do you know this? Did the tell you personally or did you figure it
out? and what exactly, is a "peripheral cuing game"?
><<T hey also have not come up with a single ET, just a lot of talk.>>
>
>
>Nessie - That is false.
So where is he then? Where is the ET? Take me to him. I'll buy the little
sucker a drink and we'll talk it over, him and me. Then I'll come right
back here and tell y'all he's real. That's a promise.
In the meantime, he's a character in a story some people tell, no more, no
less, and that's the way it is. It doesn't mean the story's not true. But
it sure as hell don't mean that it is.
>
BTW, that Italian word you tried to use is spelled: capiesc'
Really; look it up.
>
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om