>From http://www.reason.com/sullum/060700.html

>>Now, we need to remember is Kerouac and Burroughs and Castenada and the other
literati who have devoted significant numbers of words to experiences
"pertaining to, in whole or in part, the manufacture or use of a controlled
substance".  A<>E<>R <<

}}>Begin
Knowledge Control
By Jacob Sullum
        "Doing heroin isn�t as scandalous as writing about it," observes Ann Marlowe
in her memoir Stopping Time: Heroin From A to Z. Marlowe is recalling the angry
letters she received from readers who worried that an article she had written
might encourage people to use heroin.
        However scandalous it may be, writing about heroin, unlike using it, is not
illegal. But a bill known as the Methamphetamine Anti-Proliferation Act could
change that.
        MAPA, which was unanimously approved by the Senate in November, is being
considered by the House Judiciary Committee. Among other things, the House
version would make it a federal offense, punishable by up to 10 years in
prison,
"to distribute by any means information pertaining to, in whole or in part, the
manufacture or use of a controlled substance" if one intends or knows that the
information will "be used for, or in furtherance of, an activity that
constitutes a Federal crime."
        The intent or knowledge requirement might let someone like Marlowe off the
hook. Likewise, a big bookseller such as Amazon could argue that it offers
guides for growing pot and synthesizing psychedelics not to encourage those
activities but simply to satisfy its customers� curiosity.
        Loompanics Unlimited, which specializes in fringe titles like Secrets of
Methamphetamine Manufacture and Opium for the Masses, would have a harder time
mounting that defense. So would the authors of such books.
        MAPA presumably would put an end to magazines like High Times, which
celebrates marijuana culture, publishes growing tips, advertises drug
paraphernalia, and, not incidentally, assails the war on drugs. Web sites that
discuss the medical benefits of marijuana or offer advice for reducing the
risks of drug use (say, by sterilizing needles or using vaporizers) would also
be in trouble, especially if they link to sites that sell drug-related items.
Such links are themselves forbidden by the bill.
        No one can say for sure how the law would be applied--who would be prosecuted
and who would be able to offer a successful defense. But that is precisely the
point: By its very existence, such a law would discourage controversial speech
about drugs.
        The response to such criticism from MAPA�s House sponsor, Rep. Chris Cannon (R-
Utah), is either dense or disingenuous. "We don�t want to beat on anyone�s
rights to things like free speech, but we do want to make it clear that illicit
drugs are a scourge to society," Cannon�s legislative director recently told
the Cleveland Plain Dealer. "Recipes for a drug as dangerous as methamphetamine
shouldn�t be available to everyone to produce in their garage or basement."
        Got that? Cannon doesn�t want to abridge freedom of speech; he just wants to
censor dangerous information.
         It�s disturbing that a piece of legislation like this one could sail through
the Senate without a peep about the First Amendment. But it�s not surprising
that drug control has evolved into knowledge control.
        After all, "a drug-free America," a goal repeatedly endorsed by Congress, is a
totalitarian fantasy. Those who seek to achieve it are naturally driven to
totalitarian means.
        Censorship is not the only threat. Another MAPA provision authorizes "sneak
and peek" searches of people�s homes. Federal agents could execute a search
without notice and make copies of papers or computer files without furnishing a
list of what they took.
        Meanwhile, a combination of government mandates and corporate eagerness to
enlist in the war on drugs has made our very bodies increasingly subject to
searches aimed at determining if we have violated any pharmacological taboos.
Glancing at a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed piece in which criminologist
James Q. Wilson said we ought to "reduce [drug] demand through mandatory
testing," I thought for a moment that he meant every American should be forced
to urinate into a cup.
        It turned out that Wilson was talking about expanding the use of drug testing
in the criminal justice system, something Al Gore endorsed last month. Under
Gore�s plan, The New York Times reported, "inmates in state prisons...would not
be released until they could pass drug tests."
        Notice what this proposal concedes: Even in the regimented conditions of
prison, drug use persists. Following the drug warriors� vision of regulated
reading material and unannounced searches won�t stop people from using
politically incorrect chemicals to alter their consciousness. But it will make
our society more like a prison.
� Copyright 2000 by Creators Syndicate Inc.

End<{{

>>Is Chris Cannon in favour of the junk food tax? A<>E<>R <<

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to