------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:                   "Alamaine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent:              Tue, 13 Jun 2000 11:09:07 -0500
Subject:                Solon:  The REAL Commandments
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Priority:               normal

>>Now, Mr. O'R, patrolman for the "Truth Police" I realise that your being an
independent has some measure of respectful scepticism, at least evident in your
challenges to "conventional, accepted" 'truth', most notably -- and recently by
Hillary's Yankee fan parody (apropo to her parody of being a candidate for New
York) -- by the Clinton Administration.  And, verily I say unto you, I have
listened to your postured positioning postulations, one remarkably asserting
the
American form of government was based on 'Judeo-Xtian' tenets.  Yet, in view of
no -- NO -- reference to any specific named religion (all believe in something
of a "Creator" and "Nature's God" is as well somewhat all- encompassing), your
words and thoughts continue to pound on an untuned hollow. As I crooze the
'Net,
I find things and the following that should help you flesh out your position on
the genesis of American government.  This should help you tune the skins on
your
drums.  A<>E<>R (Red River of the North) <<


>From
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/features/2000/carrier2.html

}}>Begin
The Real Ten Commandments
By Richard Carrier
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/

I keep hearing this chant, variously phrased: "The Ten Commandments are the
foundation of Western morality and the American Constitution and government."
In
saying this, people are essentially crediting Moses with the invention of
ethics, democracy and civil rights, a claim that is of course absurd. But its
absurdity is eclipsed by its injustice, for there is another lawmaker who is
far
more important to us, whose ideas and actions lie far more at the foundation of
American government, and whose own Ten Commandments were distributed at large
and influencing the greatest civilizations of the West-- Greece and Rome--for
well over half a millennia before the laws of Moses were anything near a
universal social influence. In fact, by the time the Ten Commandments of Moses
had any real chance of being the foundation of anything in Western society,
democracy and civil rights had all but died out, never to rise again until the
ideals of our true hero, the real man to whom we owe all reverence, were
rediscovered and implemented in what we now call "modern democratic principles."

The man I am talking about is Solon the Athenian. Solon was born, we believe,
around 638 B.C.E., and lived until approximately 558, but the date in his life
of greatest importance to us is the year he was elected to create a constitution
for Athens, 594 B.C.E. How important is this man? Let's examine what we owe to
him, in comparison with the legendary author (or at last, in legend, the
transmitter) of the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments. Solon is the founder of
Western democracy and the first man in history to articulate ideas of equal
rights for all citizens, and though he did not go nearly as far in the latter as
we have come today, Moses can claim no connection to either. Solon was the first
man in Western history to publicly record a civil constitution in writing. No
one in Hebrew history did anything of the kind, least of all Moses. Solon
advocated not only the right but even the duty of every citizen to bear arms in
the defense of the state--to him we owe the 2nd Amendment. Nothing about that is
to be found in the Ten Commandments of Moses. Solon set up laws defending the
principles and importance of private property, state encouragement of economic
trades and crafts, and a strong middle class--the ideals which lie at the heart
of American prosperity, yet which cannot be credited at all to Moses.

Solon is the first man in history to eliminate birth as a basis for government
office, and to create democratic assemblies open to all male citizens, such that
no law could be passed without the majority vote of all. The notion of letting
women into full political rights would not arise in any culture until that of
modern Europe, but democracy never gets a single word in the Bible. Solon
invented the right of appeal and trial by jury, whereby an assembly of citizens
chosen at random, without regard for office or wealth or birth, gave all legal
verdicts. Moses can claim nothing as fundamental as these developments, which
are absolutely essential to modern society. The concept of taking a government
official to court for malfeasance we owe to Solon. We read nothing of the kind
about Moses. The idea of allowing foreigners who have mastered a useful trade to
immigrate and become citizens is also an original invention of Solon--indeed,
the modern concept of citizenship itself is largely indebted to him. There is
nothing like this in the Bible. And like our own George Washington, Solon
declined the offer to become ruler in his country, giving it a Constitution
instead--unlike Moses who gave laws yet continued to reign. And Solon's selfless
creation of the Athenian constitution set the course which led to the rise of
the first universal democracy in the United States, and it was to Solon's
Athens, not the Bible, that our Founding Fathers looked for guidance in
constructing a new State. Moses can claim no responsibility for this. If we had
Solon and no Moses, we would very likely still be where we are today. But if we
had Moses and no Solon, democracy might never have existed at all.

So much for being the impetus behind our Constitution. The Ten Commandments of
Moses have no connection with that, while the Constitution of Solon has
everything to do with it. But what about ethics? Let us examine the Ten
Commandments offered by each of these men and compare their worth and
significance to Western society. Of course, neither man's list was unique to
him--Moses was merely borrowing ideas that had already been chiseled in stone
centuries before by Hammurabi, King of Babylon (and unlike the supposed tablets
of Moses, the Stone of Hammurabi still exists and is on display in the Louvre).
Likewise, Solon's Ten Ethical Dicta were a reflection and refinement of wisdom
that was already ancient in his day. And in both cases the association of these
men with their moral precepts is as likely legend as fact, but the existence and
reverence for their sayings in their respective cultures was still real-- and we
can ask three questions: Which list of Ten Commandments lies more at the heart
of modern Western moral ideals? Which contains concepts that are more
responsible for our current social success and humanity? And which is more
profound and more fitting for a free society?

The Ten Commandments of Moses (Deuteronomy 5:6-21, Exodus 20:3-16) run as
follows--and I am even going out of my way to leave out the bounteous and
blatantly-religious language that actually surrounds them in the original text,
as well as the tacit approval of slavery present in the fourth commandment, none
of which is even remotely suitable for political endorsement by a free republic:

1. Have no other gods before me [the God of the Hebrews].
2. Make no images of anything in heaven, earth or the sea, and do not worship or
labor for them. 3. Do not vainly use the name of your God [the God of the
Hebrews]. 4. Do no work on the seventh day of the week. 5. Honor your parents.
6. Do not kill. 7. Do not commit adultery. 8. Do not steal. 9. Do not give false
testimony against another. 10. Do not desire another's wife or anything that
belongs to another.

Now, we can see at once that our society is entirely opposed to the first four,
and indeed the last of these ten. As a capitalist society, we scoff at the idea
of closing our shops on a choice market day. And our very goal in life is to
desire--desiring is what drives us toward success and prosperity. The phrase
"seeking the American Dream," which lies at the heart of our social world, has
at its heart the very idea of coveting the success of our peers, goading us to
match it with our own industry, and we owe all our monumental national success
to this. Finally, our ideals of religious liberty and free speech, essential to
any truly civil society, compel us to abhor the first three commandments. Thus,
already half of Moses' doctrines cannot be the foundation of our modern society-
-to the contrary, they are anathema to modern ideals.

Of the rest, it can be assured that shunning adultery has never contributed to
the rise of civil rights and democratic principles (despite much trying, there
is no Adultery Amendment). It is naturally regarded as immoral--but then it
always has been, by all societies, before and since the time of Moses, for the
simple reason that it, like lying, theft, and murder, does harm to others, and
thus these commandments are as redundant as they are unprofound. They can be
more usefully summed up with just three words: do no harm. These words comprise
the first commandment of another Greek moralist whose contribution to society
lies at the very heart of modern reality: the founder of scientific medicine,
Hippocrates.

Finally, we are left with only one commandment, to honor our parents. This of
course has been a foundational principle of every society ever since such things
as "societies" existed. Yet the greatest advances in civil rights and civic
moral consciousness in human history occurred precisely as the result not of
obeying, but of disobeying this very commandment: the social revolutions of the
sixties, naturally abhorred by conservatives and yet spearheaded by rebellious
teenagers and young adults, nevertheless secured the moral rights of women and
minorities--something unprecedented in human history--and by opposing the
Vietnam  war, our children displayed for the first time a massive popular
movement in defense of the very pacifism which Christians boast of having
introduced into the world, yet are usually the last to actually stand up for. It
can even be said that our entire moral ethos is one of thinking for ourselves,
of rebellion and moral autonomy, of daring to stand up against even our elders
when our conscience compels it. Thus, it would seem that even this commandment
does not lie at the heart of our modern society--it is largely an anachronism,
lacking the essential nuances that a more profound ethic promotes. Let us now
turn to the Ten Commandments of Solon (Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent
Philosophers, 1.60), which run as follows:

1. Trust good character more than promises.
2. Do not speak falsely.
3. Do good things.
4. Do not be hasty in making friends, but do not abandon them once made.
5. Learn to obey before you command.
6. When giving advice, do not recommend what is most pleasing, but what is most
useful. 7. Make reason your supreme commander. 8. Do not associate with people
who do bad things. 9. Honor the gods. 10. Have regard for your parents.

Unlike the Commandments of Moses, none of these is outdated or antithetical to
modern moral or political thought. Every one could be taken up by anyone today,
of any creed--except perhaps only one. And indeed, there is something much more
profound in these commandments. They are far more useful as precepts for living
one's life. Can society, can government, prevail and prosper if we fail to
uphold the First Commandment of Moses? By our own written declaration of
religious liberty for all, we have staked our entire national destiny on the
belief that we not only can get by without it, but we ought to abolish it
entirely. Yet what if we were to fail to uphold Solon's first commandment? The
danger to society would be clear--indeed, doesn't this commandment speak to the
heart of what makes or breaks a democratic society? Isn't it absolutely
fundamental that we not trust the promises of politicians and flatterers, but
elect our leaders and choose our friends instead by taking the trouble to
evaluate the goodness of their character? This, then, can truly be said to be an
ideal that is fundamental to modern moral and political thought.

Now, two of the commandments of Solon are almost identical to those advocated by
Moses: do not speak falsely, and have regard for your parents. Of course, Solon
does not restrict his first injunction to false accusations or testimony against
others, as Moses does. Solon's commandment is more profound and thus more
fundamental, and is properly qualified by the other commandments in just the way
we believe is appropriate--for Solon's rules allow one to lie if doing so is a
good deed (no such prescription to do good appears in the Ten Commandments of
Moses). And whereas Moses calls us to honor our parents (in the Hebrew, from
kabed, "to honor, to glorify"), Solon's choice of words is more appropriate--he
only asks us to treat our parents in a respectful way (in the Greek, from
aideomai, "to show a sense of regard for, to have compassion upon"), which we
can do even if we disobey or oppose them, and even if we disapprove of their
character and thus have no grounds to honor them.

In contrast with Moses, Solon wastes no words with legalisms--he sums up
everything in three words: do good things. This is an essential moral
principle, lacking from the commands of Moses, which allows one to qualify all
the others. And instead of simply commanding us to follow rules, Solon's
commandments involve significant social and political advice: temper our
readiness to rebel and to do our own thing (which Solon does not prohibit) by
learning first how to follow others; take care when making friends, and stick by
them; always give good advice--don't just say what people want to hear; shun bad
people. It can be said without doubt that this advice is exactly what we need in
order to be successful and secure--as individuals, as communities, and even as a
nation. The ideals represented by these commandments really do rest at the
foundation of modern American morality and society, and would be far more useful
for school children whose greatest dangers are peer influence, rashness and
naivete.

There is but one that might give a secularist pause: Solon's commandment to
honor the gods (in the Greek, tima�, "to honor, to revere, to pay due regard").
Yet when we compare it to the similar First Three Commandments of Moses, we see
how much more Solon's single religious commandment can be made to suit our
society and our civic ideals: it does not have to restrict religious freedom,
for it does not demand that we believe in anyone's god or follow anyone's
religious rules. It remains in the appropriate plural. Solon asks us to give the
plethora of gods the regard that they are due, and we can say that some gods are
not due much--such as the racist gods and gods of hellfire. In the end, it is
good to be respectful of the gods of others, which we can do even if we are
criticizing them, even if we disbelieve in them. This would remain true to our
most prized American ethic of religious liberty and civility. Though it might
better be rendered now, "Respect the religions of others," there is something
fitting in admitting that there are many gods, the many that people invent and
hope for.

It is clear then, that if anyone's commandments ought to be posted on school and
courthouse walls, it should be Solon's. He has more right as the founder of our
civic ideals, and as a more profound and almost modern moral thinker. His
commandments are more befitting our civil society, more representative of what
we really believe and what we cherish in our laws and economy. And indeed, in
the end, they are essentially secular. Is it an accident that when Solon's
ideals reigned, there grew democracies and civil rights, and ideals we now
consider fundamental to modern Western society, yet when the ideals of Moses
replaced them, we had a thousand years of oppression, darkness, and tyranny? Is
it coincidence that when the ideals of Moses were replaced with those of Solon,
when men decided to fight and die not for the Ten Commandments but for the
resurrection of Athenian civil society, we ended up with the great Democratic
Revolutions and the social and legal structures that we now take for granted as
the height and glory of human achievement and moral goodness? I think we owe our
thanks to Solon. Moses did nothing for us--his laws were neither original nor
significant in comparison. When people cry for the hanging of the Ten
Commandments of Moses on school and court walls, I am astonished. Solon's Ten
Commandments have far more right to hang in those places than those of Moses.
The Athenian's Commandments are far more noble and profound, and far more
appropriate to a free society. Who would have guessed this of a pagan? Maybe
everyone of sense.

What Do You Think?
Submit feedback for inclusion on our feedback page
Related Articles
"The Little Known Literary Battles Between the Gospel Writers" by James W.
Deardorff http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/james_deardorff/battles.html
"Kooks and Quacks of the Roman Empire: a look into the world of the gospels" by
Richard Carrier
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/kooks.html "Reliability
and Belief" by James Still
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/james_still/reliability.html

Copyright �Internet Infidels 1995-1999. All rights reserved.

End<{{

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

------- End of forwarded message -------

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to