I see this author's name debated here.
  This article covers a good deal of info about
 McCaffrey's involvement in the Gulf War via an
 interview with Hersh.  (in last week's LA Weekly)
 Peter.

 http://www.laweekly.com/ink/00/29/news.shtml
  See No Evil
 Seymour Hersh talks about his expos� of the Gulf War

 by Sara Catania

 Spoiling the perfect
 war: Seymour Hersh
 Phot by AP/Wide World
 Celebrated journalist Seymour M. Hersh first earned
 his investigative stripes in 1969, when he uncovered
 the My Lai massacre and refused to let the story
 die.
 His account of the U.S. military atrocity in Vietnam
 was rejected by major news outlets, so Hersh and a
 friend created their own syndicate overnight,
 distributing the article to newspapers around the
 country until, several days later, the New York
 Times finally bought the piece. Hersh�s work won him
a
 Pulitzer, and he�s continued digging into military
 and political cesspools, including the CIA�s bombing
of Cambodia and its actions against Chile�s Salvador
 Allende.

 Hersh has published seven books on subjects ranging
 from Henry Kissinger, to the downed Korean Air jet,
 to the Israeli nuclear-bomb program, each of which
has
 attracted its share of controversy. His last book,
 The Dark Side of Camelot, an expos� of Robert and
John
 F. Kennedy�s sexual and political escapades, was
 dismissed by many longtime Hersh admirers as
 sensationalistic and irrelevant.

 With his most recent work, a 25,000-word story
 entitled �Overwhelming Force,� in the May 22 issue
 of The New Yorker, Hersh appears to be back on track.
 �Overwhelming Force� chronicles the extreme actions
 of much-decorated U.S. Army General Barry McCaffrey,
 who led his division in one of the biggest and most
 one-sided battles of the Gulf War. Hersh spent six
 months on the story, conducting more than 300
 interviews. He pieced together a narrative that led
 him to conclude that �McCaffrey�s offensive was not
 so much a counterattack as a systematic destruction
of
 Iraqis who were generally fulfilling the
 requirements of the retreat.� The Army�s own
investigations found no wrongdoing, and McCaffrey has
vehemently denied misconduct.

 In the weeks since the article appeared, it has been
 hotly debated on television talk shows, in the pages
 of the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal,
 and on the letters page of The New Yorker itself.
Weekly staff writer Sara Catania spoke with Hersh by
phone from his Washington, D.C., office.
>
>
>
> WEEKLY: Barry McCaffrey is now the Clinton
> administration�s drug czar. Before you started
> working
> on this story about McCaffrey�s conduct in the Gulf
> War, you were pursuing a story about his work in
> Latin
> America. What initially drew you to McCaffrey?
>
> HERSH: I was interested in writing about the drug
> war,
> and McCaffrey personifies that. A friend in the
> intelligence community who knows McCaffrey said to
> me,
> �Sy, if you liked Saigon in 1962 you�re gonna love
> Bogota 2000.� When you hear something like that, you
> go, �Whoa.� So I started looking into Colombia. I
> was
> meeting with an old friend and I mentioned
> McCaffrey,
> and this guy said to me, �The story you want to
> write
> about is what McCaffrey did in the Gulf War after
> the
> cease-fire. What happened with prisoners of war in
> his
> division.� So I started looking into it, and pretty
> soon I knew we were going to be eyeball-to-eyeball
> with the guy, with some serious stuff.
>
> How would you characterize McCaffrey as a military
> man? Is he is an anomaly, or does he represent some
> larger problem?
>
> McCaffrey�s power generated from the fact that he
> could make or break careers. I doubt if there are
> many
> officers as egocentric as McCaffrey. I�ve never met
> anybody like him. I�ve never known anybody who
> serves
> with such control. The way he abused the military
> structure is pretty extreme. McCaffrey, with his
> eloquence and his attractiveness and his heroism,
> he�s
> totally unafraid and he�s a great wartime leader. It
> made him terribly appealing to the younger officers.
> It was the other stuff you couldn�t see, that I
> write
> about, that was much more difficult. If McCaffrey�s
> division � the 24th was so well trained, so almost
> choreographed � had run into a real combat
> situation,
> I�m sure they would have done well, and McCaffrey
> would have been able to call himself the next
> Patton,
> as he liked to do. But they didn�t. They ran into
> nothing. And that�s when the problems began.
>
> After the piece came out, McCaffrey cited specific
> facts that he said you got wrong. For example, your
> sources told you that the retreating Iraqis were
> leaving the battlefield and that their cannons were
> reversed and secured. McCaffrey said that wasn�t
> true.
>
> On page 63 of the article in The New Yorker there�s
> a
> large color photograph, a fantastic photograph that
> came from one of McCaffrey�s staff aides. We did not
> draw a lot of attention to it, because The New
> Yorker�s got this wonderful sort of understated way.
> On the right is an armored vehicle that was being
> hauled when it was destroyed. It was off-road, on a
> carrier that was driving it out of the war zone, as
> it
> was supposed to have been doing under the
> cease-fire.
> Most of the force was on carriers just like that
> one.
> A small percentage was not. One of the real concerns
> the Iraqis had was that there was a lot of dissent
> inside the Iraqi military itself. They weren�t
> worried
> about the Americans as much as they were, possibly,
> about internecine warfare. To suggest, as McCaffrey
> has, that they were all in fighting mode is bizarre.
> Because they were in retreat. McCaffrey says some
> were
> firing. Yes, it is true that at the end of the
> four-hour assault some of the fighting guys, knowing
> they were going to be destroyed, got their tanks
> together and formed a circle and just started
> shooting
> in the air. McCaffrey isn�t totally wrong, but it�s
> a
> great distortion of what the reality was, and in his
> own photograph there he is, standing next to a
> burning
> vehicle being towed away.
>
> In �Overwhelming Force,� you recount several
> instances
> of U.S. troops firing on unarmed or retreating
> Iraqis.
> In one case, Iraqis are led off a hospital bus,
> disarmed and lined up in rows in the desert. In
> another incident, civilians are walking toward a
> building carrying a white flag. You make it very
> clear
> that these Iraqis were killed, though no one you
> interview actually witnessed the prisoners being
> shot.
> Army investigations of both incidents found no
> deaths
> or injuries. You said recently that you didn�t go to
> Baghdad while working on the story because you
> didn�t
> want the Army to accuse you of consorting with the
> enemy. Would a trip now shed any more light on these
> accounts?
>
> I�m toying with the idea. But it�s the same problem
> with any wartime information. One of the things I
> learned in doing My Lai . . . The My Lai massacre
> took
> place in the middle of March 1968. I reported about
> it
> 18 months later. But two weeks after it took place,
> the Paris peace talks began between the North
> Vietnamese and the South Vietnamese and the U.S.,
> and
> on the second or third day of those talks, in 1968,
> [shortly] after the My Lai massacre, the North
> Vietnamese delegation put out a long, explicit
> statement about what happened and sent it out to the
> international press, the American press, and nobody
> wrote a thing. I didn�t know about it until after I
> did my My Lai work. The problem is, anything that�s
> put out by a government with which we�re at war we
> tend to discount, so that�s an issue for me. If I
> were
> to go to Iraq and meet some of the people who maybe
> were at that scene, I don�t know if that would be
> helpful or not. If you remember, in the article I
> wrote about a tape. Well, that tape�s been enhanced
> enormously, and ABC�s been working on it for weeks.
> I
> hope they go public with it soon. On the enhanced
> tape
> the people that did the shooting are heard speaking,
> talking about what they did.
>
> What are they saying?
>
> Well, we have a group of scout soldiers that
> collected
> around 400 prisoners who came off an Iraqi hospital
> bus. They took the weapons away and they were
> ordered
> to leave their prisoners. As they were pulling away,
> one of McCaffrey�s battalions came on line � 13 or
> 14
> tanks � saw the prisoners and started shooting. On
> the
> tape we hear the scout platoon, as they are leaving,
> screaming because they were being shot at. At one
> point, they actually have radio contact � which is
> only brought out by enhancement � with various
> members
> of the shooting unit.
>
> So what the enhancement brings to light is the
> actual
> people who were doing the shooting?
>
> The now-enhanced tape definitely shows the follow-on
> company was talking about the shooting of people.
>
> You�ve spent the last three decades digging into the
> murkiest depths of American politics and government.
> How do the incidents you describe in �Overwhelming
> Force� fit into that continuum?
>
> They�re all my babies. This one bothers me the most
> .
> .. . It doesn�t bother me more than My Lai. My Lai
> was
> devastating. In the end, I spent a long time talking
> to the kids that did the killing. And they ended up
> figuring out that the kids who did the killing �
> most
> of them uneducated, lower-middle-class, many not
> with
> high school degrees � were as much victims as the
> people they murdered. I could come to terms with it
> that way. In this case, what bothers me about the
> Gulf
> War is that in the 24th Division there was no war.
> And
> there was no press there, and so I just wonder what
> happened elsewhere. Was there much war elsewhere?
> I�m
> not sure. What was this victory? What was the war
> about? Those are some of the questions I don�t have
> answers to.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =====
> Help Preserve the Last of Los Angeles Open
> Space!http://lawetlands.org      Save The Ballona!!!
> BOYCOTT MorganStanleyDeanWitter DISCOVER CARD,
> Goldman Sachs
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Worldwide Calling with Firetalk!
> Click Here:
>
http://click.egroups.com/1/5481/8/_/9911/_/961116168/
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>


=====
Help Preserve the Last of Los Angeles Open Space!http://lawetlands.org      Save The 
Ballona!!!
BOYCOTT MorganStanleyDeanWitter DISCOVER CARD, Goldman Sachs

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------
The world's largest musician community, with over 50,000 gear
reviews and over 15,000 pages of content, is a click away.
http://click.egroups.com/1/3737/5/_/475667/_/961142807/
------------------------------------------------------------------------




Reply via email to