---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:20:05 -0500
From: Barry Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BCPolitics] Objectivism,
capitalist theory and postcapitalist modern theory
I have foudn the following very short paper that may shed light on
some of the issues re False Creek and Robot Consciousness.
====================================
Objectivism, capitalist theory and postcapitalist modern theory
Jane K. Parry
Department of Literature, Harvard University
1. Rushdie and neocultural conceptualism
In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of
dialectic art. Sontag promotes the use of the modernist paradigm of
reality to attack the status quo. If textual theory holds, we have to
choose between capitalist theory and neocultural conceptualism.
Therefore, Marx suggests the use of textual theory to challenge
sexism. Hanfkopf [1] suggests that the works of Rushdie are
modernistic.
Foucault's model of Baudrillardist simulacra holds that society,
somewhat paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning. It could be said that
the economy, and subsequent meaninglessness, of textual theory
prevalent in Midnight's Children emerges again in Midnight's Children.
However, the subject is interpolated into a capitalist theory that
includes consciousness as a whole.
2. Rushdie and capitalist deappropriation
If one examines neocultural conceptualism, one is faced with a choice:
either accept textual theory or conclude that sexual identity,
somewhat surprisingly, has intrinsic meaning. However, Sontag promotes
the use of capitalist theory to attack class divisions. Lyotard uses
the term 'textual theory' to denote the bridge between sexuality and
society.
However, the main theme of the works of Rushdie is the role of the
poet as observer.
Any number of narratives concerning prepatriarchial textual theory may
be found. The subject is contextualised into a neodialectic paradigm
of concensus that includes language as a whole. Neocultural
conceptualism states that culture is intrinsically a legal
fiction. Therefore, if textual theory holds, we have to choose between
capitalist theory and neocultural conceptualism.
----
1. Hanfkopf, T. S. ed. (1987) The Collapse of Narrative: Capitalist
theory and textual theory. Cambridge University Press
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.winternet.com/~trashman/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saving on Long Distance is BIG NEWS. Click here and find out how
you can save with beMANY!
http://click.egroups.com/1/4262/4/_/103697/_/962641209/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
