from:
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/">The Architecture of
Modern Political Power</A>
-----
Agency of Fear
Opiates and Political Power in America
By Edward Jay Epstein

PREFACE
 This book is based on the view that the American president under ordinary
circumstances reigns rather than rules over the government of the United
States. To be sure, the president is nominally in command of the executive
branch of the government, and he has the authority to fire the officials that
in fact control such critical agencies as the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Internal Revenue Service,
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the criminal division of the Department of
Justice, etc. (though he does not in many cases have the authority
unilaterally to appoint a replacement). In practice, however, this
presidential power is severely mitigated, if not entirely counterbalanced, by
the ability of officials in these key agencies to disclose secrets and
private evaluations to the public that could severely damage the image of the
president.

For example, in theory, six presidents, from Franklin Roosevelt to Richard
Nixon, had the power to fire J. Edgar Hoover as head of the FBI, but in each
case he had the power to retaliate by revealing illicit activities that
occurred during their administrations (as well as information about the
private lives of the presidents). This potential for retribution by
government officials is compounded by the fact that in the vast complexity of
the executive branch a president cannot be sure where embarrassing secrets
exist, and he must assume that most officials have developed subterranean
channels to journalists, who will both conceal their sources and give wide
circulation to the "leak." A president could seize control over the various
parts of the government only if he first nullified the threat of disclosures
by severing the conduits through which dissidents might leak scandalous
information to the press. This prerequisite for power is in fact exactly what
President Nixon attempted when he set up a series of special units which, it
was hoped, would conduct clandestine surveillance of both government
officials and newsmen during his first administration. If he had succeeded in
establishing such an investigative force, he would have so radically changed
the balance of power within the government that it would have been tantamount
to an American coup d'etat.

A coup d'etat is not the same as a revolution, where power is seized by those
outside the government, or even necessarily a military putsch, whereby the
military government takes over from the civilian government; it is, as Edward
Luttwak points out in his book Coup d'Etat, "a seizure of power within the
present system." The technique of the coup involves the use of one part of
the government to disrupt communications between other parts of the
government, confounding and paralyzing noncooperating agencies while
displacing the dissident cliques from power. If successful, the organizers of
the coup can gain control over all the levers of real power in the
government, then legitimize the new configuration under the name of
eliminating some great evil in society. Though it is hard to conceive of the
technique of the coup being applied to American politics, Nixon, realizing
that he securely controlled only the office of the president, methodically
moved to destroy the informal system of leaks and independent fiefdoms. Under
the aegis of a "war on heroin," a series of new offices were set up, by
executive order, such as the Office of Drug Abuse Law Enforcement and the
Office of National Narcotics Intelligence,- which, it was hoped, would
provide the president with investigative agencies having the potential and
the wherewithal and personnel to assume the functions of "the Plumbers" on a
far grander scale. According to the White House scenario, these new
investigative functions would be legitimized by the need to eradicate the
evil of drug addiction.

In describing the inner workings of the "war on heroin" I have relied heavily
on the files supplied to me by Egil Krogh, Jr., who was the president's
deputy for law enforcement before he was imprisoned for his role in the
Plumbers' operations. This archive includes verbatim transcripts of'
conversations the president had with presidential advisors; handwritten notes
describing meetings between John Ehrlichman, John Mitchell, H. R. Haldeman,
and other principals in the administration's "crusade"; option papers drafted
for the Domestic Council; scenarios designed for the media; internal analyses
of political problems; drafts of presidential speeches; private reports on
the drug problem; briefings for the press; and outlines of conversations
Krogh had with the president. Krogh, after he was released from prison, spent
more than three weeks assisting me in analyzing the material, and I then went
over many of the documents with Jeffrey Donfeld, who was Krogh's assistant on
the Domestic Council. The archive is by no means complete-the White House
retained a large portion of Krogh's files-and it presents information only
from the perspective of the White House. I therefore filled in the archive by
interviewing officials in the various agencies that were to be affected by
the White House plans for a "reorganization." These interviews took over
three years, and reflect personal animosities as well as bureaucratic
perspectives. Because the circumstances surrounding each interview bear direct
ly on the credibility of the interview-why, for example, did Krogh provide me
with such embarrassing documents?-I have decided to reveal all the sources
for this book and comment on the motives, problems, contradictions, and gaps
that I found in the interviews and documents. Unless otherwise specified,
whenever references are made to persons explaining, commenting, observing or
otherwise divulging information, they were made to me for the purposes of
this book, and a fuller explanation of when, where, and why is provided in
the final section of the book. Books and documents are listed in the
Bibliography.

The research for this book was financed in large part by the Drug Abuse
Council, Inc., a privately financed foundation which was established to
provide another perspective on problems of drug abuse. Assistance was also
provided by National Affairs, Inc., the Smith Richardson Foundation, and the
Police Foundation. Esquire helped subsidize my reportage of poppy-growing in
Turkey, and The Public Interest magazine supported my investigation of
methadone clinics and helped me obtain the Krogh file. Research on various
parts of the book was done for me by Hillary Mayer, Suzanna Duncan, Elizabeth
Guthrie, and Deborah Gieringer, to all of whom I am grateful.
I am also indebted, for their insights into the political process, to Edward
Banfield, Daniel Bell, Allan Bloom, Edward Chase, Nathan Glazer, Erving
Goffman, Andrew Hacker, William Haddad, Paul Halpern, Bruce Kovner, Irving
Kristol, Edward Luttwak, Jerry Mandel, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Victor
Navasky, Bruce Page, Norman Podhoretz, Mark Platner, John Rubenstein, William
Shawn, Jonathan Shell, Leslie Steinau, Edward Thompson, Lionel Tiger, Paul
Weaver, William Whitworth, and James Q. Wilson. The conclusions that I draw
from their insights are, of course, entirely my own.
E. J. E.
 NEW YORK CITY, 1976

Other books by Edward Jay Epstein

*   Inquest: The Warren Commission and the Establishment of Truth
*   Counterplot: The Garrison Case
*   News From Nowhere
*   Between Fact and Fiction



------------------------------------------------------------------------
 -----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to