Lois,
It's obvious these relationships go back a long way. When you look at
George Bush, you can easily see he didn't create anything on his own. What
he has was handed to him by someone, and he only gets a small piece of the
action. The theory I've expressed is that his ties go back primarily to the
Scottish insurance sector which was linked to London bankers through the
chartered companies like Hudson's Bay Company which was controlled by the
same guys who were at Lazard Brothers at the time the Rockefellers were
gearing up. I think they indoctrinate their sons to look around for
inventions and creativity for them to buy cheap--or steal, if the the
person with the creative energy squawks. What I would like to do is figure
out the process which these guys have followed for centuries so we can more
easily cut them off at the pass.
I believe Bush works for the network that set up Prohibition in Canada and
then the U.S. to make alcohol illegal in order to utilize the smuggling
network they had created for drugs. This involves the Bronfman sector and
also the transcontinental railroad system which was financed largely by
British bonds. The bondholders acquired huge interests in land grants all
over the country, but especially in Texas, Arizona and other states along
their roads--probably California, but I don't know much about that. The
Scottish land structure has a strong emphasis on separating the fee simple
title from the leasehold estate, so you can have two owners of the land
operating on the same piece of real estate at the same time--each mortgaging
their interests. The bottom line is how to bring in the highest income from
one piece of soil. Bill Zeckendorf explains this best in his autobiography,
and it was obvious he had been tutored in how to do it by masters who were
in charge of making investments for the London banks.
The networks I'm talking about came into being as early as 1688 when the
William of Orange was brought from Holland to London to become king. The
noblemen who supported him in this effort were the ones who acquired stock
in the Bank of England which he set up. It is those investments which have
set up the multinational corporate structure that appears to be based in the
U.S. And they are the ones controlling the intelligence operations
worldwide. They were the creatures who were behind the financing of Hitler
and also his demise, so they could loot the German industrial system. They
set up the Tavistock psychological warfare studies, as well as Ewen
Cameron's research in Canada. I suspect they were behind the protection of
the paperclip scientists because their mentality is the same.
The Scots and Orangemen are both Presbyterian and Jesuit, but both are
Masonic. They gloat over their distilling industry, but I suspect they
would also love to get a monopoly on liquor and move into wineries as well.
I do know that there were connections between the Texas oilmen and the San
Diego area of California. It was Murchison and Sid Richardson who owned the
Del Charro racetrack where J. Edgar Hoover and Clyde Tolson spent their
vacation every year gambling for free. When I was doing research into some
of the Houston land developers, one thing that stood out was that they
seemed to move freely back and forth between Houston, San Diego and Phoenix.
Pete Brewton mentioned that in his book when he talked about Robert Corson.
My personal belief is that the bondholders I was talking about earlier had
acquired huge amounts of land that was primarily in desert areas of the
south. Brian Quig has indicated that around Phoenix, the Seligmans had
hundreds of thousands of acres. My theory is that they were acting as
nominees of the investors and were compelled to get that investment back for
them, so they had to figure out how to make the land pay off.
In Texas in the 1930s through the 50s there was a big push for rural
electricity. The real motive was the hidden owners wanted dams built at
government expense for irrigation so the surrounding land would be more
valuable. The engineers and politicians connected to this big push were the
ones who financed LBJ. And LBJ was already connected to the
Roosevelt-Delano network which had been running drugs and laundering money
for years through the network set up by Russel & Co. of which the Delano
family was an intricate part. FDR was probably an unwitting tool of the T.
Roosevelt family which appears to have been involved in the smuggling
network in Europe before he was born. When his father married a Delano,
that helped to merge the European operation with the Hong Kong connection
the Delanos had from their involvement in Russell & Co., which set up Skull
and Bones in 1832 about the same time the opium smugglers returned to the
U.S. and started building railroads that spanned the country from east to
west and north to south, intersecting around Omaha and St. Louis.
My thought is that there is a huge pool of capital owned by families who
wish to remain unknown and behind the scenes (much like the wizard of Oz).
Through their control of the Masonic structure, they are able to hire
retainers who will handle their investments from one generation to the next
and pretend the money is their own. But of course there's a secret trust
agreement that cannot be disclosed under penalty of death. When we believe
the front men who seem to be doing all the evil deeds are operating only out
of their own self-interest, we have fallen into the trap. We have to keep
the process of how all this works in our minds and try to reveal to the
public who is really profiting from the schemes that are ruining our country
and the world.
MHO.
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: Lois Battuello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linda Minor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Catherine Austin Fitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, July 23, 2000 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: WACO
>Dear Linda,
>
>Quayle seems the epitomy of the machinery you describe below ... Bill
>Bradley may have been a counter-balance to a large degree, with savvy in
>this area given his home state ...
>
>Either way, McCain wasn't a part of that machinery and it was not logical
to
>believe he would be selected VP ... we all know it has to be someone very
>close to the machinery -- a Keating, Danforth or Cheney to keep the govt.
>under control for the Nazi-Gambino network.
>
>I think the collective countries of Europe through the EU are bringing the
>action against big tobacco to take apart the smuggling routes. It is
>through these routes that American and British intelligence that service
>the machinery have operated with all manner of smuggling ... from missing
>kids, to women, to agents, to bombs, to gold, to contraband of any type.
>During WWII they (the routes) were actively used to slip certain agents
>around; to safely remove the Nazi elements from Germany, Austria, those who
>had infiltrated other European Countries, heroin for morphine ... the
>Vatican side of this is without a doubt one of the more evil ... If the EU
>can disrupt through exposure key people and systems within the network it
>would be a terrific gain for "the people" everywhere.
>
>I see some fairly unusual things happen through my small community that
>bespeak of the networks. When it comes to tobacco, it's here too through
>U.S. Tobacco (UST), largest producer of chewing (smokeless) tobacco.
>
>When Anne Gianinni McWilliams (granddaughter of the late A.P. Gianinni of B
>of A, member of Board of Economic Warfare, fascist immune from difficulties
>with Mussolini for his operations in Italy) was found to be holding an ATF
>bond for her Villa Mt. Eden Winery while serving on the Board of the Bank
>and having her "input" about the wine industry, she was required to give up
>her bank Board position or give up her wine-making. Now this shows someone
>had some power somewhere to accomplish this, or Anne was simply unaware of
>her conflicted position, B of A the largest lender in the industry as well.
>Somehow she was channeled to UST so that organized crime has her Villa Mt.
>Eden label!
>
>The very people I issue with now in the Kornell warehouse fire situation
are
>Rich Frank who deliveres his crops to UST's operations -- did before it
>became Villa Mt. Eden (then Conn Creek Winery which Koerner Rombauer ruined
>to bring UST in). They were notorious long before Anne transferred/sold
her
>name/label assets to them. One of the reasons she just didn't say no to
the
>bunch is the Disney deposit base that kept B of A in cash when it had been
>so gutted through BCCI capers and others. To read the papers one would
>think B of A won by selling out their position in BCCI for huge sums, but
>the fact was, BCCI was literally a part of them ... many people were "on
>board" B of A during the entire reign of BCCI and after to handle specific
>functions ... A.P. and the Rockefellers were friendly rivals for years ...
>sharing positions West meets East in banking during WWII on Board of
>Economic Warfare. Rockefeller and Gianinni had all of South America at
>their feet during the war years and are some of the financial machinery
that
>helped oil the fascist cause in South America after WWII and much of the
>"safe harboring" or Nazis slipped out of Europe. I don't write this to
>undermine the signficant work of P-2 in this matter and fascist causes in
>South America over the years, and their banking networks.
>
>A.P. took a chance with the struggling Walt Disney, and was the financier
of
>his success ... and kept a tight rein on him to keep control of the banking
>relationship throughout. Even in the present Disney was livid about the
>merger of B of A INTO NationsBanc (with the B of A name being retained,
just
>as Buffett actually acquired Disney but kept the Disney name and Michael
>Eisner on a tighter leash).
>
>Just yesterday an article carried in the Press Democrat indicated Disney
>will begin yet a third theme park AFTER California Adventure opens in
>February 2001 in Anaheim next to the "mother park" ... and again it will be
>a multi-billion project .... but right there in Anaheim. Hopefully Eisner
>will stay there where he belongs and his "distraction" will continue to be
>pulled away from using the mob to knock people off their land for his
>historyland theme park visions.
>
>I call discreet attention to wine shoppers. If you go to
www.hitimewine.com
>and click on red wines, as you read through Zinfandel and get to the "S's"
>you will see "Spelletich Shenandoah Valley Zinfandel." This is all related
>to Rich Frank of Disney and their forrays there. Seems there are some
>vineyards in the Shenandoah Valley related to some of the then-Disney
>executive land grabs there ... now they have grape vines, and the fruit
>crushed and the bulk wine shipped out to Rich Frank's Frank-Rombauer
>(Kornell) and pass it off on Spelletich, one of the alternating proprietors
>operating at the site as an independent winemaker to process and sell!
>Problem is, while Spelletich family may never have seen the use permit,
both
>Rich Frank and Koerner Rombauer know 100% of the grapes used at their site
>have to be from Napa Valley for all additional gallons processed.
>Spelletich is "additional gallons." How could anyone ever say there is no
>Shenandoah - Napa Valley connection through Disney with this type of
>conspicuous behavior!!!!!!!!!! (I think it's a '98 vintage, by the way).
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Linda Minor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Lois Battuello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "kate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: "Catherine Austin Fitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 8:44 PM
>Subject: Re: WACO
>
>
>> Is this the Danforth we're talking about? This says he's from St.
>Louis.
>>
>> I think the key factor we're dealing with is who were the clients of
Brown
>> Brothers Harriman when Prescott Bush and his wife's father, George H.
>> Walker, worked for them. We have to remember that it was these investors
>> who funded George H.W. Walker's campaigns. His biggest contributors were
>> his uncle Herbie Walker, formerly of St. Louis, and Eugene Meyer, whose
>> father spent his entire career working for a competing investment
>> bank--Lazard Freres--or Lazard Brothers, as it was called in London.
>>
>> Lazard Brothers was controlled by officials in the British government.
It
>> was always the investment bank of David Rockefeller. And, besides Meyer
>and
>> Walker, George Bush's other large investor in Bush-Overbey was British
>> Assets Trust, Ltd., an investment company whose directors interlocked
with
>> the management of companies associated with Lord Kindersley, such as
>Hudson'
>> s Bay Company. The chairman of British Assets Trust in 1956 was J.G.S.
>> Gammell in Edinburgh, Scotland, and in 1985 by J.C.R. Inglis, a partner
in
>> Shepherd & Wedderburn, WS, an Edinburgh law firm. Inglis was also a
>> director of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Scottish Provident
>Institution
>> for Mutual Life Assurance, Edinburgh American Assets Trust and Atlantic
>> Assets Trust, as well as chairman of European Assets, N.V., Gammell
also
>> had served as director of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, as did such
>> other notables as The Right Hon. Lord Balfour of Burleigh, The Right Hon.
>> Lord Clydesmuir and The Right Hon. Lord Polwarth. Polwarth,
incidentally,
>> began serving as a director of the Halliburton Company, parent of Brown &
>> Root, in 1974.
>>
>> So my theory is that these guys have been running George Bush's family
>from
>> day one, and nothing has changed. The same guys are running these
>potential
>> veeps. Also, I've always wondered whether there's any way to prove
>whether
>> J. Danforth Quayle was related to John Danforth.
>>
>> Linda
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=D000030
>>
>> DANFORTH, John Claggett, 1936-
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>--
>> ----
>> Years of Service: 1976-1995
>> Party: Republican
>>
>>
>> DANFORTH, John Claggett, a Senator from Missouri; born in St. Louis, St.
>> Louis County, Mo., September 5, 1936; graduated, St. Louis County Day
>(High)
>> School 1954; graduated, Princeton University 1958 and Yale University Law
>> School and Yale Divinity School 1963; admitted to the New York bar in
1963
>> and commenced practice in New York City; ordained clergy, Episcopal
Church
>> 1963; attorney general of Missouri 1969-1976; unsuccessful Republican
>> candidate for nomination to the United States Senate 1970; elected as a
>> Republican to the United States Senate in November 1976 for the term
>> commencing January 3, 1977; subsequently appointed by the Governor,
>December
>> 27, 1976, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Stuart
>Symington
>> for the term ending January 3, 1977; reelected in 1982 and again in 1988
>and
>> served from December 27, 1976 to January 3, 1995; not a candidate for
>> reelection in 1994; chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science and
>> Transportation (Ninety-ninth Congress); resumed the practice of law; is a
>> resident of St. Louis, Mo.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bibliography
>>
>> Danforth, John C. Resurrection: The Confirmation of Clarence Thomas. New
>> York: Viking, 1994.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lois Battuello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Catherine Austin Fitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Linda Minor
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Saturday, July 22, 2000 7:11 PM
>> Subject: Re: WACO
>>
>>
>> Kate, this would factor in TOO with the current political news ....
>Danforth
>> ... did you see where he changed his voters registration from TEXAS
(where
>> he has been helping with the Bush strategists) to WYOMING, his home
state,
>> because it appears likely he is high on the consideration list for VP on
>the
>> Bush ticket. There is a law that says the President and Vice President
>> cannot be voters in the same state, so Danforth just made the change.
>>
>> Danforth is a "connect" evidently just like Keating ... that is why it
>> appears it would have to be ONE or the OTHER under Bush ... something to
>do
>> with this whole Waco-OKC mess.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: kate
>> To: Lois Battuello
>> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 1:23 PM
>> Subject: Fw: WACO
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: kate
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 1:20 PM
>> Subject: Fw: WACO
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: kate
>> To: Catherine Austin Fitts
>> Cc: Linda Minor >
>> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 1:19 PM
>> Subject: WACO
>>
>>
>> Dear CAT:
>>
>> To quote nothing less than Lincoln: A great lawyer spends 99% of his
>time
>> thinking what is the other side thinking?
>> If you look at WACO, with Danforth in their leading the coverup and his
>> connections to Cargill, Monsanto, Sporkin, then you look at Keating who
>> handled the OKC coverup. It is a short step from WACO to OKC--probably
>both
>> were related to the same WMD. Of course, your company was involved in
>> housing--nothing to do with WMC or bio? (Unless you look at Jim Jones
and
>> People's Temple--he was in charge of S.F. Redevel (Hud financed.) It may
>be
>> that you can't be paid for work or are suffering because you are a
>potential
>> "BYSTANDER" to the WACO/OKC?
>>
>> Does this seem outlandish? I tell you the boys won't let even a
>scintilla
>> of evidence escape extermination when they do an operation. Bystanders
>> could speak about this. I use bystander to mean someone who knows
>something
>> or has proximity to possible knowledge re: an intell operation, who is
>then
>> "discredited" or otherwise taken down or taken out.
>>
>> Well, maybe I am just too interested in altering genetic (especially
>mind)
>> make-up of minors (And then there's us old folks.....
>> K
>>
>>
>>
>
