Note Clinton wants only 18 year olds to go to combate.....hell no, he
wouldn't go but would send our kids war?     Places wreath upon grave of
Unknown Soldier.

But the Madelline Albright - and Kissinger - both have been in line for
President of the United States and both naturalized citizens?

When was the FIRST time Madelline was made citizen?  Year  ago she
"reaffirmed" her citizenship?   Had she ever been a bonafide citizen up
to that point?

So we have KGB Agaent Code Name Bor Henry Kissinger with us
always......to whom does he really answer?   As if we did not know.

Saba

Date:    Sun, Jul 23, 2000, 8:02pm (EDT-1) To:

   [EMAIL PROTECTED] From:    Eagle Forum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:    Clinton's Abuse of the
Treaty-Making Power
                      Clinton's
Abuse of the

Treaty-Making Power
July 19, 2000
by: Phyllis Schlafly

Annoyed with the Senate's refusal to ratify his various United Nations
treaties, Bill Clinton is arrogantly trying to bypass the Senate by
signing international agreements to implement them anyway. Each one
cedes more U.S. sovereignty to some global organization, and we wonder
if self-government can survive the final six months of his
Administration.

  Clinton knows that his proposed United Nations Convention (treaty)
on the Rights of the Child will never be ratified by the Senate because
it would be a codification of Hillary's plan to put the global "village"
in charge of raising children instead of parents. But last week Clinton
disembarked from the tall ships parade in New York harbor, walked into
the United Nations, and made an end-run around that obstacle by signing
two protocols to the unratified Convention on the Rights of the Child.
  The first of these protocols, a pet project of the United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF), would prohibit military service by minors.
This encountered stiff resistance from the Pentagon because every year
the U.S. Armed Services enlists about 50,000 high school seniors before
their 18th birthday. Clinton worked out a compromise; he agreed not to
send them into combat until their 18th birthday.

  I guess the negotiators haven't seen "The Patriot" in which Mel
Gibson gives guns to his 10- and 13-year-old sons when British soldiers
threatened their family. In any event, the age at which we allow men to
serve our country should be a U.S. decision, not one determined by a
Clinton treaty or regulated by a commission of foreign bureaucrats, the
kind of paper-pushers who expect Americans to do all the fighting and
dying in their wars anyway.

  The protocol's first paragraph makes its real purpose clear. It is
"to achieve the purposes of the Convention on the Rights of the Child
and the implementation of its provisions."

  The protocol is quite lengthy, nine pages of fine print. That
gives the global commission lots of excuses to inject itself into U.S.
laws and behavior.

  Article 12, for example, requires that we submit, within two
years, a report to the Committee on the Rights of the Child. Since that
committee is a creation of Article 44 of the unratified treaty on the
Rights of the Child, this is another way that Clinton's protocol locks
us into the unratified treaty.

  The second protocol that Clinton signed last week would make it a
crime to sell children for sex, to engage minors in prostitution, or to
use them for pornography. Again, the real purpose is to validate UN
authority, not to protect children.

  Of course, those acts are already crimes in the United States. The
countries that engage in such behavior will not be deterred by some
piece of paper that Clinton signed.

  Furthermore, the UN committee set up to monitor compliance under
the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against
Women (CEDAW) recently ordered China (which has ratified that treaty) to
allow women to sell their bodies as "sex workers." The UN committee
calls prostitution a "reproductive right" over one's body.

  Despite this ruling, HHS Secretary Donna Shalala said on May 31
that the Clinton Administration will continue to push for Senate
approval of CEDAW. She added that the Clinton Administration is "quite
frustrated on the inability to ratify CEDAW," for which she blames
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jesse Helms.

  While in Cologne, Germany, on June 20, 1999, Clinton announced
that he and then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin had agreed to negotiate
amendments to the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty. This was a
follow-up to the "Memorandum of Understanding" on the 1972 ABM Treaty
signed by Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on September 26, 1997.

  This charade is a dishonest attempt to manufacture a new treaty
that takes the decision about defending America against a missile attack
away from Congress and cedes it to foreign countries, something that the
Senate would never approve. Clinton is using the ploy of these new
executive agreements to try to resuscitate the now-moribund 1972 ABM
Treaty, which is actually null and void because the Soviet Union no
longer exists.

  Everything about this treaty-bypass ploy is hurtful to the United
States. Clinton is pretending that the successors to the former Soviet
Union are four states -- Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine -- but
the remaining 11 countries of the former Soviet Union would be free to
develop and deploy ABM systems.

  Clinton told the United Nations General Assembly on September 22,
1997 that he wants to take America into a "web of institutions and
arrangements" that will set "the international ground rules for the 21st
century." Unable to get the advice and consent of the Senate, he is
using his last few months to try to bypass the Constitution and do it
anyway.

  Will Congress let him get by such underhanded actions?
                                                                            Phyllis
Schlafly column 7-19-00
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JOIN OUR MESSAGE BOARD!
Join our Message Board and discuss Global Issues with others!
http://www.eagleforum.org/cgi_bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi

Registration is not required to post to the Eagle Forum Message Board.
Anyone may read and post to our forums.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Further reading about the Global Issues:
http://eagleforum.org/topics/global/global.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read this column online:
http://eagleforum.org/column/2000/july00/00-07-19.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eagle Forum http://www.eagleforum.org
PO Box 618 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alton, IL 62002 Phone: 618-462-5415
Fax: 618-462-8909
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To subscribe to Eagle E-mail
please e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
To unsubscribe, please send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line.
----------------------------------------------

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to