--- Eagle Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 20:00:38 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Eagle Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Clinton's Abuse of the Treaty-Making Power
>
>            Clinton's Abuse of the Treaty-Making Power
>
> July 19, 2000                              by:  Phyllis Schlafly
>
> Annoyed with the Senate's refusal to ratify his various United
>  Nations treaties, Bill Clinton is arrogantly trying to bypass the
>  Senate by signing international agreements to implement them
>  anyway. Each one cedes more U.S. sovereignty to some global
>  organization, and we wonder if self-government can survive the final
>  six months of his Administration.
>
>  Clinton knows that his proposed United Nations Convention (treaty)
>  on the Rights of the Child will never be ratified by the Senate
>  because it would be a codification of Hillary's plan to put the
> global
>  "village" in charge of raising children instead of parents. But last
>  week Clinton disembarked from the tall ships parade in New York
>  harbor, walked into the United Nations, and made an end-run around
>  that obstacle by signing two protocols to the unratified Convention
>  on the Rights of the Child.
>
>  The first of these protocols, a pet project of the United Nations
>  Children's Fund (UNICEF), would prohibit military service by minors.
>  This encountered stiff resistance from the Pentagon because every
>  year the U.S. Armed Services enlists about 50,000 high school
>  seniors before their 18th birthday. Clinton worked out a compromise;
>  he agreed not to send them into combat until their 18th birthday.
>
>  I guess the negotiators haven't seen "The Patriot" in which Mel
>  Gibson gives guns to his 10- and 13-year-old sons when British
>  soldiers threatened their family. In any event, the age at which we
>  allow men to serve our country should be a U.S. decision, not one
>  determined by a Clinton treaty or regulated by a commission of
>  foreign bureaucrats, the kind of paper-pushers who expect
>  Americans to do all the fighting and dying in their wars anyway.
>
>  The protocol's first paragraph makes its real purpose clear. It is
> "to
>  achieve the purposes of the Convention on the Rights of the Child
>  and the implementation of its provisions."
>
>  The protocol is quite lengthy, nine pages of fine print. That gives
> the
>  global commission lots of excuses to inject itself into U.S. laws
> and
>  behavior.
>
>  Article 12, for example, requires that we submit, within two years,
> a
>  report to the Committee on the Rights of the Child. Since that
>  committee is a creation of Article 44 of the unratified treaty on
> the
>  Rights of the Child, this is another way that Clinton's protocol
> locks
>  us into the unratified treaty.
>
>  The second protocol that Clinton signed last week would make it a
>  crime to sell children for sex, to engage minors in prostitution, or
> to
>  use them for pornography. Again, the real purpose is to validate UN
>  authority, not to protect children.
>
>  Of course, those acts are already crimes in the United States. The
>  countries that engage in such behavior will not be deterred by some
>  piece of paper that Clinton signed.
>
>  Furthermore, the UN committee set up to monitor compliance under
>  the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
>  Against Women (CEDAW) recently ordered China (which has ratified
>  that treaty) to allow women to sell their bodies as "sex workers."
>  The UN committee calls prostitution a "reproductive right" over
> one's
>  body.
>
>  Despite this ruling, HHS Secretary Donna Shalala said on May 31
>  that the Clinton Administration will continue to push for Senate
>  approval of CEDAW. She added that the Clinton Administration is
>  "quite frustrated on the inability to ratify CEDAW," for which she
>  blames Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jesse
>  Helms.
>
>  While in Cologne, Germany, on June 20, 1999, Clinton announced
>  that he and then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin had agreed to
>  negotiate amendments to the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM)
>  Treaty. This was a follow-up to the "Memorandum of Understanding"
>  on the 1972 ABM Treaty signed by Secretary of State Madeleine
>  Albright on September 26, 1997.
>
>  This charade is a dishonest attempt to manufacture a new treaty
>  that takes the decision about defending America against a missile
>  attack away from Congress and cedes it to foreign countries,
>  something that the Senate would never approve. Clinton is using the
>  ploy of these new executive agreements to try to resuscitate the
>  now-moribund 1972 ABM Treaty, which is actually null and void
>  because the Soviet Union no longer exists.
>
>  Everything about this treaty-bypass ploy is hurtful to the United
>  States. Clinton is pretending that the successors to the former
>  Soviet Union are four states -- Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and
>  Ukraine -- but the remaining 11 countries of the former Soviet Union
>  would be free to develop and deploy ABM systems.
>
>  Clinton told the United Nations General Assembly on September 22,
>  1997 that he wants to take America into a "web of institutions and
>  arrangements" that will set "the international ground rules for the
>  21st century." Unable to get the advice and consent of the Senate,
>  he is using his last few months to try to bypass the Constitution
> and
>  do it anyway.
>
>  Will Congress let him get by such underhanded actions?
>
>                                       Phyllis Schlafly column 7-19-00
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> JOIN OUR MESSAGE BOARD!
> Join our Message Board and discuss Global Issues with others!
> http://www.eagleforum.org/cgi_bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi
>
> Registration is not required to post to the Eagle Forum Message
> Board. Anyone may read and post to our forums.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Further reading about the Global Issues:
> http://eagleforum.org/topics/global/global.html
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Read this column online:
> http://eagleforum.org/column/2000/july00/00-07-19.shtml
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Eagle Forum http://www.eagleforum.org
> PO Box 618 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Alton, IL 62002 Phone: 618-462-5415
> Fax: 618-462-8909
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> To subscribe to Eagle E-mail
> please e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with
> UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
> -----------------------------------------------------


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to