>
>  For me, people who are for drug legalization are CIA.


This is patently absurd. Legalization will take the profits out of CIA
hands. That's why they oppose it.


>
>
>Furthermore, there is a fundamental issue involved here.



Precisely. The fundamental issue is who owns your body, you or the
government.


>
> Being a Conservative, I

>feel that government is already involved in too many areas and should be

>curbed.


And yet you support Prohibition. This is a deep contradiction. If you had
half the sense of a box of rocks you would see this and suffer great
cognitive dissonance because of it.


>
>
>That is just one reason why I am opposed to legalization, it's personal.


In other words, you aren't being objective.
>
>
>
>
>Miraculously, I have never used nonprescription drugs in my life, other
>than alcohol and coffee.


Both of which are addictive substances.


>
>To me illegal

>drugs are optional; they are not required for life.


All that is required for life is an endless supply of Purina Monkey Chow
and a cage warm enough not to give you pneumonia.


>
>I look at those who

>say they need them, or who try to legalize marijuana; in the same way that

>I look at people who say they need a luxury boat, selfish.


I look at people who think we should all think and act like they do as
vain.



>
>It's a want not

>a need.


So is desert.



>
>In addition I know that I was not born with enough mental capacity


You sure got that one right.



>
>to buy illegal drugs, is to support the livelihood of those who
>also sell drugs to children, I could not sleep with that thought at night.

T
>o buy legal drugs, is to support the livelihood of those who

>also sell drugs to children
.



>
> Yet this was the work of satan himself to have such a

>flesh slavery trade that used teenagers addicted to heroin for the profit
>of demonically inspired inhuman pimps and their hedonist Johns.


(1.) The vast overwhelming majority of sex workers are neither drug
addicts nor do they work on the street. Nor do most  have pimps. Nor is it
anybody's business what they do except theirs and their customers.

(2.) Only a very few, very stupid pimps pimp junkie whores because if you
pimp a junkie whore, the most of the money she makes goes to the dealer,
not to you.



>
>Later I remember we were introduced to a 12 year old "runner" for one of
>the gangs at a half-way outreach house. He wore a cellphone and pager.  We
>asked him how much he made.  He said $600 dollars per day, pulling out
>some
>crisp bills to prove it.  He made way more than his teacher!  Obviously
>there was no incentive to work at MacDonald's or obtain a legitimate job!


This is the direct result of Prohibition. When drugs were legal, this
didn't happen.

>
>
>The older gang members would recruit and use underage kids, because when
>these juveniles were busted, they just went back onto the streets in only
>a
>few days.


Again, this is the direct result, not of the drugs themselves, but of the
laws.


>
>Those in favor of legalization once used the argument that when drugs
>are legalized the supply would rise to demand and the market unit price
>would fall, reducing the amount needed for theft and other crimes needed
>to
>support the habit, reducing overall crime.  Well the CIA supported
>Nicaraguans, thru gang distributor Freeway Ricky Ross perfected the
>marketing of Crack cocaine, which become very affordable and inexpensive.

>However, violent crime and theft did not drop, as predicted, until after
>heavy demand side law enforcement.  For me this is proof that legalization
>won't  work.



This is bogus logic. This is like saying because cars don't fly, airplanes
won't fly either.

>
>
>
> the third world debt was being paid on the backs of the

>fragile and inner city poor of our nation.



(1.) This isn't even remotely true. The third world debt is being paid on
the backs of the third world poor. The drug money doesn't go to the third
world, it goes to Swiss banks.
>
>
(2.) If you really think inner city youth are so fragile, go pick a fight
with one and find out.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to